VAL THOR
@CMDRVALTHOR
OD

Sun. 28 Dec. 2025 JAG TRIBUNAL CLAIMS: FORMER FBI SUPERVISOR FOUND GUILTY OF TREASON AT GITMO …The MAGA King on Telegram

Claims circulating in alternative intelligence channels allege that the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps conducted a closed tribunal at Guantanamo Bay involving former FBI supervisory agent Sally Moyer. According to these reports, a military panel convicted Moyer on charges described as treason and sedition, tied to actions during the 2016 election period and efforts aimed at undermining the Trump presidency. No confirmation has been issued by official government or mainstream media sources.

The allegations say Moyer was arrested on a sealed indictment in early November and accused of participating in a covert network inside the intelligence community opposed to Donald Trump. Prosecutors reportedly argued she helped advance discredited narratives tied to the Russia-collusion saga, using internal communications and leaks to shape public perception and damage the presidency.

During the proceedings, JAG trial counsel allegedly presented emails referencing the creation and circulation of a “dossier,” which prosecutors claimed pointed to the Steele Dossier. Defense counsel objected, arguing the messages were ambiguous and failed to establish intent. The panel reportedly overruled those objections after additional communications were introduced.

Further claims assert that whistleblowers testified about coordination between Moyer and anti-Trump factions, including the transfer of classified materials to sympathetic media outlets. The defense characterized Moyer as a patriot targeted for dissent, while prosecutors framed the conduct as an organized attempt to subvert constitutional authority.

According to the same sources, the panel returned a guilty verdict and recommended the harshest sentence. Officials cited by these outlets say additional evidence existed but was not required to reach a decision. An execution date has been alleged, though no independent verification exists.

As with similar reports, these claims remain unverified. What is clear is that they are spreading rapidly, reflecting a broader narrative of behind-the-scenes accountability tied to the 2016–2020 period. Whether substantiated or not, the story underscores the intensity of ongoing disputes over intelligence conduct, political power, and constitutional limits.

6:34 AM · Dec 29, 2025
·
1,965
Views