(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles Miller writes:
PLEASE PUBLISH asking for comments or support.
Please find below Activities Report from some of the People, Taking Action, in Washington State.
This is a gift from the Washington Beneficiaries Association. (wba.solutions, site coming soon to the web, 360-880-7173 , WBA.solutions@.yahoo.com ) ( all contacts will be responded to )
Please consider this as a pre-release notice inviting Stand up Americans to engage.
The intent and structure of a federal Civil Rights law suit was designed to be a template useful to other Stand Up Americans in other states. Great care was taken to ensure the charges fit the fundamentals of the People’s governments. It is hoped that other Americans in other states will fit in the specific information identifying their rogue, rebellious public servants as defendants.
The suit is about 60% done. When filed the whole case will be released.
Those engaging via the contact points above will be notified when filed.
The below is believed to be a major challenge to all systemites.
Federal Rule 8 requires direct response to every allegation or statement in the law suit. The key elements of Rule 8 require; 1, denial of every allegation and qualifying statement, 2, failure to deny is admitting the fact, 3, denial of allegation or statement sets up case and controversy to be found by jury.
NOTE: the Federal Rules and statutes apply to the officers and the court as well as the litigants.
The essential control of the law suit are GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS AND RECORDS.
Please, oh Please God, support our public servants, defendants, in their attempts to deny their own records.
Government documents and public records are property of the People held in Trust by the governments We created. These records are not deniable and control the facts of the law suit under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Submitting the contract Constitutions for Washington and United States of America, along with the statutes, and public records of defendants acts places them between the rock of our Republic form of government and the hard place hammer of the People in action.
The ultimate issue to be exposed and decided is True Loyalty or Divided Loyalty.
Divided Loyalty, systemites, do-not work for the People.
Inquiring minds of the People demand to know who theses characters work for.
Thus, the law suit to expose the issue of who is Loyal to the People and our Laws of Constitutions?
State of Washington is the Peoples government, a political body, public trust, ordained by contract between the People on the land of Washington Territory via Constitution, which identifies the People as the sole Beneficiaries of all powers or authorities delegated to State of Washington.
The State of Washington is the original political entity, created by the People, owners, by Preamble 1889, as controlled by Article I, Exhibit …… . Washington is a country, created by the good People, beginning July 4, 1776, culminating in Articles of Confederation, 1777 ratified March 1, 1781, Constitution for the United States of America fully ratified as amended by the Bill of Rights, …… . State of Washington is an equal footing State, United with all other Union States, Article V Section 3, Clause I, Union State 1889.
CAPACITY AND STANDING, ALL INDIVIDUAL PLAINTIFFS.
Individually named plaintiffs are of full capacity and standing
All individual plaintiffs are of the body politic known as the People, creators of the State of Washington, a government.
Washington Constitution Preamble verifies individual plaintiffs legal right to hold all Washington public servants to account.
Individual plaintiffs claim ownership position in the contract constitution for Washington Constitution, holding the political will of the People via Consent of The Governed, individual plaintiffs private property,
Individual plaintiffs are the sole exclusive Beneficiaries to all Washington governments powers or authorities.
All individual plaintiffs are State Citizens by rule of law.
Each individual plaintiff annexes CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP. EXHIBIT, …… . The personal Declaration duly verified as public record, ratifying legal relations to and with State of Washington as originally constituted, never abolished.
INDIVIDUALLY IDENTIFIED DEFENDANTS
First Defendant, Jay Inslee, alleged governor, self professed public servant to the People of Washington, servant to the Peoples laws of constitutions under public promise, duly accepted by electors in Washington.
Jay Inslee as the Chief Executive Officer, surety, required by constitution, “ … and shall see that the laws are faithfully executed.”
Jay Inslee knows and has always known Washington’s constitution is the Peoples law.
Jay Inslee knows and has always known Washington’s first law is its Constitution, particularly the Preamble identifying the true Authority creating , by ordination, the State of Washington, as controlled by Article I, Declaration of Rights.
Jay Inslee knows and has always known the Peoples Declaration of Rights reserves inviolate forever the THOU SHALL NOT TRESPASS declarations are the first laws to be faithfully executed by every public servant.
Jay Inslee knows and has always known that every act by every public servant or employee of the State of Washington, in order to valid, is absolutely required to be in full and complete accord with the Preamble and Article I of the Peoples constitution of The State of Washington.
Jay Inslee as alleged governor knows and has always known police powers of Washington State May only be applied in full accord with lawful statutes.
Second Defendant, Kim Wyman , Secretary of State, Washington, self professed public servant to the People of Washington, servant to the Peoples laws of constitutions under public promise, duly accepted by electors in Washington.
Kim Wyman is holder and exclusive custodian of the Great Seal of Washington State.
Kim Wyman is the official record keeper for both the legislative and executive branches of Washington government.
Kim Wyman knows and has always known the Great Seal is to be applied to official acts authorized by Washington Constitution, and conversely no act not in complete accord with the constitution may never carry the Great Seal.
Third Defendant, Bob Ferguson, Attorney General to State of Washington, self professed public servant to the People of Washington, servant to the Peoples laws of constitutions under public promise, duly accepted by electors in Washington.
Bob Ferguson is the legal advisor to all state officers, knowing and always having known, that all legal advice provided is absolutely required to be in complete accord with both the Washing Constitution and States United Constitution as amended by the Bill of Rights.
CLASS 1 DEFENDANTS, DOES, 1 to 147.
Legislators serving plaintiff State of Washington, 49 Senators, 98 Representatives.
Senators, President Pro Tempore - Karen Keiser, Secretary of the Senate - Brad Hendrickson; Representatives, Speaker, Laurie Jenkins, Minority Leader, J.T. Wilcox, Majority Leader Andy Billig, Republican Leader Mark Schoesler; designated recipients for service for all CLASS 1 DEFENDANTS as the highest supervisors over legislative administration declared by Washington Constitution, statutes and legislative procedures.
CLASS 2 DEFENDANTS, DOES 148 to 1502.
Judicial officers, 9 Justices of plaintiff State of Washington, judges, clerks and administrators of all other courts operating under or under claim to be plaintiff State of Washington courts
Chief Justice, plaintiff State of Washington Supreme Court designated recipient for service for all CLASS 2 DEFENDANTS as the highest supervisor over judicial administration declared by Washington Constitution and statutes.
CLASS 3 DEFENDANTS, DOES 1502 to 5000.
General rank and file of State of Washington junior officers and employees.
Mike Yestramski, President, Leanne Kunze, Executive Director, of Washington Federation of State Employees, ( WFSE ), designated recipient for service under contract to represent does 1502 to 5000.
FAIR NOTICE TO DOES 1 to 5000.
Plaintiffs recognize many public servants and state government employees are subject to superiors orders, political agendas, and outside influences. Also recognized is the fact that many times the orders of superiors or perceived superior parties, are not fully in compliance with the peoples law of our Constitutions, both state and federal.
While performing illegal acts under orders or influence is not a
defense, Plaintiffs recognize any one may make a mistake.
Any and all defendant does or possible defendant does are offered the opportunity to join as plaintiffs under Court Rule 19, and report what they have witnessed while receiving a pay check requiring absolute loyalty to the People of Washington and the Peoples laws of Constitutions.
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS
Individual defendants are sued in individual capacity, individually identified or of the class of does.
No defendant qualifies for official immunity provided by public office, and each knows that such immunity claim must be substantiated, first, from constitutions, second, good standing lawful statutes, third public record memorializing of facts.
All defendants are public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing all Citizens, particularly plaintiffs herein and herewith are Beneficiaries, Grantors to and of the source and authority, to and for all governmental powers and operations.
All defendants are public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing that breach of public trust is a crime requiring resignation, impeachment, when shown on public records.
Each defendant claims to be an honest public servant holding various positions in the Washington State government structure, serving plaintiff State off Washington
Each individually identified defendant, and all class defendants, accepted the position of public servant, accepted consideration for services, assumed public office knowing that;
A. Public service employment is a privilege, not a right;
B. Public service employment is subject to a personal loyalty pledge to the law of the People’s Constitution for the United States of America required by Article VI, and Washington’s Constitution at Article I Sections 1, 2, 29, 30, 32. Exhibit …… .
C. Public service training, prior to assumption of public duties, informs every public servant of professional standards required for honest performance of public duties.
D. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office must be in complete accord with personal pledge, service contract terms of undivided loyalty to the highest law, United States Constitution as Amended, and Washington’s Constitution.
E. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office is subject to audit for compliance with all the laws, regulations, rules, particularly the Bill of a Rights and the Preamble along with Article I of Washington’s Constitution
F. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, every act in public office, in order to be considered valid, must be provable from public records, to be authorized by law.
F 1. The law making body in Washington is the Legislative Branch..
F 2. Neither the Executive Branch nor the Judicial Branch are authorized by their constitution to make nor interpret laws for the Washington State government.
F 3. The Legislative powers of plaintiff State of Washington do-not identify the
People as either subjects nor objects under the powers of Legislative preview.
F 4. Legitimate government functions of plaintiff State of Washington rely
exclusively on Consent of the Governed.
F 5. All individual defendants, named specifically or of the class of does, is strictly limited to specific powers delegated by the Peoples Constitutions.
F 6. No defendant, individually identified or of the class of does, is assigned discretion in context of promised performance while serving in public office, particularly considering duties to the fidelity to the Washington Constitution and Constitution for the United States of America as amended and controlled by its Bill of Rights.
G. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, each and every act or omission committed while operating in public office, that is not supported and proved valid by operation of law, and public records, is a personal act.
H. Prior to assuming public office, that in order to be a beneficiary of governmental immunity, agreement to be subject to the criminal laws of the United States and of the State of Washington is accepted as fundamental terms of public service.
I. Public records created by or participated in constructing are full faith and credit, official government records.
J. Public records are not deniable under any circumstance.
k. Argument with or denial of facts of public record is knowing and intentional admission and confession of fatally defective public service, a false misleading, deceptive, act known to be a breach of public trust and a felony, under both state and federal law.
L. No one, particularly government servants may claim ignorance of the law as a defense for acts shown by public record to be in violation of Constitutions, Bill of Rights or good standing, lawful statutes.
M. Refusal to provide any American, particularly plaintiffs herein and herewith, access to, benefit of, enforcement of, recognition of, the law protecting rights under the Bill of Rights, Preamble and Article I of Washington’s Constitution, are always a Civil Rights Crime.
N. All attempts to deny public records exposing, or proving, deviations from, failures to perform as promised, according to law, is the conclusive evidence of intent to act in Divided Loyalty, breach of public trust, breach of oath, breach employment contract, public service standards and honest services laws, resulting in self confessed criminal intent.
O. Any or all government actors, franchises of government operating under license to do business in interstate commerce, that protect, coverup for, support defective public servants or their acts and omissions, join a conspiracy, attempting SUBVERSION, the attempt to transform the established, lawful structure, legal standards and obligations, political order, social order and the structures of power, authority, hierarchy, and social norms of governments created by the People beginning 1776, July 4, a conspiracy admitted by public record as fair notice before the world.
P. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified as does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express in any manner, particularly from a public servants position control or alleged control over any or all, of the Peoples bodies, is execution of an ownership position.
Q. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified and does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express ownership in a Citizens body, and control over same, is an act by color if law indicating Involuntary Servitude, Slavery.
R. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified and does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that to express ownership in a Citizens body, and control over same, is an act by color if law admitting full, complete, unlimited, indefensible liability for every affect or effect experience by the subject of such control.
S. Defendants inclusive of individuals identified and does of any class identified herein, know and have always known that CO2 is a poison that negatively, in small amounts, affects , Citizens, particularly plaintiffs herein and that in known amounts CO2 breathing causes death.
T. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always known that, failures or refusals to comply with the written, specifics defining general and specific powers or authorities for government operations, declared by Constitutions and reservations of rights controlling, is a personal act which each defendant is personally liable with out limit. Each defendant is advised of this fact
upon assumption of public trust employment.
U. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always known that, special privileges in the form of systemic protections with in the class
of public servants is a high civil rights crime.
V. Defendants, inclusive, individually identified or does, know and have always known that, the NUREMBERG DEFENSE, I HAD ORDERS, will not protect them individually or collectively no matter what some other public servant says or does, particularly justices, judges or their BAR brother attorneys, from day one of the life of the State of Washington or the United States of America.