(Thanks, C. :)

Reader Charles Miller writes;

***************************************************************************

Re: Reader Charles: 'BRUNSON CASE FUNDAMENTALS....

Response to JediShaman comment.

Thank you for the comment, Jedi, dialogue opened.

The premise Jedi promotes is that application of the law to the facts is some how faulty challenges law systems going back 3500 years.
The comment is limited by the current operations known to be corrupt over ruling the root concepts built into all law systems operations.
Jedi’s premise that current managers control the law and its application is based on the rule by men is some how more valid in our country than rule by law.
This premise is the root, trunk and branch of the tree that the WEF, NWO, and their minions have built into our culture incrementally over generations.

The Brunson case captures the fraud from the time it started in January 2020.
It also captures the 100+ complaints for fraud from duly seated public officers.
The fraud captured is not the election proceedings.
The fraud captured is the ratification of an election operated by fraudulent actions of public servants at the state level, which captures those accepting the fraud as a valid act under which the office of President is transferred.

That triggers the constitutional standards for breach of the contract oath which in turn triggers the treason standard of testimony of two to validate the charge is all that required.

Jedi’s concept that a few mere men are more powerful than the law and the will of the People is what the corruption and confusions are built upon.
Under Jedi’s premise the We the People are subjects to be ruled over and there is nothing we can do about it.

I refuse that premise.
The corruption wins when good men do nothing and the others sell us the premise there is nothing we can do.
The buyer is always the owner of what they bought.

***************************************************************************