My comments:
When I watched this short interview I was disturbed on several levels. There are always reasons, excuses and justifications for what people or nations do. But seldom does the average citizen ever hear the true foundation for a person's argument. I'm going to go point by point to unravel what the man says as he defends his opinions, rationale, justifications and conclusions.
My views on this may be surprising to some, but my motivation is to get to the bottom of the issues and reveal the truth - whether it is uncomfortable to hear or not. Believe it or not I'm not trying to take a side in this issue, but to explain WHY people believe the way they do.
It starts this way:
NBC's Richard Engel to top Netanyahu advisor Ophir Falk: "What info did you have that Iran was about to carry out an imminent attack?"
Falk: "One good indication was that for 47 years they've been saying, 'Death to America, Death to Israel.'" Believe it. They were ramping up their capabilities with missiles...they always lie and they were an imminent threat."
My explanation: Yes, this is true about the death chants against Israel and the US. But why were they making those threats? Because Israel illegally came into Palestine in 1948 and killed tens of thousands of Palestinians to colonize their land.
Why did they do that?
Because they just went through the holocaust of World War 2 and wanted their own ancestral homeland. This was financed and promoted by the Rothschilds of Britain.
Why was the war fought in Europe where the Jews were considered the enemy?
Because the Germans found out that the Jews were heavily involved in banking, control of governments, pornography, were practicing anti-white, anti-Christian activities and had a direct connection to the communist revolution in Russia that was spreading in Europe.
Of the 300 high officers in Russia during the communist take over, 286 were Jews. When the Germans tried to clamp down on communist insurgence and infiltration of the German government, they found that the communist agents and protagonists were located in the Jewish ghettos. They also discovered that the Jewish people were practicing abuse against white women, which was similar to how Epstein operated, and that was all laid out, encoded and part of the Jewish Talmud.
This Israeli politician is only discussing the most recent reasons why they went to war against Iran. And as far as he goes, he is making valid points. The Iranians were and are a threat to the Zionist government. It is a matter of political survival - of their racist and apartheid government that live by Talmudic laws that justify the abuse of non-Jews that they consider animals and slaves.
He is telling the truth about the reality of the threat. But he is leaving out WHY the threat exists.
The reporter then asks further why they thought Iran was going to attack. The man says; "They are a death cult, they slaughtered 30,000 of their own people in the streets. They are attacking their neighbors, they needed to be stopped." (Paraphrasing)
There is a lot to unpack here: First of all are the Iranian Shia Muslims a death cult? Yes they are, if you look at going back 1600 years, the religious beliefs of beheading unbelievers, and then enslaving their women and children. Right now of course, they are on a specific mission to defend the Palestinians, take revenge on those that enslaved, killed and raped Muslims.
Are the Iranians attacking their neighbors? Yes they are.
Why? Because those neighbors are considered traitors to the true faith and have embraced hedonism, moral corruption, western ways, and have made deals with the Israelis who are killing Palestinians.
Were 30,000 slaughtered on the streets of Tehran? No, that is a propaganda exaggeration. The covert agencies like Mossad, and others worked for years to infiltrate Iranian society and foment rebellion.
When the protests were not getting the desired results, those agents then started secretly shooting their own protestors and blamed it on the Iran government. After days of peaceful protests the Iranian government then decided to go in and stop the carnage and dangerous level that now existed. The amount of deaths is more like apx. 10,000 over a few weeks, and many arrests - in a large nation of 93 million. That is the realty of the situation.
Should the people of Iran been given more freedoms and dress and live like they wanted? Yes, they deserved a better type of government. But these things take time, and violence is never the answer. I supported an Iran that was more free.
For example, I saw for my self when an Iranian lady wanted to walk the streets with here hair uncovered, and men of all ages surrounded her, called her names, roughed her up and then before the cameras threw stones on her head until she was dead. That was a horrible criminal act of murder.
It must be realized that every religion has had its religious excesses of abuse of others. Like the Salem witch trails in the US. The Zionist abuse of non-jews and prisoners, and the list goes on. But people have options, you can leave a country that is not compatible with your beliefs. In that way there is no violence, and a person can live free in a new area. Violent confrontation is not the only solution.
This politician kept repeating that the Iranians were a death cult - that may be true is some instances, but if the label of a "death cult" to be placed on any nation or people it would be more accurately placed on the Israelis, Zionism and the anti-human Talmudic laws.
Here is a politician pointing the finger at other people when he plays a major role in a nation where soldiers rape prisoners with broomsticks and abuse them until many are killed. They also sexually abuse non-jew girls and women, and they are told by their clerics it is 100% legal and justified under their religious beliefs.
The reporter then asks questions about the Iranians potentially building nuclear bombs. The politician responds by saying "they wanted it and we knew is was the imminent threat". He went on to say "they are blackmailing the world on oil and would do the same with nukes".
Was there a threat of the Iranians building a nuke? Yes there was a valid threat the Iranians were enriching uranium that could be made into nuclear weapons. There was also a threat, which has never bene discussed, that the Iranians have already acquired nukes form other sources like the Soviet Union, Pakistan and/or North Korea.
The next question is would the Iranians use nukes against Israel?
Of course they would! They are on a mission to defend the Palestinians and all Muslims that have been abused by the Zionists. There was a real threat of the Iranians in time using nukes, and the Zionists saw this as a clear and present danger to the survival of their racist, apartheid, barbaric abuse of non-jews.
The politician goes on to say that "the price of action is high, but the prices of inaction is even higher". In this case, I agree, there would be an increased risk of having to face a nuclear threat from Iran if they didn't act now.
The Israelis thought that with the help of the US they could stop this threat from developing so they could then continue their march to create the super state of "Greater Israel" and expand their territories.
When the liberals try to make an argument that the Iranians are not a threat to Israel, simply doesn't make sense. They are a threat, HOWEVER it is backed up with valid reasons that go back generations. Whether a person believes in those reasons or not is not relevant.
The fact remains that the illegal state of Israel aggressively, and offensively invaded Palestine and murdered tens of thousands of people to colonize a peaceful land that has been existing for thousands of years.
That act of terror is the foundation of the Israeli government to this very day. No amount of religious pontification justifies what they have done. And any people that live there, on stolen ground, are doing so as criminals and are complicit in the wholesale slaughter of innocent people.
This is why the Palestinians, the Gazans, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran have all been striving to defend their rights and the lives of others. This reality is not recognized by the US or the European governments. They have instead either turned a blind eye to the abuse of the Palestinians or have directly joined forces with apartheid Israel to kill more people and steal more land.
The end result of this conflict will be the destruction of both Israel and Iran. If Iran has nukes, they may feel like they have no choice but to use them in a last stab at the Israelis.
Once that happens, Israel and the US will then be obligated to throw nukes at Iran in a full retaliation. That will usher in the modern warfare of using nukes in a war. Once that door is opened, it is anyone's guess where it will lead on a global scale.
What is the solution? I believe in time that the Jewish people themselves could alter the government to be truly be democratic and reject the barbaric ways. They have a very powerful military and are backed by the largest militaries and money powers of the world. To fight against them directly is foolhardy and should be avoided at all costs.
The Gazans and even the Palestinians of the West Bank, should get help from other countries to migrate out of that area and live in peace from then on without having any ideas of revenge or violence against Israel. Leave the Israelis alone - evil will self-destruct. Live in peace somewhere else and actually see your children grow up safe with arms and legs.
All of the military acts against Israel should never have happened, it was never going to work and only brings blow back of violence against yourself. In that respect I do not support Iranians or any groups that take up arms against Israel. War is not the answer. I understand why they do that, but it is ill advised and suicidal.
The solutions I've offered will not be followed by either side, both will passionately reject them. This is the nature of the Middle East, where animosities and revenge attitudes going back thousands of years seem to be an inherent part of their culture. In this respect, as Americans we should have a hands off policy of not helping or financing apartheid Israel in any way.
