(Thanks, A. :)

Anna Von Reitz responds:

=====

Ah, yes, but it pays to know WHICH "United States of America" is being discussed, and as you can see --- if you are educated and know what you are looking at and for ---the entity under discussion in the Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783, which is one of four (4) Definitive Treaties settling The War of Independence, is the British Territorial United States doing business as "the" United States of America, complete with King George as "Prince". I have to wonder --- do these Critics even stop to think: why would King George be our "Prince"? Or our Arch-Treasurer?

He wouldn't.

Now, there's a Big Fat Clue for downtrodden intellects, that should tell them all the truth ----should, but every year there's some other Expert offering his Opinion, and assuming that this document concerns us and our United States of America --- when it clearly and emphatically does not.

Charles suffers from the common American Patriot malady of not being able to read what is actually written in 200 year-old French Diplomatic Code. And not knowing that there are four (4) Treaty Series involved--- Paris, Versailles, Westminster, and Ghent. There are, however, those of us who are competent to read 200 year-old French Diplomatic Code and get to the bottom of it, and we have done so. The Definitive Treaty of Peace of 1783 isn't talking about us. Our Peace Treaty was hammered out in the Treaty of Versailles series. So, back to the blackboard for Charles.

I would like, however, to take this opportunity to blast him and everyone like him who seems to think that every time --- which is often --- that they find something that seems to contradict me, with the emphasis on "seems" --- they take the liberty of accusing me of fraud. Am I acting in fraud for telling the truth, or are they acting in fraud by spreading their own erroneous and ignorant assumptions as truth? My friend, Michael Kearns, went to jail in Texas over this exact misinterpretation. He wouldn't listen to me, either.

Let me assure Americans everywhere that King George did NOT remain our "Prince" after eight years of bloody war. And he didn't function as our Arch-Treasurer. And he didn't represent us with respect to the Holy See, either.

*************************************************************