: I saved all the revelant posts as well. However, once they are
: off the board and out the path of discussion then it is
: unfair for anyone to return with selective quotes. You put
: me in the untenable position of having to return the post
: and start the proceedings all over - do you wish me to do
: this? In that way you will clearly see that Rayelan USED my
: post as an example of what to post and what not to post on
: this board. Not only that but she implied such things as my
: "having a problem with Jack Shulman". I do not
: know who used my home address to spam Naval Intelligence.

: Imagine Internet is my suspect becaused they threatened
: "Rick" on their board. Do you see Jack Shuman's
: name in the last two sentences? No, I will continue this
: argument because I strongly feel that a person's email
: address and ISP number are PRIVATE and nobody has any
: authority to investigate or tamper with them. I would have
: deleted the post, if Rayelan had asked me to - with no
: discussion; with no post on her part. But, she did post,
: started a discussion and you brought the issue back on the
: board. Since you both did this then, it is YOUR
: responsibility to have this thread deleted as well and I
: request now that Rayelan do so...

: Rick
Rick,
You promised you were leaving. Why didn't you?
Must we be subject to more multi-dimensional, eco-transnational, peace building? You are not peace building, you are B.S. building and taking up valuable space here for people who actually have something to add to the conversation. New people logging on to this site will think we are all crazy after reading your posts.
The fact of the matter is: I am very protective of Rayelan, and when I see someone like you attack her, who is not worthy of shinning her shoes, I become very distressed. Go in peace soldier!