I think perhaps the White House Comment Line needs to be
blasted with irate messages from We The People!!! The
Supreme Court seems to have lost OUR WAY!!!
https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
Blessed Be!!!
Lymerick

Mr. Pool
🚨 AMERICA — THIS IS THE MOMENT THE LINE WAS CROSSED. READ THIS CAREFULLY. SHARE IT. THIS IS NOT A THEORY. THIS IS NOW LAW.

A SILENT, UNANIMOUS RULING BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES HAS FUNDAMENTALLY REDEFINED THE FOURTH AMENDMENT — AND MOST PEOPLE DON’T EVEN KNOW IT HAPPENED. NO PRESS CONFERENCE. NO NATIONAL DEBATE. NO WARNING. JUST A DECISION THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING.

WHAT THE COURT JUST AUTHORIZED: POLICE MAY NOW ENTER YOUR HOME WITHOUT A WARRANT, WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT, AND WITHOUT A CRIME BEING COMMITTED. ALL THEY NEED IS A “REASONABLE BELIEF” THAT SOMEONE MIGHT BE IN DANGER. NOT PROBABLE CAUSE. NOT A JUDGE. NOT EVIDENCE. A FEELING.

THIS RULING CAME FROM A CASE IN MONTANA. A MAN WAS REPORTED BY HIS EX-GIRLFRIEND AS POSSIBLY SUICIDAL. NO THREAT. NO VIOLENCE. NO CRIME. NO WARRANT. POLICE ARRIVED, GOT NO RESPONSE, LOOKED THROUGH A WINDOW, AND THOUGHT THEY SAW A FIREARM. ONE OFFICER ENTERED THE HOME ANYWAY — AND SHOT THE MAN.

THE MAN SURVIVED. IT WAS LATER CONFIRMED HE WAS HOLDING A HOLSTER — NOT A WEAPON. AND HERE IS THE PART THAT SHOULD TERRIFY EVERY AMERICAN: THE MAN WHO WAS SHOT WAS THEN CHARGED WITH ASSAULTING THE OFFICER WHO SHOT HIM.

FOR OVER 200 YEARS, THE HOME WAS A HARD CONSTITUTIONAL BOUNDARY. ENTRY REQUIRED PROBABLE CAUSE, A JUDGE’S SIGNATURE, AND CLEAR JUSTIFICATION. THIS RULING DESTROYS THAT STANDARD AND REPLACES IT WITH SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT, AFTER-THE-FACT EXCUSES, AND UNCHECKED DISCRETION. “REASONABLE BELIEF” NOW OUTRANKS THE CONSTITUTION.

THE MOST ALARMING DETAIL? THE DECISION WAS UNANIMOUS. LEFT. RIGHT. LIBERAL. CONSERVATIVE. ALL AGREED.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT SAFETY — IT IS ABOUT CONTROL. WHEN THE STATE CAN DEFINE AN “EMERGENCY,” IT CAN ALSO SUSPEND YOUR RIGHTS. HISTORY IS CLEAR: EMERGENCY POWERS NEVER DISAPPEAR. THEY EXPAND. THEY NORMALIZE. THEY BECOME PERMANENT.

YOU’VE HEARD THE LANGUAGE BEFORE: “IT’S FOR SAFETY.” “ONLY FOR EMERGENCIES.” “IF YOU’VE DONE NOTHING WRONG, YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR.” THESE WORDS JUSTIFIED SURVEILLANCE, SEIZURES, CENSORSHIP, AND DETENTION. NOW THEY JUSTIFIED WARRANTLESS HOME ENTRY.

TODAY IT’S MENTAL HEALTH. TOMORROW IT’S RISK ASSESSMENT. NEXT IT’S NONCOMPLIANCE. EVENTUALLY IT’S DISSENT.

THE MOST DANGEROUS PART IS THE SILENCE. NO OUTRAGE. NO HEARINGS. NO DEBATE. A POPULATION TRAINED TO ACCEPT EXCEPTIONS WILL EVENTUALLY LIVE WITHOUT RIGHTS. A SOCIETY THAT NORMALIZES EMERGENCY AUTHORITY ALWAYS LEARNS TOO LATE THAT THE EMERGENCY NEVER ENDS.

THIS RULING FORCES A SIMPLE QUESTION: ARE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS FIRM LIMITS ON POWER — OR TEMPORARY PRIVILEGES THAT VANISH WHEN FEAR IS INVOKED? IF CONCERN ALONE JUSTIFIES FORCED ENTRY, THEN PRIVACY IS CONDITIONAL. IF FEAR OVERRIDES DUE PROCESS, THEN FREEDOM IS THEORETICAL.

THIS WAS NOT A SMALL LEGAL CHANGE. THIS WAS A STRUCTURAL SHIFT. THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WAS NOT REPEALED — IT WAS HOLLOWED OUT.

⚠️ THE DOOR IS NOW OPEN. THE QUESTION IS NOT IF IT WILL BE USED — BUT HOW FAR IT WILL GO. PAY ATTENTION. BECAUSE ONCE EMERGENCY EXCEPTIONS BECOME NORMAL, THE CONSTITUTION BECOMES OPTIONAL.

Follow/Share my channel, stay updated👇
https://t.me/MrPool_Q