Thank you for your insightful words Sharon who writes;

I comprehend your frustration(s) around certain types of posts you don't agree with, or approve of, but I wish to ask you to meditate on what you're proposing when you offer forms of censorship as solutions to protect the credibility of RMN.

Denying people the opportunity to read or view things that you consider BS denies people the opportunity to grow their own discernment. Frankly - and I absolutely mean this - self-appointed ministers of truth would do much more harm to RMN's integrity than just about anything else. Perhaps, a possible
solution would be to require a disclaimer on EVERY post of anything outside of 'normal stuff' (whatever THAT is), like the one that's put at the beginning of Ben Fulford's posts. It's made clear that no endorsement is implied, and to please use discernment.

Mock things if you like - mock things if you feel you must - but batting around thoughts on outright censorship defeats everything, in my personal opinion, that RMN stands for. It's value is in its breadth.

------
My aim is/was never to criticise RMN, God forbid, and in no way also to mock any of its content. Censorship's running rampant in the world outside of RMN, and as you wrote " It's value is in its breadth," which is so true, yet...there's a fine line there as should all dissolve to the level of RRN, then any credibility as to its present good standing would rapidly go down hill.

Re: "Denying people the opportunity to read or view things that you consider BS denies people the opportunity to grow their own discernment." - sorry but IMHO that's absolutely nonsensical, as people can and should read what resonates with them, without being 'told' not what to.

Re: "Perhaps, a possible solution would be to require a disclaimer on EVERY post of anything outside of 'normal stuff' (whatever THAT is), like the one that's put at the beginning of Ben Fulford's posts. It's made clear that no endorsement is implied, and to please use discernment." - Total agreement.
I'd add also (in jest) that it may be damaging to your mental health.

-----

Fox.