https://youtu.be/OUfZX-rI_1I?si=Hi8XLyf02QkyqoW1&t=43

I started this video about 45 seconds into the report, and as a heads-up towards the end, there is an interview by a mainstream media reporter that has no relevance to this report and doesn't need to be watched. That reduces this video to about apx. 10 to 12 minutes.

There are several key points brought up in this report:

* The special forces soldier could still be alive.

* The DNA didn't match his childhood DNA records

* There is a "sub" base in Area 51/S-4, Groom lake area

* The Chinese have acquired alien technology and have replicated it to have the ability to use anti-gravity craft in warfare, among other technology advances they possess

* The communist Chinese have been launching balloons and other craft for years in a massive surveillance program of the US

* The threat against the homeland is at the very highest level, including Washington, DC, that he called: "Check Mate"

* The situation with China is stable at this time, but if China invades Taiwan and the US/western nations respond with a defense, we could be at a direct war with communist China. This may be why China is spying over our military bases and missile sites, and prepositioning assets against the US.

At this time is not possible for me to make a judgement on these subjects without doing more research and seeking verification. At this time I can only speculate.
I have heard of sub bases being in places like Area 51, but have never taken it seriously. Is it possible? Yes, maybe - but is it probable? Without inside information I would only be guessing.

We do have very advanced, massive tunneling devices that make tunnels for miles in the US mainland. I even met and talked with a man that was employed to use them underground. But I have no idea how far they have tunneled and if there's a reason to have a "sub" base at Area 51.
My first instincts tells me it is improbable and unnecessary. What purpose what it serve? However, if I was given a valid reason for them tunneling that far from the ocean, I would be open to any credible reports on the subject.

What I am most concerned about is the report of Chinese subs launching hi-tech drones from the Atlantic to surveille/spy on the US mainland. The report of a launching "mothership " of some kind, involving China, was already reported by a US Congressman.

Keep in mind, to launch that many drones that have hi-tech abilities requires a nation-state with the man power, abilities and finances to make it possible.
This is not theory, fantasy or a wild conspiracy - it is a fact that the drones exist, have been seen by thousands of people, have had airports shut down, and caused military bases to be put on alert. And, secret briefings have been given to Trump on the subject, that he cannot divulge at this time.

The truth is, Biden has been "on the take" from China for many decades (this is a provable fact), and he won't defend Taiwan if China invades the island while he is in office. This is why, IMO, that the Whitehouse has been silent about the drone threat and the Chinese plans to take over Taiwan.

As it stands now Trump has given strong statements of a new trade policy with China that would include massive tariffs on their products. The Chinese may see that as an impending doom to their economic power and financial survival.
They may have already concluded that an invasion of Taiwan to capture their manufacturing strength, may as well be done now, while the window of opportunity is still open. If they wait until after Jan. 20th, they may believe their opportunity has slipped away.

In recent days I have been following many reports from China that tells of a current major economic downturn, another flu epidemic, and extensive military maneuvers that by all reports show an impending invasion of Taiwan. These facts confirm the genuine threat warning given by the Vegas bomber - that the US is facing a clear and present military danger from China.

But, without more solid, verified information it is only guess work at this time. The problem with rumors are, we seldom get "verification" until it is too late. George Eaton