(Thanks, C. :)

Reader Charles Miller responds:

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader: 'Thanks Reader Charles. Although I....

Thank you for the thoughtful response.

Real information for fun cogitation and all completely backed by government created public records contained below.
Have fun.

I suggest you view Pacer next week for more of complete picture of what has been constructed in the court.
Mixing jurisdictions will always fail in accessing available fundamental powers of the people.
Particularly relevant in the patridiot and American National communities is mixing in commercial issues with fact or law issues.

Links to articles challenging both the the secured party and American National cults below.
Secured Party Scam: Link https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=196399
American National Scam: Link https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=195755

Please note there is no mixing of jurisdictions in the published pieces.
More to the point the bonding issue you address are perfected in the Rule 65.1 Execution duly filed. Rule 65.1, Civil, admits the clerk of court is the bond holder for ALL federal public servants. Actions on bond do not require an action. In short the clerk is the transfer agent for DISTRESS ON BONDS.

As far as jurisdictions go the below paragraph might help a lot of folks to understand the basics of jurisdiction in our country.

The People’s Original Political Jurisdiction created our constitutions which out of thin air constructed the administrative state, called governments, which you serve of your own free will because you accepted the People’s Chief Magistrate position and highest duty, enforcement of our law as written, with the job title of President. Thus in our country there are two primary jurisdictions, one superior and one subservient. The Superior jurisdiction, the People’s Original Political Jurisdiction, and the subservient jurisdiction administering the People’s powers and authorities defined by the People’s contracts called Constitutions, creating and known as governments, the administrative jurisdiction.
This in from an upcoming piece that will be shared on RMN when timing is perfect.

As far as federa courts out side the District of Columbia go, they have no judicial powers whatsoever, as drawn from proof by the code it’s self. Below from a published piece years and years ago, now again coming into action.

SPECIAL NOTE:
PART ONE. No federal court in any state holds any judicial power contemplated by the National Constitution. ( No matter how many judges say different. Judges and their courts are constructed by the Legislatures. )
Verification of this statement takes less than 30 minuets reading time. More to the point identifying the federal courts with actual judicial power contemplated by the constitution takes 10 minuets reading. After completing this reading perhaps the impression of fraud of a massive proportion will expose its self.

28 United States Code §§ 1 through 144, Supreme, Appeals and District courts, does not identify nor assign either Article III nor inferior Article I judicial power to any of the code courts identified.

Article I inferior judicial power is found in the creation of the United States Court of Federal Claims, § 171, in the same Title 28 USC, and the Court of International Trade § 251.

Creation and Composition of Federal Courts.
§ 171, (a) The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, sixteen judges who shall constitute a court of record known as the United States Court of Federal Claims. The court is declared to be a court established under article I of the Constitution of the United States.”
§ 251, (a) The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, nine judges who shall constitute a court of record to be known as the United States Court of International Trade. Not more than five of such judges shall be from the same political party. The court is a court established under article III of the Constitution of the United States.
(b) The offices of the Court of International Trade shall be located in New York, New York.

Compare, § 171 and § 251 with § 132, (a) There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district.
(b) Each district court shall consist of the district judge or judges for the district in regular active service. Justices or judges designated or assigned shall be competent to sit as judges of the court.
(c) Except as otherwise provided by law, or rule or order of court, the judicial power of a district court with respect to any action, suit or proceeding may be exercised by a single judge, who may preside alone and hold a regular or special session of court at the same time other sessions are held by other judges.
§ 1, The Supreme Court of the United States shall consist of a Chief Justice of the United States and eight associate justices, any six of whom shall constitute a quorum.
§ 41, The thirteen judicial circuits of the United States are constituted as follows: …… citing federal districts in the states.

For perfect clarity on federal courts holding real judicial powers contemplated by the Constitution, District of Columbia Code settles the unfounded conjecture passed out by judges and attorneys in their bogus pontifications concerning judicial power and jurisdiction.
Code of the District of Columbia
§ 11–101. Judicial power.
The judicial power in the District of Columbia is vested in the following courts:
(1) The following Federal Courts established pursuant to article III of the Constitution:
(A) The Supreme Court of the United States.
(B) The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
(C) The United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
(2) The following District of Columbia courts established pursuant to article I of the Constitution:
(A) The District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
(B) The Superior Court of the District of Columbia.

PART TWO. 1 USC §§ 112, 113 and § 204 defines and clarify what the actual law is and what the code is. Code is mere prima facia, looks like the Baby Ruth, but is actually a turd.
§ 112 USC:
The Archivist of the United States shall cause to be compiled, edited, indexed, and published, the United States Statutes at Large, which shall contain all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during each regular session of Congress; all proclamations by the President in the numbered series issued since the date of the adjournment of the regular session of Congress next preceding; and also any amendments to the Constitution of the United States proposed or ratified pursuant to article V thereof since that date, together with the certificate of the Archivist of the United States issued in compliance with the provision contained in section 106b of this title. In the event of an extra session of Congress, the Archivist of the United States shall cause all the laws and concurrent resolutions enacted during said extra session to be consolidated with, and published as part of, the contents of the volume for the next regular session. The United States Statutes at Large shall be legal evidence of laws, concurrent resolutions, treaties, international agreements other than treaties, proclamations by the President, and proposed or ratified amendments to the Constitution of the United States therein contained, in all the courts of the United States, the several States, and the Territories and insular possessions of the United States.
§ 113 USC:
The edition of the laws and treaties of the United States, published by Little and Brown, and the publications in slip or pamphlet form of the laws of the United States issued under the authority of the Archivist of the United States, and the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent evidence of the several public and private Acts of Congress, and of the treaties, international agreements other than treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the United States, and of the several States, without any further proof or authentication thereof.
§ 204 USC: ( PRIMA FACIE ) In all courts, tribunals, and public offices of the United States, at home or abroad, of the District of Columbia, and of each State, Territory, or insular possession of the United States—
(a)United States Code.—The matter set forth in the edition of the Code of Laws of the United States current at any time shall, together with the then current supplement, if any, establish prima facie the laws of the United States, general and permanent in their nature, in force on the day preceding the commencement of the session following the last session the legislation of which is included: ……

***************************************************************************