Hypothesis: Chemtrails are, at least partially, a test of EMP weapon counter measures.
Evidence: Reportedly used on passenger jets. Eye witness accounts, tests show heavy metals used. Sprayed through classified "static discharge" system. US economy overly dependent on the Airline industry.
Conjecture: Such a device would require a hair trigger.
An electromagnetic pulse canon was developed at Boeing for the Empress II program. When workers began getting leukemia at abnormally high rates, a lawsuit was initiated, and some documentation became slightly more available.
A cover story was made public in the Bioelectromagnetic Society Newsletter. At the time, BEMS was a closed loop of government researchers, that only allowed sponsored people to join. Knowing how the crytocracy works, I managed to bluff my way in. Two months later, i was jailed, and tortured, on false charges of assaulting a security guard, though, I'll concede, this could have been for any of a few other research activities.
I have never signed any National Security Agreement. You can know this because I will tell you the name of the front company I worked for: TDS Health Care Systems. After working there for over seven years, and deserving a promotion, my supervisor explained: "We are elitists." I replied: "I'm not.", and was soon shown the door.
What follows is the cover story article from the Bioelectromagnetics Society Newsletter, Nov/Dec 1993:
NAVY'S EMP HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS SCIENCE REVIEW PANEL REPORT AVAILABLE
The Navy has operated tic Electromagnetic Pulse Radiofrequeney Environment Simulator for Ships (EMPRESS ll) in the Atlantic Ocean during the summer months beginning in 1988. The world's only seagoing electromagnetic pulse (EMP) simulator can test ships up to field strengths of 50 kV/m. Over tic past twenty years the Navy has sponsored extensive research into determining the biological response to EMP exposure. This research has spanned the gamut from plankton to humans and included grasses, birds, mammals, fish, and shellfish. This focus was initiated in response to concerns raised during the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) development process associated with proposed EMPRESS II operation in the Chesapeake Bay, Atlantic Ocean, and the Gulf of Mexico.
The Navy held an internal EMP human health issues meeting in the spring of 1992 to discuss these concerns and the ongoing research initiatives. It was recommended that the Navy sponsor an open conference in tic future. Consequently, the Navy's Theater Nuclear Warfare Program Office (NAVSEA PMS 423) and the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery sponsored the EMP Human Health Effects Science Review Panel meeting in March 16-18,1993. The meeting provided a forum for an exchange of information about a broad range of topics concerning personnel exposure to EMP. The topics covered legal, social, and scientific issues from several different disciplines (medicine, biology, psychology, biophysics, engineering, and epidemiology). The 33 participants included EMP researchers who delivered 14 presentations followed by interactive discussions led by a Science Review Panel. The panel discussions resulted in a consensus view rather than any definitive answers. The issues discussed and consensus views were:
• What is the Significance of the Boeing Study "Mortality Investigation of Workers in an Electromagnetic Pulse Test Program ? "
The high incidence of leukemia shown among the Boeing EMP research employees was very likely due to a chance cluster of leukemia among a small population group rather than due to any health risk associated with EMP exposure.
• Should Current EMP Health Effects Research Impact EMP Simulator Operation?
Current research results and our collective understanding of EMP exposure present no reason to believe that exposure to EMP is in anyway unsafe; if current safety standards and operational procedures are followed.
• Where Should Future EMP Research be Focused?
If EMP research continues, it should focus on finding some effect at the cellular level and be conducted in conjunction with other electromagnetic field research. A specific study recommended by the panel was a follow up epidemiological study to the Boeing study.
Although the primary issue of this meeting was EMP and its biological effects, the ensuing discussions provided insight into other aspects of the bioelectromagnetic arena. Much scientific information has been collected and creditable facts have been generated on the relationships between electromagnetic radiation and a variety of organisms. The presentation during this two-day conference provided an account of our knowledge about a human body's responsiveness to exposure to fields in the vicinity of an EMP simulator.
Panelists at the meeting included: Carl Durney, Joe Elder, Jack Marr, John de Lorge, and Genevieve Matanoski. Presenters included: Bob Morgan, Arnold Gritzke, William Mahew, Michael Muhm, John D'Andrea, Richard Olsen, Mark Hagmann, William Hurt, Paul Gailey, Om Gandhi, Thomas Raslear and Frank Moore.
The report, EMP Human Health Effects Science Review Pane! Proceedings, March 16-18,1993, is available from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.]