A post submitted by CGI member ScienceTruth.

***************************************

The Winnemucca Institute for Advanced Studies presents

Giant Clues

There are some Giant Clues staring us right in the face; and Mainstream Science is totally blind to seeing them for what they really are, and for what they are really telling us; about the True Nature of the World, the Universe, and this Reality.

Something needs to be done about this "dereliction of duty" by Mainstream Science !!!

And Some of these Giant Clues are:

1). The Pendulum: In how a pendulum will swing in a fixed orientation to the fixed stars, and it will NOT swing in a fixed orientation to the local system in which it exists. To wit: a pendulum will NOT swing in a fixed orientation to the rotating Earth ! A pendulum will move in a fixed orientation to the furthest distant mass it can sense, the so called 'fixed stars'. Why is this ? !

2). Radioactive half-lives: The inexplicable nature of atoms, when singly or in groups; in that we cannot predict when a single atom will release its radioactive particle, but in large groups atoms have exactingly predictable particle release half-lives. This is telling us something extremely important in regards to how Matter is composed of Energy, what the Rules that pertain to this construction are, and how they apply.

3). Why is the atom 99.99% empty space:

In the viewpoint of a 'wavefunction energy-density' for Matter, and how it interacts among its amplitudes, both positive and negative, which then represent 'matter and antimatter', and 'where the wave function's cancel out to zero' is where and why 99.99% of the atom's 'space volume' has 'nothing' in it. This is because the wave function amplitudes are not 'adding together' or 'subtracting together', they are 'cancelling out', and that's why the majority of an atom is so 'empty'. The atom as such is merely an 'artifact' of its 'wavefunction structure' of origin. This is also why atomic ejected 'particles' can suddenly 'rush off ' from a standing start, because there is no actual particle rushing off, it is the wavefunction amplitude 'node of intersection' which is rushing off. This 'intersection' is where the wavefunctions interact with each other to produce an additive amplitude node of location, this 'node location' is where we see a 'particle'. It is really just an addition of amplitudes from intersecting waves. Atoms are merely wavefunction amplitudes at their nodes of amplitude additions, both positive (matter) and negative (anti-matter). 'Particles' ejected from atoms, as well as other 'particle like' phenomena, are merely 'nodes of amplitude additions' rushing off from that 'location' of a 'wavefunction interaction'. And as such, this intersection node of the wavefunction amplitude has no 'inherent mass', and is thusly quite able to 'instantly accelerate' to the Speed of Light ! This description accounts for how 'particles' suddenly go at very high speeds. It also raises questions about how a magnetic field interacts with charged particles to curve their path.

4). The Double Slit Experiment: This is perhaps the most famous of the inexplicable experiments of all time !!! It led to the Wave-Particle Duality Theory, Quantum Theory, Entanglement Theory, Quantum ElectroDynamics Theory, and it still boggles the mind of all those who read about it. What more can the Double Slit Experiment tell us ?

5). The Precession of the planet Mercury: Is this really telling us how ElectroMagnetic forces are aiding gravity to maintain circular orbits of the closer-in planets ? I expect that it is ! More work needs be done on this. The Electric Universe Theory guys have figured this out, and I think they are correct !

6). The 'Bending of Light' close to the limb of the Sun, and the 'NO bending' of light a further distance beyond the limb of the Sun : as Edward Dowdye Jr. discovered when he worked at NASA. If gravity was really 'bending' the path of light near a star, it wouldn't suddenly 'stop bending' it a small proportional distance away from where it 'is bending' it ! The 'bending' would slowly diminish at the rate that gravity diminishes away from the star !, but that isn't what happens !!, the light bending effect rapidly stops not far from the Sun beyond its 'limb', or outer edge, and long before the Sun's gravity field would continue to bend the background starlight passing its limb if gravity was the real 'culprit'.. Thus; it is the Sun's plasma 'atmosphere' that is bending the background starlight ! and we need to now understand this, as gravity is NOT what is 'bending' the starlight as Einstein erroneously assumed.

7). How certain elements, like Cadmium, will absorb neutrons ad nauseum: Why do certain elements absorb so many neutrons, and others won't ? And what do they do with them ?? Can they change the neutrons into something else, and that's why they can seemingly absorb so many ? Is Cadmium turning neutrons into 'something else' ? And if so, what ? And if not, where are they going ?

Eight). The Casimir Effect: I suspect that this effect is actually telling us 'the level of the Entropic Floor' in that particular location, and not what Mainstream Physics is saying. It would be correct to say that the level of the Entropic Floor is the amount of 'unavailable energy' present in the space-energy continuum in that location. In other words, you cannot 'siphon' any energy from that 'level', to a 'lower level', and get 'some work out of it', on its 'enticed' way to an even lower level, because there is No lower energy level in that location, which is why I term it the Entropic Floor, which is a new description label.

Entropy is defined as "the amount of unavailable energy" in the system under study. In order to use energy to do 'work' for us, we take energy from one location and transfer it to another location, and extract some of the 'difference' between the 'locations' to do our 'work'. e.g. - a water wheel is used to grind grain. The higher level of the water at the top of the wheel is pulled down by gravity to the lower level at the bottom of the wheel, and we extract the energy difference between these two locations, and use some of that energy difference to do the work of grinding the grain. Friction losses consume the remainder.

To 'wind up' against gravity, go higher up. Or, to gain more gravitational potential energy, go further away. Thusly, when you finally 'crash to the ground' you will 'land harder' if you are further away at the start, and thus, more energy is released in the crash, thusly, a higher gravitational potential energy exists at the 'higher location'.

Conversely, to 'wind up' against an electric charge potential, get closer. Pushing two 'like charges' closer together creates a higher repulsive potential energy in each, as they will 'fly apart' faster and more forcefully when released. The closer they are at the start, the more forcefully "like charges" will 'fly apart'.

It is very interesting that gravity and the electric charge have this 'opposite' nature about themselves ! Similar, but opposite !

9). Two important principles in Physics are embodied in the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics: "You can't get something for nothing", and, "There's no free lunch". These both imply that the current, ongoing alchemist's search for 'free energy', or the seemingly magical things in Sci-Fi writings like small hand-held energy weapons of enormous power, as well as 'teleporters' and 'replicators', are 'pie in the sky' wishful thinking, and cannot actually be engineered, as you cannot get that much 'power' or 'energy' out of that small of a volume of space and matter, and also to convert it in such a way as is demonstrated in films, etc.

10). Why is there a 'Speed of Light': Is it really a 'speed' ? Or is it actually the 'Ratio of Space to Time'. (see: Interpreting Dobson.) There is a limit to how fast Matter can go, which is almost to be expected, as the Radiative State of Energy has as its 'basic' velocity, the Speed of Light, it would almost naturally follow that Matter would not be able to equal or exceed that Speed.

11). Pair Production and its Inverse Reaction: In how a particle and its anti-particle will spontaneously appear from arriving EM spectrum radiations, or disappear in annihilation into gamma radiation. When certain wavelengths of arriving EM radiation meet, a particle and its anti-particle can appear. This behavior is telling us something very important about the true nature of Matter and Energy, and the intimate relationship between the two. Likewise, when Matter and AntiMatter meet and 'annihilate' each other in a catastrophic release of gamma radiation which evidences itself in a specific amount and wavelength of EM Spectrum radiation depending on the type of annihilating particles, why exactly do they do this ? These are very big clues that Mainstream Science is totally missing, and is it because it is so 'in our face', that we totally fail to see it !!! That Matter is a Special State that Energy has the ability to assume ! and that everything in this Universe is just Energy in its true bottom line.

12). Redshift: And what is it really telling us ! This is a very complex subject, and is just listed here for the outline.

13). Some subjects I'd like to write a 'Paper' on, and post on future Saturday's this Winter.

Why are many puffy white clouds 'flat' on their bottoms ?

How can Light energy pass right thru a solid glass window pane ? as most all other 'solid' objects totally block Light !

How does ultraviolet light, when shining on a metal plate, produce a small electric current in that metal plate ?

When Mileva Maric (Albert Einstein's first wife) worked with Philipp Lenard in the 1890's, when Lenard was working on how ultraviolet light will make an electric current in a metal plate, and he won the Nobel Prize in Physics for 1902 for his 'PhotoElectric Effect' Paper, and Mileva began to wonder about how Light, or the EM Spectrum of radiations all move "at the speed of light", and why is that ? and could Light be considered to be an "Invariant" ?? as it always moves at the same 'speed' !! So I suspect she began a search to see if there are any other 'Invariants' ! besides 'Light' !! And when Mileva later worked with Albert Einstein, I think it was her ideas, along with Albert's input, that they developed her "Theory of Invariants" and my understanding at this time is that it was the Mainstream Media of the day who then termed it the "Theory of Relativity" !!! and changed the focus of 'constant velocity' into a focus on 'time'. Mileva preferred 'Invariants' to 'Relativity', but being a woman, nobody listened to her ! Such was the zeitgeist of those times.

Mileva needs to be much more looked at in terms of what she was doing and thinking and wanting to work on !!

============

Information provided by the Winnemucca Institute for Advanced Studies is for educational purposes. Our ‘Man on the Street Series’ of informative Science Papers is designed to provide a semi-technical answer to everyday experiences.