These nurses have forgotten their oath. I agree that if a patient is trying to harm you, you walk away. However, grow up and leave your politics at home! Most people don't agree with you. Pull up your big boy, or girl, panties and treat the patient that you're being paid to treat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath

Belle Carter – Natural News Aug 27, 2024

During the COVID scam, healthcare workers betrayed the public’s trust and flaunted it. Now the Royal College of Nursing has provided another example of how healthcare is being used to coerce the public.

A registered trade union for those in the profession of nursing in the U.K. has just issued new guidelines on situations where they can refuse to treat and withdraw care from patients and this includes clients who would oppose illegal migration because they deem them “racists.”

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) indicated in the Aug. 6 updated guidelines that some situations may justify refusing treatment, withdrawing care or finding an alternative.

“In response to comments made by Health Secretary Wes Streeting, we’ve updated our guidance on when and how members can refuse to treat a patient in their care. We recognize that every patient interaction is unique and this will be the most difficult decision for RCN members,” RCN said in a statement on its website.

“Migrant nursing staff (aka replacement staff) are members of our communities, hardwired into the very DNA of our health and care services. Our international colleagues are welcome, valued and owed a debt of gratitude.”

The guidelines indicate that nurses can decline and stop treating patients in the following circumstances:

“Where there exists, or there is fear of, physical violence; where there is discriminatory behavior, including racism; where there are health and safety hazards e.g. lack of appropriate equipment; where the care required is outside the scope of competence or training; where there is a conscientious objection, where the client/patient is known to you in a personal capacity and where you are asked to do something unlawful or in breach of the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) Code.”

Meanwhile, the Solicitor’s Regulatory Authority (SRA), the body responsible for regulating the professional conduct of more than 125,000 solicitors and other authorized individuals at more than 11,000 firms, as well as those working in-house at private and public sector organizations in England and Wales, is also following a totalitarian ideology mirrored in the new RCN guidelines.

Solicitor Lois Bayliss has been accused by the SRA of acting “against mainstream science” because she sent out anti-vaccine letters. The SRA alleged that for less than three weeks in February 2022, she sent letters to up to 450 individuals at up to 237 schools and general practitioner surgeries threatening that recipients would face criminal and civil liability.

Bayliss applied to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal to be allowed to adduce expert statements on medicine and ethics when her case is heard in September. Dr. Peter Fields said the solicitor had a right to use this evidence to defend herself in light of assumptions being made in the SRA’s case. But the tribunal rejected the application, urging both parties to focus on the nature of the allegations rather than enter into wider discussions about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines. SRA ruled that she needed to be able to bring experts who would provide an alternative view.

What happened with the SRA case is “consistent with the complete lack of debate permitted anywhere by any major government around the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and this appears to be an example of a supposedly independent institution doing the government’s dirty work in suppressing debate,” Expose‘s Rhoda Wilson commented.

Head over to MedicalTyranny.com to read more stories similar to this.

https://medicaltyranny.com/