https://youtu.be/GZ7wE3XOwFU?si=4wvT49RrAEk3DGLl

My comments:
I found this video analysis very thorough and jam packed with information. However I disagree with much of the opinions and conclusions that were made.
During the expert revelations that were delivered, the author would make broad assumptions on how the radical Muslim Iranians would respond. I found his opinions to be a huge stretch against reality and became "faulty logic".

This is a common mistake the western thinkers conclude by making broad assumptions on what an enemy would do. They think in terms of logical and rational self-protection and then assume: "They wouldn't do that because it would be suicidal and self destructive".
They are using their own rationale and not considering how Muslim extremists think and live their lives, especially in wars. This is a fatal error in their thinking - which leads them down an endless number of rabbit holes to justify their faulty logic.

When a radical Muslim is preparing to strap on bombs to his body and kill what he perceives is the enemy, and you are watching this in person, you must conclude he is serious about following through with the plan.
But the westernized thinkers reject the idea because they say: "He won't do this because he would be killed in the process, therefore he wont follow through".

The terrorists that flew planes into the twin towers in New York City is a case in point on how the extremists think and DO follow through.

I bring this up because several times in this video the speaker will conclude that the Iranians would hold back out of some form of being careful and rational in their self preservation. This is patently false thinking. When the Iranian regime is faced with extinction, they are like a cornered animal and will lash out at their enemies with total abandonment. And they now have the weapons to accomplish this military option.

Another false conclusion so-called experts make is this, they conclude that their enemies have a massive desire to make more and more profits, therefore they will only make decisions that will bring them more money and wealth. I heard this repeated over and over again from Israeli and American politicians and property promoters.

They look at an enemy nation and see it as a future profit making entity, and they will say: "They are good people that have been abused, and they want to be financially successful - so we can help them overthrow the regime they are under and help them make profits".
Here again this is westernized thinking that is based on their own personal greed. They are thinking in terms of money and wealth and assume the other people want the same thing.
This kind of thinking then bleeds down into political and military planning. They assume that an enemy nation won't attack their ships and planes because they will fear retaliation and total destruction. Wrong again.

The Shia Muslims believe that if they die in battle of any kind they are instantly martyrs and will live on with all the joys of life. They have no motivation to back down from their positions and have no qualms about sacrificing their lives for their cause. This reality was absent in this video. When people use retarded, faulty logic, you get a false conclusion.

What Trump is offering them are concepts he believes are rational and makes sense. He is thinking in terms of future wealth for the people, like he has for himself. But they don't have those thoughts or motivations.

He then concludes: "Well, if they won't be reasonable and give up their missiles and their nuclear programs - we will bomb them to hell and be successful like we were in Venezuela!".
Trump has faulty logic and is ruling the world as a dictator with the most powerful military at his personal disposal. And anyone that stands against him, in his mind, should be destroyed.

The truth is, it is theoretically possible that every ship that Trump sent to the Middle East could be sunk to the bottom of the sea. Every US base in the Middle East, theoretically, could be totally destroyed. And, the state of Israel, very possibly could be leveled by bombs and cease to exist. But Trumpism and gun boat tactics has blinded them from seeing this possibility. This is a recipe for disaster.

Would Iran be destroyed? Yes, it would also be decimated in response, this is a given. But here again the Shia Muslim thinking concludes that if millions of their people become martyrs that their messiah will then return to defend them. This is the reality that the western politician is not considering.

But here is the strange part: What do the globalist conspirators think about this conflict and how do they think the Iranians will react? Believe it or not, they have their eyes wide open and are fully aware of the outcome I just described as theoretical.

However, they are still pushing the west and the Israelis to move forward with neutralizing Iran. Why?
It is simple, their underlying, long term agenda is global depopulation. And to see millions die in a war, or a pandemic, is totally acceptable to them, and in fact, is highly desirable.

What we are seeing develop is all contrived and deliberately done on purpose regardless of the outcome on the surface. The "deals" Trump is trying to make with Iran are nonsensical, cartoonish and absurd to the extreme. For example, recently he sent out a note to the Iranians that said this: "When we start bombing you, don't respond with any heavy reactions." (paraphrasing)
Wait, what?!?
Can a nation take what he is saying seriously? He is telling them "When the bombs fall and we destroy your country and kill your family and friends, don't respond forcefully. Have a nice day. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America". LOL

Try using that logic when two boxers go inside the ring. Imagine one of the boxers telling the other one: "I am going to start punching you with the intent to knock you out, so don't respond in a forceful way."

And this is the kind of narcissistic, hedonistic, irrational and greedy leadership we have in Washington, DC. End of subject. George Eaton