The killing of Jesus Christ on the cross has probably been the single-most written about event in history, and yet despite what the plain words of the gospel witnesses tell us, no one has taken responsibility for it. The accusation of “Christ killers” has been a proverbial “hot potato” passed around from one group to another — resulting in 2,000 years of finger-pointing, recriminations, and denials steeped in self-justification.
If we cannot agree on who killed Christ, was His death in vain?
The traditional Christian view — promoted by the Catholic and Protestant churches — has been that “the Jews” killed Christ, but after intense pressure from powerful Jewish groups who claimed this accusation was a “blood libel,” the Catholic Church in the wake of Vatican II, officially exonerated “the Jews” and placed the blamed on “the Romans.” And the judeo-philic Protestant denominations — dominated by the evangelical Zionists — followed the lead of the Catholic Church and shifted the blame — again — onto “the Romans.”
The Jews, of course, claim the Romans killed Christ — while the so-called “gentiles” are scarcely able to accuse the Jews — who accuse them of anti-semitism for merely quoting the Scripture which says, “Men of Israel, Jesus the Nazarene you nailed to the cross.” (Acts 2:22-23) And many White Christians who are aware they are the true Israel of Scripture insist it was the “Edomite Jews” who killed Christ — not Israel.
Ironically, it has reached a point where white Israelite Christians and the Jews are in lock-step with one another — each dispensing countermeasures to redirect the blame elsewhere. The “gentiles” sit bewildered in the middle — subjected to the Stockholm Syndrome by the Jews — and still support the Jews despite having every right to lay the blame at the feet of Israel of Scripture — which today’s Jews certainly aren’t.
For the true white, Christian Israel, however, this is one hot potato we absolutely do want to hang on to — whether it burns or not — for historical, spiritual and prophetic reasons we will discuss.
THE EDOMITE BLAME GAME
Certain Christian circles insist on referring to today’s Jews as literal “Edom” — which they certainly aren’t either — while the Jews identify Christians as Edom — another demonstrable Talmudic deception.
Although it could well be argued that today’s Jews fulfill the role of spiritual Edom, their bloodline has been corrupted with so many other non-Israelite peoples among whom they’ve dwelt over the last 2,000 years that it would be difficult to identify them with any particular race of people.
Around 130AD the Judeans fomented the Bar Kokhba revolt, which the Roman emperor Hadrian put down quite effectively. Ever since that time, Talmudic writers began conflating Rome — and specifically Hadrian — with Edom — one of the proverbial enemies of the Israelites in Scripture. The late fourth century Jerusalem edition of the Talmud refers to this revolt in the context of Genesis 27:22,
So Jacob came close to his father Isaac, and he touched him and said, “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but the hands are the hands of Esau.”
Ta‘anit 4:6, 68d (part one)
Hadrian put down the rebellion for good in the final battle at Beitar fortress. The Talmud cites Genesis 27:22 as a prophetic reference to the voice of Israel — “the voice of Jacob” — crying out under the destruction of Beitar at the hands of Hadrian and the Romans — “the hands of Esau.”
Circular Talmudic “logic” consistently begs the question — a pernicious method of Scriptural interpretation that has infected many Christian doctrines — where only the imagination of the rabbi limits the possible interpretations of the Scripture — where his presumed agenda solely dictates his exegesis.
The Jews will readily acknowledge the Edomite ancestry of Herod the Great who conquered Judea in the name of Rome — thus tying Rome and Edom even more inextricably in their minds.
Incidentally, by the time the Jews first produced their Jerusalem Talmud — toward the end of the fourth century AD — Rome had already formally adopted Christianity as its own religion. Hence for the Jews, Rome and Christianity had become inextricably linked — so much so that whenever the rabbis refer to “Rome” in their Talmudic writings, they are actually referring to Christianity — an intentional rhetorical deception that allows them to heap calumny on Christians under the guise of “Rome.”
In a bizarre, ironic twist, Israelite Christians enter into this endless blame game with the Talmudic Jews — calling one another “Edomites” and ultimately claiming that prophecy against Edom promises the destruction of the other. As we have previously shown, Christians who identify Jews as Edomites utilize the same Talmudic exegetical method of Scripture — begging the question — that Jews use to identify white Christians as Edomites.
We can see that Tertullian — the early Christian Church father — used this same Talmudic reasoning when he wrote the following:
For thus unto Rebecca did God speak: Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples shall be divided from your bowels; and people shall overcome people, and the greater shall serve the less. Accordingly, since the people or nation of the Jews is anterior in time, and greater through the grace of primary favour in the Law, whereas ours is understood to be less in the age of times, as having in the last era of the world attained the knowledge of divine mercy: beyond doubt, through the edict of the divine utterance, the prior and greater people — that is, the Jewish — must necessarily serve the less; and the less people — that is, the Christian — overcome the greater.
Adversus Judaeos chapter 1
Tertullian here implies that Israel themselves are in fact Esau/Edom — a bizarre and especially Talmudic style of thinking. Following his twisted logic, Israel are not Israel — prophecy referring to Israel does not actually refer to Israel — but rather Edom refers to Israel.
Paul said to the nations, “do not be arrogant toward the branches [Israelites]” (Romans 11:18) — something Tertullian evidently ignored. However, Paul also said of Israel, “the name of God is blasphemed among the nations because of you.” (Romans 2:24) Thus we find that some of the nations would justify themselves against Israel — despite the error of doing so.
JEWS OR ISRAELITES?
In the decades in the wake of the Bar Kokhba revolt, the Israelites who rejected Christianity essentially gave up their Israelite heritage completely and became the very confused babylonian-inspired “religion” known today as “Judaism.” According to the Jews, their tribal and national origin gradually began to follow matrilineal descent — rather than patrilineal descent as the Old Testament clearly stipulates. Their Mishna — or oral traditions — first ratified their law of matrilineal descent in 200AD — about 70 years after the revolt.
To justify this shift in identity, the rabbis concocted the notion that Israelites allegedly had always been reckoned according to matrilineal descent. For example, consider Deuteronomy 7:3-4,
3 Furthermore, you shall not intermarry with them: you shall not give your daughters [your daughter] to their sons [his son], nor shall you take their daughters [his daughter] for your sons [your son]. 4 For they [he] will turn your sons [your son] away from following Me, and they will serve other gods; then the anger of the Lord will be kindled against you and He will quickly destroy you.
In these passages most translators add plurals and take a few liberties in an attempt to make the passage more understandable — yet we wouldn’t feel these liberties drastically alter the meaning of the passage — however, we have highlighted them above for the sake of this explanation.
The rabbis arbitrarily claim that the “he” in verse 4 is an explicit reference to a son-in-law — and the “son” in verse 4 is an explicit reference to a grandson. Here is what the rabbis conclude:
The verse states: “Neither shall you make marriages with them: Your daughter you shall not give unto his son, nor his daughter shall you take unto your son, for he will turn away your son from following Me” (Deuteronomy 7:3–4). This teaches that your son born from a Jewish woman is called your son, but your son born from a gentile woman is not called your son, but her son. The verse teaches that since the son of a gentile woman is her son alone, he is not considered related at all to his Jewish father.
Yevamot 23a
They will usually combine this with Ezra 10:3 which states that of all the foreigners Israel sent away, they sent only their wives away — because the children of non-Israelite women are not Israelites. Note how these two expositions never actually prove that Israelites are reckoned according to matrilineal descent — in each case they merely interpret the passages by presuming that their own premise is true — begging the question once again.
Who would read the Scripture and argue with the fact the Israelites are reckoned only according to patrilineal descent? Perhaps someone who is not an Israelite who wants to be reckoned as an Israelite? What this means is that modern day Jews tacitly admit that they are not Israelites — because they have not been tracking their alleged Israelite heritage according to the proper Scriptural means — patrilineal descent — for more than 1800 years.
Given that Jews have admitted they are not Israelites by adopting a matrilineal society, we can reasonably expect that other “evidence” of their Israelite identity will also be false. For example, modern Christianity and Jews alike see the formation of the ersatz country of “Israel” as the prophesied regathering of Israel from the nations made clearly in Deuteronomy 30:2-4,
2 and you return to the Lord your God and obey Him with all your heart and soul in accordance with everything that I am commanding you today, you and your sons, 3 then the Lord your God will restore you from captivity, and have compassion on you, and will gather you again from all the peoples where the Lord your God has scattered you. 4 If any of your scattered countrymen are at the ends of the earth, from there the Lord your God will gather you, and from there He will bring you back.
Note the precondition given in verse 2: “return to the Lord your God and obey Him.” To this end, the Lord Jesus says in Matthew 24:39,
For I say to you, from now on you will not see Me until you say, ‘Blessed is the One who comes in the name of the Lord!’
When Jesus says this, He has already made His triumphant entry into Jerusalem on the colt. Therefore, He is referring to His own return to Israel where He has stated that Israel must receive Him. As if this return isn’t obvious enough by this point, the Lord says in John 14:6,
I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father except through Me.
We would ask then: If the Jews reject the true Christ Jesus, how is it that they “returned to the Lord their God and obeyed Him” so that they could have been regathered? Obviously they didn’t — and so their own so-called “regathering” cannot be the true regathering of Israel. Again — in doing so, the Jews have admitted that they are not Israelites.
Therefore, accepting Jews as a regathered, true Israel — in spite of rejecting Christ Jesus — is an admission to their own apostate religion.
To further doom this idea of a regathered Israel in modern Jewry, the Lord Jesus Himself says in Matthew 24:31,
And He will send forth His angels with a great trumpet blast, and they will gather together His elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other.
When the “four winds” are mentioned, we can know this refers to Zechariah 2:6-7,
6 “You there! Flee from the land of the north,” declares the Lord, “because I have spread you out like the four winds of the heavens,” declares the Lord. 7 “You, Zion! Escape, you who are living with the daughter of Babylon.”
No doubt this is an end time prophecy — as even Revelation 7:1 says that the four winds are held back — and the earth spared — until the Lord seals the final remnant of Israel:
1 After this I saw four angels standing at the four corners of the earth, holding back the four winds of the earth so that no wind would blow on the earth, or on the sea, or on any tree.
We also find the reference to the “four corners of the earth” (Revelation 7:1) in Isaiah 11:12,
And He will lift up a flag for the nations And assemble the banished ones of Israel, And will gather the dispersed of Judah From the four corners of the earth.
Getting back to Matthew 24:31, we read of a great trumpet being blown in relation to a regathering of Israel from the nations in Isaiah 27:13,
It will come about also on that day that a great trumpet will be blown, and those who were perishing in the land of Assyria and who were scattered in the land of Egypt will come and worship the Lord on the holy mountain in Jerusalem.
Even by glossing over this topic, we can already conclude that Israel will be gathered only when the Lord Jesus returns. Therefore again, by claiming to be a regathered Israel, the Jews have admitted that they are not Israel.
Furthermore, we have shown in our exposition on Deuteronomy 23 that the child of an Adamic person and a non-Adamite will never be welcomed into the assembly of the Lord — a prohibition that the Jews blatantly ignore by allowing the father to be of any race only so long as the mother is “Jewish.”
This is another tacit admission that the Jews are not Israelites, because only pure white, Adamic people can be Israelites.
Over and above everything presented, a very explicit reference to a group who “say they are Jews” appears in Revelation 2:9,
I know your tribulation and your poverty (but you are rich), and the slander by those who say they are Judeans, and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
The Lord Jesus identifies a group that falsely claims to be Judeans but are actually a synagogue of Satan. In these modern times, there is really only one candidate for this prophecy: modern Jews. Incidentally, the true Christians Israelites of these modern times do not call themselves “Judeans” or “Jews” — only modern Jews do.
Continued at length;
https://christiansfortruth.com/israelites-killed-christ-and-why-we-must-stop-denying-it-and-blaming-others/
------
Fox.
