(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles Miller writes:
***************************************************************************
Re: Anna Von Reitz: 'Reply to 'The Ecumenical ....
EXPOSING FRAUD, COMMENT.
Anna’s admission of dealing with the Pope or Holy See or Vatican, or all of them, for any thing to do with the People’s republic, is simply put, a fraud and intentionally misleading.
The direct simplicity to expose the fraud is very few words. Yet the substance and principles, facts and law under them is irrefutable. Public records known and accepted world wide are pretty hard to beat.
The Popes ownership or control over any American under any pretext was killed very dead in 1783.
First Paragraph of Treaty of Peace proves the point, beyond all doubt. Highlighted.
The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783
In the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity. ( the Holy Roman Church )
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America, to forget all past misunderstandings and differences that have unhappily interrupted the good correspondence and friendship which they mutually wish to restore, and to establish such a beneficial and satisfactory intercourse , between the two countries upon the ground of reciprocal advantages and mutual convenience as may promote and secure to both perpetual peace and harmony; and having for this desirable end already laid the foundation of peace and reconciliation by the Provisional Articles signed at Paris on the 30th of November 1782, by the commissioners empowered on each part, which articles were agreed to be inserted in and constitute the Treaty of Peace proposed to be concluded between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States, but which treaty was not to be concluded until terms of peace should be agreed upon between Great Britain and France and his Britannic Majesty should be ready to conclude such treaty accordingly; and the treaty between Great Britain and France having since been concluded, his Britannic Majesty and the United States of America, in order to carry into full effect the Provisional Articles above mentioned, according to the tenor thereof, have constituted and appointed, that is to say his Britannic Majesty on his part, David Hartley, Esqr., member of the Parliament of Great Britain, and the said United States on their part, John Adams, Esqr., late a commissioner of the United States of America at the court of Versailles, late delegate in Congress from the state of Massachusetts, and chief justice of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary of the said United States to their high mightinesses the States General of the United Netherlands; Benjamin Franklin, Esqr., late delegate in Congress from the state of Pennsylvania, president of the convention of the said state, and minister plenipotentiary from the United States of America at the court of Versailles; John Jay, Esqr., late president of Congress and chief justice of the state of New York, and minister plenipotentiary from the said United States at the court of Madrid; to be plenipotentiaries for the concluding and signing the present definitive treaty; who after having reciprocally communicated their respective full powers have agreed upon and confirmed the following articles.
More to the point, at Article I, the King, releases all interest in land, governments and people.
Article 1:
His Brittanic Majesty acknowledges the said United States, viz., New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, to be free sovereign and independent states, that he treats with them as such, and for himself, his heirs, and successors, relinquishes all claims to the government, propriety, and territorial rights of the same and every part thereof.
Propriety being chattel property as in subjects, people as surfs, slaves to the King are released by the franchisee, the kingdom of Great Britain, granted by and recognized as subject to the Holy See. The agent the King bound his principal, the Pope.
Propriety being chattel property as in subjects, people as surfs, slaves and property to the King are released by the franchise, the kingdom of Great Britain granted life and recognition as subject to the Hole See, Rome, and the Pope.
In 1994 or 95, I wrote to the Pope and the Holy See to get a clear land title in Louisiana. Titles in the Americas were given to Portugal, Spain, France, Great Britain, and Russia, by the Pope to avoid further warfare between these parties.
This is why Brazil speaks Portuguese, the balance of South America speaks Spanish. Also why Quebec speaks French and the rest of Canada speakers English.
We Americans voted English as our nations language.
These parties basically recognized the Pope as owner the whole world, which was part of their franchise duties to give credence to. Thus, all titles in the Americas come from that Popes Motu Proprio. ( In My Own Authority )
I told the Pope, MY GOD, Natures God recognized in the Declaration and his Laws of Nature, were bigger than his god. So the dispute is now between them. When that is settled we will be advised, till then, KICK ROCKS.
We got title, free and clear in a few weeks.
We the People were released from slavery to both the Kingdom of Great Britain and the Pope in his Holy See.
Good luck trying to find another people that were released from being subjects and property by their owner the way We Americans were.
The point is any one basing any thing they do in relation to the People’s Republic on any kind of relationship to the Pope or Holy See as owners over our American political, legal and commercial state, or the People are supporting and operating in fraud.
I dare any one to present one public record document proving the Pope or the Crown, either one, or Great Britain, have any legitimate business with Anna.
I dare Anna to produce documents for We the People’s inspection that could control or affect any American which legitimately or lawfully benefit either the Pope the English Crown.
I dare Anna to produce one public record document recognized by any American or institution indicating that Anna is fiduciary to any American, fiduciary to our countries founding documents, the contract showing Anna’s legal relationship to the People’s governments, and where the authority to speak for the rest of us Americans come from.
Secret agreements or documents are just that. No one can be attached or ruled over by others secrets.
Am I being clear enough?
Is the proof in the documents?
If there is no public record how does any American know something real happened?
Is failing to produce documents verifying claims an admission of leaving the field of battle?
Is it the loser who leaves the field?
***************************************************************************