When they murdered John Paul 1

: I have been wondering how they would go about their
: "SUBTLE" INSIDIOUS plan to destroy the Church
: from the INSIDE, as we were warned about...

: THIS: * >>

: In other words...THEY FORM A COMMITTEE/PARLIAMENT and SUBVERT
: THE LEGITIMACY of the POPE.

: Because of his already Socialist beliefs, Francis was easily
: pushed into the ideology of the Marxists, but Pope Leo, I
: believe is a lot more centered in his beliefs and won't be

: swayed in the same way. He has made some WRONG choices
: though and that is telling. The way they get around any of
: his resistance will be to lessen his power as Pope.

: MAKES TOTAL SENSE!

: -----------------------------------------

: SUBSTACK: EXCLUSIVE interview with Archbishop Viganò, Part 1:
: Leo
: "I fear that Leo represents 'Modernism with a human
: face."

: Stephen Kokx: Your Excellency, many of Prevost’s decisions
: indicate that he wishes to continue along the heretical
: course of his predecessors, particularly the synodal path
: charted by Jorge Bergoglio. Many seem to believe we need to
: “give him time” and “hold out hope” that things will
: improve. At the same time, it seems Prevost’s agenda is
: quite clear and that silence or “giving him the benefit of
: the doubt” – while also putting a more positive spin on his
: reign – could cause scandal by omission and/or by creating
: false hope. What do you make of these arguments and how
: should Catholics be viewing this “pontificate” a little
: over two months in?

: Carlo Maria Viganò: None of us can judge the internal forum,
: that is, the interior dispositions with which a person acts
: or speaks: only Our Lord, who sees into the depths of our
: hearts, can do that. But this does not mean that we cannot
: express an assessment on the external forum, that is, on
: the effects and consequences that a person’s actions or
: statements can have in general or in a specific context.
: This also applies to Leo, whose election is seen by many as
: a sign of change from the disastrous period of Bergoglian
: usurpation, even though there is no evidence to suggest
: this. Indeed, Leo’s governance actions, appointments, and
: public statements are multiplying, demonstrating his
: complete alignment with his predecessor of ill-fated
: memory.

: I myself, as I think many noted in the days immediately
: following the election, preferred to refrain from publicly
: expressing my views on Leo with comments that might have
: seemed hasty.

: After just over two months, however, I believe it is possible
: to find consistency in Leo’s actions and statements with
: the line drawn by Bergoglio. And perhaps that impromptu
: appearance of Sister Nathalie Becquart 1 and other members
: of the Synod elite for a selfie with the newly elected pope
: 2 today acquires a significance that may have initially
: escaped most. The message we can glean from this – and
: which is accompanied by the blissful and satisfied smiles
: of many ultra-progressive Electors (among them Cardinal
: Cupich of Chicago) who appeared on the Loggia after the
: white smoke – is that the synodal path from which the
: Bergoglian and post-Bergoglian Church can in no way escape
: has already been mapped out, and that Leo was elected on
: the fourth ballot as the continuator of the synodal
: mandate, and not of the munus petrinum.

: * >>

: more here:
: https://kokxnews.substack.com/p/exclusive-interview-with-archbishop