(Thanks, C :)

Reader Charles Miller writes:

=====

Dear Hobie.

Please find below for publish Complaint for Theft and Conversion associated to the Brunson Petition for Rehearing being reviewed February 17, 2023.

I forwarded the below to Deron this afternoon. 2/9/2023.

INSTRUCTIONS on how to send the Complaint to the Supreme Court in the electronic Internet forum are included.

Now, no one has an excuse since it is so easy to communicate to the public servants.

Wha could happen if thousands and thousands and thousands of these Letters, Criminal Complaints, were received by the Court.

The servants own code of conduct at 18 USC section 4 requires crimes to be reported to the appropriate officers. Who better than the Justices.

BRUNSON CASE; ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS ACCESS TO SUPREME COURT.


The first thing to understand is any official government system in the electronic forum of the Internet is the peoples property.
That means any record as established through service to our public service through the Internet to the government website is official public record that can never be denied.
Public record once created establishes knowledge from which there is no escape.
All of these public access places serve the understanding that the people have access to our public service at all times or any reason whatsoever.
Thus, the way to build a consensus for the court of public opinion is to approach our public servants in a massive manner with the same message and archive the proof of their receipt of our messages.
The court of public opinion is recognized in Yic Wo v. Hopkins; “ When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are sup- [118 U.S. 356, 370] posed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration, the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion, or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the government of the commonwealth 'may be a government of laws and not of men.' For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself. “. ( Emphasis added )

IF OUR VOTES ARE NOT OUR PRIVATE PERSONAL PROPERTY, WHO IS THE OWNER AND WHERE IS PROOF OF OWNERSHIP OR AUTHORITY TO USE OR CONVERT?

The essential issue is very simple and direct.
Every citizen vote is a private property. That private property is our expression of our political will that caused the creation of our country as executed through the foundation documents.
The peoples private property joined together in a contract called our Constitution is the source and authority for all government operations for simple administration of the peoples powers.
What this means in the context of corrupted elections is at our private property, our vote, when associated to fraud, is either stolen or diluted from true value to something much less in value.

Thus, the criminal charges of theft and conversion attaches to anyone covering up any manner whatsoever the election fraud of 2020.

Link to article for understanding theft and conversion. https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=214414

I SIMPLIFIED LETTER AND CHARGING DOCUMENT.
This should be sent to all delivery systems and individuals claiming to be x-perts, with request to spread it out quickly with above instructions.

LETTER TO SUPREME COURT FORM READY FOR EXECUTION.

Name
Address
Phone
Email

Date:

U.S. POST, USPS Certified #: ( use if sending hard copy via post )

Execution of Contracts Recognizing Political Property Rights of the

American People Administered by Public Servants

RE: Brunson v. Alma S. Adams et al; Petition for Rehearing.
Docket No. 22-380; Supreme Court of the United States of America.
Citizens, Employer, Demand for Execution of the Law and Rules of

Procedure. Complaint for THEFT, CONVERSION, BREACH OF CONTRACT,
BREACH OF THE PEACE, TREASON and OTHER FELONY CHARGES.
RULE 22, APPLICATION TO ALL JUSTICES INDIVIDUALLY.
ENFORCEMENT OF CONTRACT CIVIL ACTION, THE OATH CLAUSE.

Relief and Remedy Sought: the People’s Prerogative Writs of Right.
Writs of Mandamus, Writs of Prohibition, Writs of Quo Warranto
Certiorari Granted, Docket No. 22-380, Capture of Lower Court Actions.

REF. U.S. Constitution, Article VI section 2 and 3;

U.S. Constitution, Article I, sections 5, 6;

U.S. Constitution, Article III, section 1, 2, clause 2, 3;

U.S. Constitution, Article IV, sections 2, 4;

Supreme Court Rule, 22, Application to Individual Justice;

Supreme Court Rule, 17, Proceeding in an Original Action;

sections 1, 2.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 19, Mandatory Joinder of

Affected Party.

All Writs Act, found by reference to, Title 28, United States Code
section 1651 and 1652.

TO: Scott S. Harris.
Clerk of the United States Of America Supreme Court.
Supreme Court of the United States of America.
1 First Street, NE
Washington, District of Columbia.
20543

Attention; Individual Justices, in context of Rule 22, and 17.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Associate Justice Clarence Thomas
Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor
Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Associate Justice Elena Kagan.
Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch
Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh
Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ( Ex Officio, Void Appointment
and Confirmation by ILLEGITIMATE posers fraudulently claiming
government offices. Proved by Docketing Case No. 22-380, admitting
FRAUD associated to the 2020 election procedures.)

To whom it may concern, Before the World:

DEMAND FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, NOW!

I, ………………………… , approach the Peoples original national court, and it’s individual Justices at the one supreme Court, constructed under the Constitution at Article III section 1, invoking as matter of right the exclusive jurisdiction held by the People’s court in controversies involving a state, or public Ministers, those public servants ad-ministering the People’s contracts called Constitutions.The administrative state of affairs including this Courts operations were originally constructed to serve the People’s Original Political Jurisdiction memorialized and the People’s Constitutions.

I, …………………………… , now exercise one of the American People’s prerogative rights of ownership over the governments We the People constructed under documents entitled Constitution(s), pursuant to equitable title rights, declared at Preambles to all Constitutions, creating all governments representing and allegedly serving the best interests of the American People’s personal liberty and right to self rule.

I, ……………………………, am a Citizen of the State of …………………………, one of the equal footing States United under constitution constructed for the American People‘s Benefit by the State on an in which I live.

I. ……………………………, accept the personal Fidelity Bond of every justice identified above and every court employee, promising faithful and honorable service required by law found at Article VI Constitution for the United States of America, the oath clause, as binding under personal surety upon ALL public servants past and present.

I, ……………………………, OWN MY VOTE as private personal property and declare there is no other owner of my political will represented in my vote because I do not believe any evidence exists that I sold, gifted, transferred, bargained away, my personal political will. Any one claiming use of my vote property will be required to produce the public records claiming ownership or use of my property proving the ownership or use out side the Public Trust Operations of honest elections.

I, ……………………………, Declare, that there are massive amounts of open public records testifying to the fact that my vote was either stolen or diluted in essential value through fraudulent practices which denies me control over my personal property.

I, ……………………………, NOW DECLARE and CHARGE that my vote has been STOLEN and CONVERTED by public servants in many varied locations under varied and numerous mechanisms intended to subvert the Republic form of government created by the People, which results in the American People being held in involuntary servitude to various public servants and their foreign co-parties illegal and unlawful operations.

I, ……………………………, DEMAND every properly appointed Justice, and employee, serving the Peoples Court to make your personal choice and indicate same through official court records presented to the world, defining:
A. Whether your personal integrity and public oath of fidelity requires you recognize the massive open public evidence of fraudulent elections operations, requiring direct action by the court;
Or;
B. Whether you fully and completely identify your selves as co-conspirators in fraud, covering up THEFT and CONVERSION of the American People’s most prized personal property, our individual political will, re-presented in our votes.

Justices and Clerk, you all now have before you a CRIMINAL COMPLAINT.

Justices and Clerk, as highly trained and paid, of higher knowledge and duty public officials, experts in administering the People’s legal authorities assigned to this Court, you all have every tool necessary to craft justice serving the People and our country. Now you also have the criminal complaint that opens all powers to the court in equity to commence destruction of the fraud and its results of unqualified and unelected rebellious powers usurping public offices corrupting the public trust the People created beginning 1776.

Govern yourselves accordingly. You ALL are subject to the same obligations identified in Brunson’s demand for redress of grievance for THEFT and CONVERSION of the private property vote.

You all are in the position to ratify the oath is required for all public officers including yourselves or admit that you were all were from the get go acting as co-conspirators stealing the country.

Make your choice. The JURY of the Peoples Court of Public Opinion is ready to issue judgement.

Done this …… day of February, 2023, duly sworn first hand knowledge testimony pursuant to the pains and penalties of perjury found at 28 USC 1746(1), within in the United States of America venues.

_____________________
… Name…

*************************************************************