:
: http://www.newnation.org/Archives/Millard-My-Speech-is-Good-Yours-is-Evil.html

: Please click on the above link, to appreciate the full humor!
: MY SPEECH IS GOOD,
: YOURS IS EVIL

: by H. Millard (c) 2000

: Not long ago, according to news reports, a Jewish
: group announced
: that it was teaming up with various internet providers
: to censor and

: stop the publication of what the group doesn't want
: people to see or
: read. We've seen the same thing from Christian groups
: also, but the
: major difference is that the Christian groups mostly
: want to censor free
: speech rights relating to sexual matters, while the
: Jewish group is after
: political and philosophical speech.

: The Jewish group often labels these things that they
: don't want people
: to see or read: "bigotry, hate, racist,
: anti-Semitic." Now, if the call to
: censor free speech was aimed exclusively at on-line
: threats, this would
: be one thing, but chillingly, the call is to censor
: virtually any free speech
: that the Jewish group doesn't like, and this is
: accomplished through the
: simple device of labeling any speech it doesn't like
: with one of the
: aforementioned boogey man words.

: Those who set themselves up as Lords of Speech and try
: to restrict free
: speech, need to be reminded that petty tyrants
: throughout history have
: always used some fine sounding phrases and words to
: deny civil rights to
: others, and to censor speech that the petty tyrants
: didn't like.

: Consider the history of the Talmud, a book revered by
: Jews, as just one
: example of what happens when the small-minded among us
: have their
: way. Over the centuries, the Talmud was censored,
: re-written, burned,
: and banned, because various petty tyrants believed it
: was
: "anti-Christian," or "evil" or
: sanctioned "baby sacrifices," or any of a host
: of other "hateful,bigoted,racist" things.

: Because the Talmud was so labeled, mobs in various
: nations were
: worked up into a frenzy at different times, and the
: result was often
: violent acts against Jews based, not on a fair reading
: of the
: Talmud---which, remember, was banned and couldn't be
: read---but
: upon the characterizations of what it said by those
: who put the hateful
: characterizations on it.

: Perhaps, if the people were able to read the Talmud
: they would have
: come to different conclusions as to its content and
: much of the violence
: directed at Jews, would have been prevented. Perhaps
: there might not
: even have been a Holocaust.

: The place for ideas,whether we like them or not, is
: right out there in
: front of us. The founders of this nation realized
: that, and gave us, not
: the l0th or l2th or 14th Amendment to protect free
: speech. Instead, they
: put our protections for free speech right in the very
: first amendment.

: It is the First Amendment which is the wellspring of
: our democracy. It is
: from the First Amendment that all freedoms flow.
: Without the right to
: free speech and expression, no other freedoms are
: genuine.

: One of the methods used by petty tyrants in their
: quest to keep speech
: that they don't like stiffled, is to take a worst case
: example, say,
: something like "Kill all_____(fill in the
: blank)," label it "hate speech" and
: then lump all other speech they don't like under this
: worst case
: example. Another method used by the petty tyrants is
: to take a
: particularly gruesome crime, claim that the crime was
: due to race or
: other characteristic such as sexual orientation, and
: then claim that those
: who committed the crime were motivated by hate speech
: they read or
: heard.

: All freedom-loving citizens should resist all calls at
: censorship, and
: particularly those that call for censoring political
: and philosophical
: speech, which is what seems to be happening with this
: call to censor the
: internet.

:
: _______________________________________________________________-
: Edited by Hannibal: It is amazing how sometimes you can
: stumble on the exact article your are looking for!
                 HATE NEWSPAPERS TRY TO STOP FREE SPEECH AND
                     CONSCIOUSNESS RAISING OF EUROPEAN-AMERICANS
                                 by H. Millard   © 1999 

                 There was a time not too long ago that liberals could
            print their rubbish in a newspaper such as the Los Angeles
            Times--a  hate newspaper to many people-- and people
            who disagreed with their sometimes subtle Europhobic hate
            speech had no way to offer reasoned intelligent rebuttals.
            That was before the internet.  Since the internet, the liberals
            no longer have exclusive control over the vehicles of mass
            opinion in this country and this upsets them mightily. As
            internet readership has increased, newspaper circulation has
            fallen. 

            Consider "Internet's Hate Sites Can Be Hidden, but They
            Can't Be Ignored" a bombastic propaganda column by
            Lawrence J. Magid appearing in the Los Angeles Times,  on
            July 19. Magid ostensibly is taking on so-called "hate" sites
            on the internet which according to Magid and  his two
            primary sources for his column: The ADL and the Simon
            Wiesenthal Center, are proliferating. "Hate"? Apparently
            hate means sites that Magid doesn't agree with.  Isn't that
            always the way with the liberals?  Anything they don't agree
            with is hate. 

            For a clue to Magid's thinking consider the  following loaded
            terms sprinkled throughout his love column to describe free
            speech he hates: "unsettling, disturbing, unsavory,
            nauseating, bad, problematic, shocked, extreme, hate sites,
            misguided violence, racist, sexist, homophobic, anti-Semitic,
            anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant, hate speech."  There was 
            more, but you get the picture.  It's the typical liberal smear
            language calculated to hit a reader on a subliminal level,
            that we so often see aimed by real haters at 
            European-Americans.. 

            The truth is that much of what is being called hate on the
            net, by those such as Magid, is not only protected free
            speech but is reflective of a deeper search for identity by
            many European-Americans who, to guess from the number
            of so-called "hate" sites, are getting fed up with being called
            names by those such as Magid who seem to want to keep
            them from going through some consciousness raising and an
            awakening to their right for 
            self-identification and self-determination. If some of these
            pro European-American sites are rough edged that's more a
            reflection, one imagines, of present day European-American
            youth culture which has born in an environment where many
            of the parents of these youth have been race-whipped and
            brow beaten to the point that they have difficulty  saying
            the word "white" even when they want to buy a can of paint.

            The Los Angeles Times is a prime example of a newspaper
            that constantly engages in various forms of white bashing. 
            Barely a day goes by without some new anti-white
            propaganda appearing in the newspaper..  On July 21, there
            was an editorial "Tackling the Haters," where those evil
            whites are once again taken to task for hate against
            non-whites. Funny thing though, most hate crimes in this
            country--even when they aren't labeled that by the
            libs--are perpetrated by non-whites against whites.  The
            Times is silent about this, however, because either hate
            against whites is acceptable to The Times, it isn't recognized
            by The Times, or the The Times does recognize it but prefers
            to look the other way, in order to further its
            anti-European-American agenda. 

            The libs seek to keep European-Americans on the back of
            the bus as good little boys and girls where they won't see
            that their interests are not necessarily the same as those of
            other peoples and that they are being repressed in America
            through the denying to them of any sense of community with
            others like themselves. Indeed, European-Americans are
            called "racists" when they even say things such as "like
            themselves." 

            In present day America, European-Americans, alone of all
            races and ethnicities, are expected to be something like
            neutral raceless drones with no sense of identity.  If they
            express any sense of identity they are called the usual hate
            such as  "racists, bigots" and all the rest, by the Europhobes
            and white haters in society. 

            Hate is the eyes of the beholder, and hate to people such as
            Magid is often just the expression of  rising consciousness
            among European-Americans.  Soon there may be a critical
            mass of conscious European-Americans in society and then
            those who have been trying to keep them down, will be
            clearly seen for the haters that they are. 

                               #   #   #