Dear Friends, Patriots and Warriors of Truth:

To say that the status of "federal subject citizen" is a separate class or condition which people in this union of sovereign States find forced upon them -- by stealth, by fraud, and by misdirection -- is both accurate and correct. The misdirection consists of the implementation of the Uniform Commercial Code or UCC and dates from the last years of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's second term. The UCC was designed to supplant and then replace the common law of this sovereign union.

To say that Senate Document 232 as published in 1938 is a fraud is correct, inasmuch as the footnotes for the Anti-Slavery Amendment of 1865 (falsely labelled Article XIII), indicate that the original Thirteenth Amendment "failed of ratification" when Louisiana joined the union in 1812. This is, of course, a blatant falsehood since Louisiana was admitted to the union from its status as the Territory of Orleans, a designation which was approved in law only after the original Thirteenth Amendment passed the Senate (April of 1810), and was issued by the action and concurrence of the House of Representatives on May 1st, 1810.

Therefore it is impossible to say that a State which did not exist -- not even as a formally recognized federal Territory, until after the Joint Resolution to Amend was issued -- would then have or acquire 'jurisdiction' over such a proceeding. Our research into the admissions of Louisiana, Indiana, Mississippi and Illinois indicate clearly and unmistakably that their law-making bodies never considered that they had such a duty or responsibility, never inquired about having to ratify the 13th while it was pending, and never protested not being included.

Furthermore, all of these States recognized the original Thirteenth in their publications of law and the Constitution, in later years. Some of them did it several times.

It does bear repeating, though, that the appellation of "esquire" or Esquire was not prohibited by this article of amendment, at least not in the terms and definitions that were used and considered current in English and in the States at that time (1789 through 1876). Attorneys similarly, as defined in that day and age, are not prohibited.

However, if the appellation of Esquire has acquired a new meaning since the formation of the American Bar Association, and if an attorney-at-the Bar has "received" and "retains" a Title of Nobility or Honor (honour), under the fraudulent Fourteenth Amendment -- of 1868 -- then they are in violation of the foundational law of this sovereign union and liable to be "fired" as citizens of the United States. Getting the truth on that as an historical development would be very, very interesting, indeed!

It is certainly my contention that all 'honorifics' associated with the officers and leadership of the Ku Klux Klan, and the military titles of honor of most neo-National Socialist groups are and do comprise prohibited classes. The class of citizenship described by the original Thirteenth Amendment is firmly grounded in the enumerated powers of the body of the Constitution and cannot be divided, truncated or split into 'federal subjects' and sovereign State citizens. It is unitary and consists of two 'octaves' of the same condition -- citizen of the United States.

Inside of a person's home State, the citizen is sovereign -- and in any other State or federal Territory or possession, or abroad, the person is a U.S. citizen and thus is entitled to "all Privileges and Immunities" [See Article IV, Sections 1 and 2] thus creating a 'race to the top' in terms of rights and thus denying the 'race to the bottom' which federal subjects are now forced to 'enjoy.' Again, this classification as a federal citizen is based on the fraud of the so-called Fourteenth Amendment, and the denial of, and suppression of the original Thirteenth Amendment of 1810. Even as late as April of 1866, President Andrew Johnson's Proclamation indicating that the insurrection (which we are now forced to call the Civil War), of the States, was over and at an end -- does not label the new Amendment of 1865 prohibiting slavery as 'article XIII.'

See the Proclamation of April 2nd, 1866.