The Slazon Report #102400
Nomads of the Diaspora

The “Holy Bible” is full of holes. The “Old Testament” is history rewritten to glorify nomads, the most inferior people ever to roam the Earth. The only things “new” about the New Testament are the ever new and fresh words and actions attributed to those whom we have come to know, and love, as Jesus and John the Baptist. I assure you, by their words and by their actions we shall know Them. They were not, nor could they ever have been, nomads (aka Jews).

The Old Testament is history rewritten by nomadic plagiarists in their attempt to create a record to support their ridiculously outlandish claims to titles such as: “The Chosen Ones” and land in the Middle East. The Old Testament is filled with falsified historical records of basically real events written to cast the “tribes of scribes” themselves in the roles of heroes or victims, whichever suited their purpose at the time. The only way they could accomplish this was to destroy, distort or conceal all physical evidence of real history and attempt to prevent Humanity from ever accessing the indelible “Akashic Record” which is the authentic record of every action of every life on Earth. The nomadic fools still think they can hide their activities by doing their evil deeds in underground chambers. They are ‘way wrong. The Earth itself is a gigantic recording device and broadcasts through spinning.

The following excerpt could well be called “Exhibit A” in building the criminal case against the nomadic predators. It is taken from “The Outline of History” by H.G. Wells. When reading it keep in mind that “nomads” are, in fact, the Jews of the Diaspora, the first followers of the depraved “lord[s]” of the Old Testament.

“Civilization is something more than the occasional seasonal growing of wheat. It is the settlement of men upon an area continuously cultivated and possessed, who live in buildings continuously inhabited with a common rule and a common city or citadel. For a long time civilization may quite possibly have developed in Mesopotamia without any relations with the parallel beginnings in Egypt. The two settlements may have been quite independent, arising separately out of the widely diffused Heliolithic Neolithic culture. Or they may have had a common origin in the region of the Mediterranean, the Red Sea, and southern Arabia.

“The first condition necessary to a real settling down of Neolithic men, as distinguished from a mere temporary settlement among abundant food, was of course a trustworthy all-the-year-round supply of water, fodder for the animals, food for themselves, and building material for their homes. There had to be everything they could need at any season, and no want that would tempt them to wander further. [Sounds like a description of Paradise.--JJ] This was a possible state of affairs, no doubt, in many European and Asiatic valleys; and in many such valleys, as in the case of the Swiss lake dwellings, men settled from a very early date indeed; but nowhere, of any countries now known to us, were these favourable conditions found upon such a scale, and nowhere did they hold good so surely year in and year out as in Egypt and in the country between the upper waters of the Euphrates and Tigris and the Persian Gulf. Here was a constant water supply under enduring sunlight; trustworthy harvests year by year; in Mesopotamia wheat yielded, says Herodotus, two hundredfold to the sower; Pliny says that it was cut twice and afterwards yielded good fodder for sheep; there were abundant palms and many sorts of fruits, and as for building material, in Egypt there was clay and easily worked stone, and in Mesopotamia a clay that becomes a brick in the sunshine. In such countries men would cease to wander and settle down almost unawares; they would multiply and discover themselves numerous and by their their numbers safe from any casual assailant. They multiplied producing a denser human population than the earth had ever known before; their houses became more substantial, wild beasts were exterminated over great areas, the security of life increased so that ordinary men went about in the towns and fields without without encumbering themselves with weapons, and among themselves, at least, they became peaceful peoples. men took root as man had never taken root before.

“But the fertile and more seasonal lands outside these favoured areas, in the forests of Europe, the Arabian deserts, and the seasonal pastures of Central Asia, there developed on the other hand a thinner, more active population of peoples, the primitive nomadic peoples. In contrast with the settled fold, the agriculturists, these nomads lived freely and dangerously. They were in comparison lean and hungry men. Their herding was still blended with hunting; they fought constantly for their pastures against hostile families. The discoveries in the elaboration of implements and the use of metals made by the settled peoples spread to them and improved their weapons. They followed the settled folk from Neolithic phase to Bronze phase. It is possible that in the case of iron, the first users were nomadic. They become more warlike with better arms, and more capable of rapid movements with the improvement of their transport. One must not think of a nomadic stage as a predecessor of a settled stage in human affairs. To begin with, man was a slow drifter, following food. Then one sort of men began to settle down, and another sort became more distinctly nomadic. The settled sort began to rely more and more upon grain for food; the nomad began to make a greater use of milk for food. he bred his cows for milk. The two ways of life specialized in opposite directions. It was inevitable that nomad folk and the settled folk should clash, that the nomads should seem hard barbarians to the settled peoples, and the settled peoples soft and effeminate and very good plunder to the nomad peoples. Along the fringes of the developing civilizations there must have been a constant raiding and bickering between hardy nomadic tribes and mountain tribes and the more numerous and less warlike peoples in the towns and villages.

“For the most part this was a mere raiding of the borders. The settled folk had the weight of numbers on their side; the herdsmen might raid and loot, but they could not stay. That sort of mutual friction might go on for many generations. But ever and again we find some leader or some tribe amidst the disorder of free and independent nomads, powerful enough to force a sort of unity upon its kindred tribes, and then woe betide the nearest civilization. Down pour the united nomads on the unwarlike, unarmed plains, and there ensues a war of conquest. Instead of carrying off the booty, the conquerors settle down on the conquered land, which becomes all booty for them; the villagers and townsmen are reduced to servitude and tribute-paying, they become hewers of wood and drawers of water, and the leaders of the nomads become kings and princes, masters and aristocrats. They, too, settle down, they learn many of the arts and refinements of the conquered, they cease to be lean and hungry, but for may generations they retain traces of their old nomadic habits, they hunt and indulge in open-air sports, they drive and race chariots, they regard work, especially agricultural work, as the lot of an inferior race and class.

“This in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history for the last seventy centuries or more. In the first history that we can clearly decipher we find already in all the civilized regions a distinction between a non-working ruler class and the working mass of the population. And we find, too, that after some generations, the aristocrat, having settled down, begins to respect the arts and refinements and lawabidiness of settlement, and to lose something of his original hardihood. he intermarries, he patches up a sort of toleration between conqueror and conquered; he exchanges religious ideas and learns the lessons upon which soil and climate insist. He becomes a part of the civilization he has captured. And as he does so, events gather towards a fresh invasion by the free adventurers of the outer world.” (pp. 131-135)

--H.G. Wells “The Outline of History” (Garden City Publishing Co., Inc. 1930)

The nomads have done this to all peaceful and civilized nations. Please understand what we have lost because of them. You have only to look around at the world today, with your eyes open, and your thoughts free to see it. The nomads are responsible for every evil act ever committed in the world from the beginning right up to this minute. They have done to others what they do not want done to them. They have stolen every single God-Given Gift and used it to do evil. They have taken our Divine Inheritance, corrupted it and sold it back to us for a profit. They did this in Egypt during Joseph’s time and continue to do it today.

They have been difficult to trace historically because, once they invade a civilization and conqueror it, they assume the identity of those they have conquered. This has puzzled many anthropologists, archeologists and ancient historians. Throughout the ancient world they have found archeological evidence that a completely separate group of people suddenly appears to reside side by side in the dwellings of the original inhabitants. After an unspecified period of time the original inhabitants vanish without a trace except for their bones. An examination of the bones in those areas have revealed signs of pot polishing and cut marks, both indicative of the presence and practice of cannibalism. The nomads have a voracious appetite for unblemished Human flesh. Their “lord” demands this. Their priests must supply this. They are dangerous predators who dine their way through entire civilizations. The English language fails when it comes to describing the extent of their cruelty. It is necessary to call on mathematics and the “Power of Tens”. Cruelty to the 10th power. Theft to the 100th power. Viciousness to the 1000th power. Evil to the 1,000,000th power.

Long ago they entered Paradise and raped and tortured and looted it. They decided that they liked it there so they stayed, taking on the identity and the history of the Paradisical population. A few of their victims managed to escape. The nomads didn’t worry much about them. They figured they would find them when the time came. After all, they were hunters, and hunters hunt. Eventually, after laying waste to Paradise and assuming the characteristics of those whom they had so wantonly devoured, the greedy and gluttonous nomads moved on. Since their Human herds had become dangerously depleted, it was time to hunt again, only now they were armed with the stolen idea of being “special” and “created by God”.

The nomads themselves are not herd animals, they are hive animals, completely lacking in individuality and spontaneity. They share one mind between them, insect-like, and all their characteristics, habits and modes of behavior are ritualized. A herd, on the other hand, is made up of individuals, each capable of independent action, unless frightened into a stampede. I have watched herds of cattle. They eat, they rest, they socialize, they wander, they tend their young, they also come when the bull calls them but they do not do all these things in unison. Herd animals do not sit out the Sabbath.

Once, on a camping trip, I witnessed a young heifer who refused to come when the bull called her. She was too interested in my campsite. The bull came closer and called her firmly. She was torn. I could see this. She looked at me. She looked longingly at my tent and things and hesitated. The bull snorted and called her even louder. Reluctantly she obeyed and started walking slowly towards him glancing back at the tent and me. When the bull was satisfied that she was coming he turned and headed up the hill, confident it seemed, that she would follow. She did, but slowly. When she was gone I realized that I loved her! I stood there utterly amazed by the depth of feeling I had for her. I missed her fiercely within minutes of her leaving. I actually felt the urge to follow her and I had a brief vision of joining her and the herd myself. I wondered if the bull would accept me. That incident had a profound effect on me. It was the first time I realized that I did not know WHAT a cow REALLY was. From that I realized that I did not know what anything REALLY was. I had been living in a world of labels, without questioning them. It began to dawn on me that no one really knew anything about anything. We were living in a gigantic mystery and yet some of the most evil, shallow people have had the audacity to place themselves as obstacles in the path of knowledge. Such are the ways of the nomads.

Matthew 23:13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in [yourselves], neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.

In conclusion, the reality is that the Jews are nomads with an insect-like mentality. They do not hold any “rights” whatsoever to a “homeland” in the Middle East or anywhere else for that matter. They are incredibly dangerous and parasitical and must not be allowed to rule or practice their so-called “religion”. It is devil worship and conjurers up untold misery on Humanity. We must bell them as we would bell a cat in order to protect those we love. Identifying them and exposing them for what they are is also a kindness to them, preventing them from committing further crimes against Humanity. Their guilt is enormous. They have proven themselves incapable of resisting the influence of evil. Compassion dictates that we must help them since most of them have been taken in their infancy. We must consider them “possessed”.

“[This] in a thousand variations has been one of the main stories in history for the last seventy centuries or more.”
--Ibid.

Yes, I know them oh so well. They cannot hide who and what they are from me. I am The Witness to all their dirty deeds from The Alpha to The Omega. It’s Omega time now.

Jana Janus
Omnipresent on The Mean Planet