-------------
Comments, Kerfuffles, and Conundrums
Yes.
Specifically truths Swami pointed out so well:
--------------
The Holy See, is itself a form of idolatry, therefore, you are asking it to give up its worshipers and thereby its source of income.
Absolute power?
The Religions tend to lick the genitals of Government, as the Government tends to lick the genitals of the Religions.
Bed partners tend to stick together, probably because the sheets are already wet.
Asking the Church to confess, is like asking a politician to confess, or an international financier to confess.
Do any of them want to give up their gig?
Their power? Their control?
Their personal issues, that everyone else is being punished for"?
----------
The opening line of Judge Anna's remarks that caused the eyebrows to raise:
"Most Beloved Francis and All Members of the Christian Clergy..."
Most beloved of whom?
Judge Anna has many thousands of followers, most of whom are begging for stability of reason.
Hopefully she is not leading those followers straight into the indecent hypocrisy of the 'Holy See' sham - the depraved old man in a white robe, wearing a fish head hat, imbibed with too much power, and too much non-productive time on his hands.
Not that I am questioning the perceived and well advertised infomercial legitimacy of the Holy See.
My contention is only that for legitimacy to be questioned, there needs to first exist a legitimacy of which to question.
Additionally, if a Fiat Decree is issued, the stature of the decree is wholly based on the integrity of the decree issuer.
Why is it, the very same international fiat banking Kabbalahists who are destroying every nation, and every society on the Earth, ALL claim the Divine Rite to their destructive and parasitical existence, stems from a Fiat Decree from the 'Holy See' granting them permission to act as destroyers?
To Judge Annas' credit - she did call out the 'holy see', only in a more diplomatic manner than earlier descriptions contained in the above sentences.
Or - perhaps Judge Anna understands the true seat of international power - however lame the excuse for massive fraud as that power base may be - be it fiduciary or religious control mechanisms - and has chosen to go straight to the source.
Perhaps Judge Anna is trying to negotiate, or catch a fly with honey as opposed to vinegar, but given her past works, I don't see her as one to pull punches.
The 'Holy See', as it is called, is the original FIAT ISSUER (of recent millennial history):
------------
FIAT: "Because I Say So"
Fiat(noun)
...An authoritative command or order to do something; an effectual decree
Fiat(noun)
...a warrant of a judge for certain processes
Fiat(noun)
...an authority for certain proceedings given by the Lord Chancellor's signature
--------------
FIAT Money:
Fiat money(noun)
...Money that the government declares to be legal tender although it cannot be converted into standard specie (Gold or Silver)
...Money that is given legal value or made legal tender for money debts by government fiat.
...Fiat money is money that derives its value from government regulation or law.
The term fiat currency is used when the fiat money is used as the main currency of the country.
The term derives from the Latin fiat.
Fiat money originated in 11th century China, and its use became widespread during the Yuan and Ming dynasties.
During the 13th century, Marco Polo described the fiat money of the Yuan Dynasty in his book The Travels of Marco Polo.
The Nixon Shock of 1971 ended the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold (standard specie).
Since then, all reserve currencies have been fiat currencies, including the U.S. dollar and the Euro.
------------
For a fiat decree to be accepted AS LEGITIMATE, belief and faith in the DECREE ISSUER must be apparent:
The 'Divine Right of Kings', is a doctrine that kings and queens have a God-given right to rule and that rebellion against them is a sin.
This belief was common throughout the seventeenth century and was urged by such kings as Louis xiv of France.
Louis XIV of France depicted as the Sun King.
Many people have heard about the Divine Right of Kings and some probably have a vague idea of what it means.
If asked, they will reply that it refers to the idea that a king has absolute power and is accountable to no one but God in Heaven for his rule of his country, a country entrusted to him by God.
Much fewer, however, are probably aware of the deeper meaning of the Divine Right of Kings, where the idea came from or how short-lived the idea was.
For all of the talk about the Divine Right of Kings, it really was an idea that never held sway for very long in historic terms.
One basic assumption that many make, that this was a relationship simply between God and the king, is actually somewhat mistaken.
It is, as much, about the Royal Family as it is about the king himself.
Many people are probably also not aware that the idea of the Divine Right of Kings, though most associated with the Christian monarchies of Europe, actually has Jewish rather than Christian origins.
This was an idea that did not take hold in the original Christian Roman Empire but it began to have more influence after the fall of Rome but as the Dark Ages moved into the Middle Ages and beyond, the Divine Right of Kings came to be opposed by the Roman Catholic Church to varying degrees, reasserted itself somewhat in the early spread of Protestantism but, after that, was soon replaced with the “Divine Right of the People”.
http://tinyurl.com/lk64uw9
-----------
For a fiat currency to be accepted as a means of exchange, it is necessary to paint the fiat currency as a positive, otherwise the majority would not use the fiat currency - if they were given a more believable choice as a means of exchange.
For a fiat currency to maintain its value in the eyes of those who exchange - there must also be faith maintained in the PRIME ISSUER of the fiat currency; or the issuer who 'backs' the fiat currency.
IE: A fiat decree that a piece of colored paper becomes "Legal Tender for all Debts Public and Private Backed By the Full Faith and Confidence (Credit) of the US Government".
(1) The example above is a sales spiel, selling the validity of what is truly a paper Debt Instrument, as legal tender currency.
(2) The 'full faith and confidence (credit)' (trust) by the People, in the US Corporate Government, no longer exists.
(3) Since there is no trust in the ISSUER of "Because I Say So", decree of value in Fiat Currency - the fiat decree no longer holds value.
(4) The Vatican/Fiat Fractional Reserve Banking Industry continues to declare their Fiat Decree of Value is legitimate.
Because they say so - by implementing threat of war or military attack - against all evidence to the contrary - and despite the fact that ISSUERS of the FIAT have proven to be no-confidence fairies in tights - the fiat charade continues on.
Before the fiat fractional reserve bankers hi-jacked the meme of currency regulation, trusted, sound 'money' consisting of 1 oz of silver was indeed trusted, and acceptable enough to the majority - on a local, state, and national level.
Lion
------------
: It is the individual human being, that chooses how to
: interpret reality, and how to interpret the interactions it
: has with another human being, group, or nation. Therefore,
: trust or the lack of it, is what determines whether or not,
: and how, each interacts with each other. Trust and all the
: conditions that affect it, is the fundamental problem of
: our economic systems, political systems, and religious
: bent, due to the previous experiences each individual has
: had and continues to carry into the present moment. The
: desire to make an exchange, and the means used to make an
: exchange, is dependent upon the trust or lack of trust,
: each party has, in each situation. Again, this encompasses
: all the past experiences each individual has, and the
: personal issues that have resulted from those experiences.
: People have been using Federal Reserve Notes and the existing
: banking system, because they have been trusting those
: means/mechanisms thus far. Of course "value" has
: been skewed greatly. To skew the valuation of things, is to
: screw people over. Which leads to over-correction by the
: majority of people, who become worshipers of money, because
: they have been deprived of an honest exchange. That leads
: to seeking an advantage.
: "Competition is a sin" - Rothschild
---------------
