The entire text of this post is shown below to allow it to be read in its entirety here on RMN. The original post on X with the embedded video is shown below it . . . SC

"If you want to know who really rules over you find out who you are not allowed to criticize"

*****************

DD Geopolitics
@DD_Geopolitics

Antisemitism is now being labeled a “National Security Threat.”

At the Hudson Institute’s event literally titled “Antisemitism as a National Security Threat,” Hoover Fellow Cole Bunzel openly warned that students he mentors at Stanford “will tell you that Nick Fuentes has popularity.”

But once you label something a national security threat, the consequences are not academic:

When the U.S. places an issue inside the national‑security box, it unlocks the entire counterterrorism apparatus: surveillance, intelligence collection, FBI task forces, DHS “extremism” units, tech‑platform enforcement, funding pipelines, and speech restrictions disguised as safety measures.

It means:

• FBI and DHS can treat speech, associations, or online communities as pre‑terror indicators, using counterterrorism authorities that bypass normal First Amendment constraints.
• Tech companies can be quietly pushed to suppress or remove content under “harm‑based” national security frameworks. If “antisemitism” is defined through IHRA or similar standards, criticism of Israel can be swept into the dragnet.
• Billions in federal grants can flow to NGOs, think tanks, and private actors to police public discourse.
• Schools, universities, federal agencies, and workplaces can implement mandatory compliance systems, investigations, and reporting mechanisms.
• For non‑citizens, the label can justify visa denials, deportations, and security screenings tied to political expression.
• Because national security classifications are opaque and unreviewable, there is no public oversight, no transparency, and almost no way to challenge misuse.

All it takes is a handful of Washington institutions, a few think‑tank panels, and a manufactured panic to define “antisemitism” so broadly that it effectively includes anti‑Zionism, criticism of a foreign state, or even unpopular political opinions held by college students.

This is dangerous because once an issue enters the national‑security domain, it never comes back out.

0:22 / 1:01 - 3:16 PM · Dec 12, 2025 · 30.6K Views

**************

🇺🇸🇮🇱 Antisemitism is now being labeled a “National Security Threat.”

At the Hudson Institute’s event literally titled “Antisemitism as a National Security Threat,” Hoover Fellow Cole Bunzel openly warned that students he mentors at Stanford “will tell you that Nick Fuentes has… pic.twitter.com/t463c6a4ap

— DD Geopolitics (@DD_Geopolitics) December 12, 2025