I refuse any longer to have compassion for those who have chosen to do their oppressors work for them. There is an obvious reason why the corporate scum who built and marketed what were once called Cell phones, no longer do so as such. Maybe by version 600 hundred and something it will dawn on you. The Spirit of the Infinite and Eternal God has no need for such devices, not yesterday,today, or tomorrow. ALL the speculation is about to blow up in the faces of those who in word claim to be awake,because their actions show otherwise. You all really need to understand the real reason why they have created their fake cloud.

Life is eternal and is a gift of the Creator through the Paradise Sons. Technology has it's origin in the Creatures of the Creation. I advise extreme caution on how everyone interacts with the technology being used to imprison you by your own consent via your actions.There are some of us now present who see your actions as the blind trying to lead the blind.

The only reason I posted this here under this agents post, is because of the author's words, the agent in her few words gets it, and always has, I can not say the same about every agent here, go in peace all.

..o..

: IMHO, transhumanism is nothing more than loosing your soul.

: By: Harold Fensky via HumanLevel AI

: In the realms of both technocracy and transhumanism, there
: lies a shared belief, a kindred spirit, if you will. This
: belief holds that science and technology are not just tools
: or conveniences, but rather the very keystones of a utopian

: future, a perfect society.

: It’s an alluring vision, an ambitious dream where the
: boundaries of humanity are not just pushed but entirely
: redrawn through the power of scientific management and
: technological integration. Let’s delve into this
: philosophy, beginning with its roots in technocracy.

: The term itself, ‘technocracy’, was coined in 1919, but it was
: in 1938 that it crystallized into a more defined ideology.
: Technocrats argue that politicians and traditional forms of
: governance are ill-equipped to handle modern problems.
: Instead, they advocate for a society governed by technical
: experts — scientists, engineers, and technologists, those
: who understand the intricate workings of complex systems,
: be they in energy, transportation, or economics.

: This governance model is underpinned by a profound trust in
: scientific methodology. Technocrats believe that through
: careful, rational, and scientific management of resources,
: a more efficient, equitable, and prosperous society can be
: achieved. The appeal is clear: decisions made not on the
: whims of politics, but on the solid ground of data, logic,
: and expertise.

: Transhumanism dovetails with technocracy in its enthusiasm for
: technology, but it takes a more personal focus. Where
: technocracy is concerned with societal systems,
: transhumanism zeroes in on the human condition itself.

: It’s a philosophy or movement that advocates for enhancing the
: human experience through the application of technology.
: It’s not just about making life easier or longer; it’s
: about fundamentally enhancing human capabilities —
: cognitive, physical, emotional.

: Imagine, for a moment, a world where humans merge with
: technology so seamlessly that the line between biology and
: technology blurs. Transhumanists dream of a future where we
: overcome biological limitations — where aging, illness, and
: perhaps even death are no longer inevitable.

: But this vision, as inspiring as it might seem, is not without
: its critics. Ethical concerns abound. In a technocratic
: world, who decides what is efficient or equitable? In a
: transhumanist future, who gets access to these
: life-altering technologies?

: There’s a fear that such a society could exacerbate
: inequalities, or worse, create new forms of division
: between the ‘enhanced’ and the ‘unenhanced’. Then there’s
: the question of humanity itself. In augmenting our physical
: and mental capacities, do we risk losing something
: essential about being human?

: There’s a delicate balance between improvement and loss,
: between gaining new abilities and losing our intrinsic
: nature. In their own words, technocrats view their approach
: as the “science of social engineering.” This phrase
: captures both the promise and the hubris of technocracy and
: transhumanism.

: It suggests a belief in the power of science not just to
: understand the world, but to reshape it according to
: rational principles. Yet, it also hints at a kind of
: arrogance, an assumption that complex social and ethical
: issues can be engineered away as easily as technical
: problems.

: As we continue to advance technologically, these philosophies
: offer us a lens through which to view our future — a future
: that is as exciting as it is uncertain. The challenge lies
: in navigating this terrain thoughtfully, recognizing the
: potential of technology to transform society for the
: better, while also being mindful of the profound ethical
: questions and social implications that such transformations
: entail.

:
: https://human-level.ai/technology-as-tyrant-a-glimpse-into-a-dystopian-technocratic-world/