https://www.lewrockwell.com/2024/12/lew-rockwell/why-naomi-wolf-is-great/

Why Naomi Wolf Is Great

By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

Naomi Wolf is a truly heroic figure, and the publication of her great book The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity makes her heroic stature even more evident than it was before. I’m not going to write a detailed review of the book, because it consists of thousands of documents that a lawsuit she initiated compelled Pfizer to release. I’ll just mention a few of the highlights. Pfizer knew a couple of months after its vaccine was ruled “safe and effective” by the FDA that the vaccine “risked heart damage in young men.” By the way, the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization ruling bypassed the usual FDA procedures, which require ten to twelve years of testing until a new vaccine is approved. Pfizer and other companies in Big Pharma had their bases covered, in case of lawsuits for damages. The PREP Act, passed in 2005, protects pharmaceuticals from liability for the use of so-called “medical counter-measures” in fighting a number of events, including pandemics. In other words, Big Pharma knew in 2005 that a pandemic was coming. As the great Murray Rothbard would have said, “The fix was in.” And, of course, getting the “vaccine” doesn’t protect people against Covid. ...

... She has also been heroic in defense of our right to keep and bear arms, and here once more her training in English literature came to her aid. Because she was thoroughly familiar with 18th century literary conventions, she was able to clarify the meaning of the Second Amendment. She says: “We [liberals] assumed all gun owners were driven by fear or by rage.

It certainly did not occur to us that anyone might enjoy marksmanship, or like being a collector, and that thus there might be good reasons to own more than one firearm.

We always interpreted the ownership of multiple weapons as a sign of mental instability. Obviously! Who would need more than one gun, we asked one another, even if one conceded that anyone needed a gun at all?

Living in safe (wealthy) neighborhoods, assuming that a stable democracy would last forever, and relying with our costly educations on talking above all, we could not fathom the ‘need’ for guns or for gun rights. ......