It is the individual human being, that chooses how to interpret reality, and how to interpret the interactions it has with another human being, group, or nation. Therefore, trust or the lack of it, is what determines whether or not, and how, each interacts with each other. Trust and all the conditions that affect it, is the fundamental problem of our economic systems, political systems, and religious bent, due to the previous experiences each individual has had and continues to carry into the present moment. The desire to make an exchange, and the means used to make an exchange, is dependent upon the trust or lack of trust, each party has, in each situation. Again, this encompasses all the past experiences each individual has, and the personal issues that have resulted from those experiences.

People have been using Federal Reserve Notes and the existing banking system, because they have been trusting those means/mechanisms thus far. Of course "value" has been skewed greatly. To skew the valuation of things, is to screw people over. Which leads to over-correction by the majority of people, who become worshipers of money, because they have been deprived of an honest exchange. That leads to seeking an advantage.

"Competition is a sin" - Rothschild

Recall, that one of the agenda points, for world domination, is to make cash obsolete. I believe the reason for that, is to gain greater control over people. Going to a digital only means of exchange, like the blockchain, is playing into the hands of the control freaks and financial junkies, especially since they are still dominating the financial system, and the infrastructure that the blockchain utilizes.

One of the means of provoking compliance, is to make taxes payable in a particular means of exchange. Doing that pretty much forces people to adopt the use of that means of exchange.

Its going to take much more than switching the monetary system. For example, if we cannot deal with the tax issues, just changing the means of exchange is not going to be sufficient. I am not saying that knocking out one of the problems isn't helpful, I know it is.

The Holy See, is itself a form of idolatry, therefore, you are asking it to give up its worshipers and thereby its source of income. Absolute power? The Religions tend to lick the genitals of Government, as the Government tends to lick the genitals of the Religions. Bed partners tend to stick together, probably because the sheets are already wet.

This form of decentralization, which blockchain tech is supposedly an example of, is really dependent upon a particular communication infrastructure. The internet is not everywhere. Taking down a few backbones of the internet would have an affect upon the ability to complete a transaction. Earthquake? Ocean floor fiber optic cut? Corporate control of the various backbones? Government/Corporate hackers? I am not saying that cutting communications doesn't affect transactions already, I am just pointing out the flaws that can be seen for using such a means. Whereas, using cash or gold/silver coin, locally, can still complete a transaction, with or without infrastructure type communications.

The essence of the problem is Trust.

Representations of time, attention, and effort is what "money" is. Essentially, money, as it is commonly known, is Concentrated Attention, due to what people have to do to acquire it. A gold or silver coin requires time, attention, and effort, to create it and is easily stored and carried. As long as it is not altered, it is a product, and also serves as a representation of the time, attention, and effort that went into making it. It will continue to hold the "value" for many generations of human beings. As to whether or not it becomes altered brings us back to the idea of trust amongst each other.

The basic idea of using gold/silver as a means of exchange and a reference for time, attention, and effort is a sound one, until the lack of trust rises again. This situation is similar to the soundness of the Constitution of the united States of America, and its intended function, until the lack of trust rises again.

A means of exchange, should be able to stand on its own, off-grid, and regardless of the dictates of any government or religion (for example, two individual human beings bartering with each other). Gold and silver have not been able to do that, because most people have bought into the valuation lies of wall street. The plunge protection team, the false values for gold and silver etc.. Trusting the words coming out of a banker's mouth? That's not much different than trusting the words coming out of a politician's mouth. Consider the reputation an individual has, and how that can be tarnished by gossip or behavior. For someone who truly knows that individual, all the gossip and behavior can be easily explained away. But for others who do not truly know that individual, anything goes. Trust? An experience educated population is more difficult to sway and take advantage of.

Asking the Church to confess, is like asking a politician to confess, or an international financier to confess. Do any of them want to give up their gig? Their power? Their control? Their personal issues, that everyone else is being punished for? They would have to trust the idea being presented to them.