(Thanks, M. :)

Reader MN writes (and I'll comment, following):

***************************************************************************

Re: 1995 - CHANTICLEER, 'O MAGNUM MYSTERIUM' b....

There is hardly any day that I don’t see somewhere someone(s) writing about Nesara, Gesara or what have you. Going back to the Gold Standard seems to be the theme and the problem solver of our economies in these mysterious announcements.

I don’t see how a gold standard is going to resolve the issue? We have been there and we have witnessed many economic crashes, if it’s not us our ancestors.

Nothing is detailed about this revolutionary system that will save us from our doomed algorithmic economies. In another word, will the school of business use the same doomed formulas that have created havoc on Planète Earth or will there be another algorithm of Extraterrestrial Nature that we don’t know about yet? Holding us the same carrot of yesteryears, is not going to lead us to freedom and prosperity.

***************************************************************************

(hobie here.) My understanding is that what's intended is not a strict "gold standard" but a precious metals-based "basket of commodities and resources" backing for currencies.

The idea of it is "honest money", versus what we have now: a system of debt-based fiat currency, wherein the currency -supply- can be expanded at any time, resulting in inflation and a diminished "purchasing power" of that currency.

Under that system, your $100 paycheck on Friday might be worth only $99 of purchasing power by the time get it home. :) Take note of what's happening in Venezuela right now.

Will a change to "honest money" solve all our problems? Probably not, by itself - it might create some new ones - but one thing it might do is de-throne the folks who are back of the Federal Reserve System and who, it appears, are big fans of war.

Additionally, for America, a return to actual Constitutionality would seem to be in order. There are actually three Constitutions. The original document, which had no Bill of Rights, is the one styled "FOR" (Constitution FOR the United States). It was a Trust Indenture that created the government.

The document with a Bill of Rights, styled "OF", is a contract, the one each holder of office must swear or affirm to uphold. It has about 14 or 15 Amendments, including the original Thirteenth.

However, the third Constitution - the one with -lots- of Articles/Amendments but that omits the original Thirteenth - is neither of those. It's the internal charter document of Corp. US.

Corp. US was legitimately created by Congress to handle certain of its business affairs and is free to do whatever it wants with regard to its own internal charter. However, the problem has been with deceiving the people into accepting the corporation with its thousands and thousands of statutes and regulations as though it were the true and actual government.

Note that the so-called Sixteenth Amendment is cited as the basis for an 'income tax'. The second Constitution does not include such an amendment; it's a feature of the Corp US charter document.

That whole illusion needs to be dispelled.

--hobie