Conflicting reports by MSM. Some say two, some say three tankers were hit. ??

Lynda

***********

A tanker caught fire after being struck by a projectile while traveling through the Strait of Hormuz, the British military said.

U.S. and Iranian authorities did not publicly confirm the incident.

A tanker caught fire after being struck by a projectile while traveling through the Strait of Hormuz, the British military said.

U.S. and Iranian authorities did not publicly confirm the incident. https://t.co/htR8bBDydJ

— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) July 7, 2026

https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/2074455907681845377
---

Three tankers hit in latest attacks in the Strait of Hormuz, British military says
https://apnews.com/article/iran-us-israel-war-oil-4732228810c9839a1258309ad43b8289

Iran fires at least two missiles at commercial ships in Strait of Hormuz: report
https://nypost.com/2026/07/06/world-news/iran-fires-missiles-at-commercial-ships-in-strait-of-hormuz/

By CDM staff

(Snip)

A cargo tanker was struck by an unidentified projectile and set on fire in the Strait of Hormuz early Tuesday, as it transited southward out of the strait toward the Gulf of Oman. The UK Maritime Trade Operations authority (UKMTO) confirmed the strike hit the port side of the vessel. The crew was evacuated; no environmental damage was reported. Authorities are investigating.

Iranian state television — citing anonymous sources — implied Tehran was responsible, claiming the vessel was carrying Qatari natural gas. US officials are pointing at Iran. No group has formally claimed the attack.

The timing is not subtle. The strike happened on the opening morning of the NATO Ankara Summit, as diplomats worldwide are focused on Ukraine and Iran's succession crisis. It also lands squarely within the window of the fragile US-Iran ceasefire — which Iran's own parliament speaker acknowledged on July 6 is "difficult but possible" to implement. The IRGC has made no public statement. What this means in practice: either the ceasefire framework does not cover IRGC maritime operations, or the strike was carried out by an actor outside formal IRGC command, or Tehran is deliberately testing the limits of what Washington will tolerate before it "finishes the job" — Trump's own phrase, which he renewed again this week.

The UKMTO's direct involvement makes Britain operationally present in the maritime response, even as Starmer arrives in Ankara with a defence spending plan that the US ambassador has already publicly described as insufficient (see Story 3). The Strait of Hormuz carries roughly 20 percent of global LNG supply and one-fifth of the world's daily oil flow. A sustained campaign here is economic warfare by any other name.

CDM read: Three possibilities. One — IRGC elements are running independently of the formal ceasefire's constraints, which means the ceasefire is already hollow. Two — Tehran is sending a deliberate signal of retained coercive capacity on the eve of the NATO summit and while Mojtaba Khamenei's whereabouts remain unknown. Three — a non-Iranian actor (Houthi remnants, a proxy) is creating facts that benefit Iran without triggering direct attribution. None of these is a stable situation. The more important question is what Trump does next: he said "deal or finish the job." Someone just gave him a reason to hear that question again