Four Scripted Psy-ops, and Their Familiar Features

by Mary W Maxwell, LLB

Some people have been analyzing the assassination attempt of Trump as a psy-op. In this article I do not discuss the Trump case as I do not have sufficient information. Rather I will review some past cases. I have written, at book-length, about each of these four events: the Port Arthur massacre of 1996, Boston Marathon bombing of 2013, Sandy Hook School shooting of 2012, and the Lindt Cafe hostage-taking fandangle in Sydney, in 2014.

My research consisted largely of reading court documents. This differs from the standard method by which people watch YouTube videos and try to pick out tell-tale features. Here are some recurring features of the four events:

1. Legislation for gun control followed each case immediately, except the 2-14 Sydney case -- as Australians had already lost their gun rights, thanks to the 1996 Port Arthur case.

2. The baddy was a "lone gunman" in each case -- Martin Bryant, Adam Lanza, and Man Haron Monis -- except in Boston where two brothers were the baddies: Jahar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev. They were accused of setting off two bombs.

3. Two baddies died on the spot; Monis shot by police; Lanza by suicide, and Tamerlan was shot by cops four days later (on April 19) Two other survived "by mistake": Martin Bryant was left in a cottage, drugged, to which the police then set fire, but he unexpectedly staggered out. For the last 28 years he has been a prisoner, incommunicado. Jahar appears to have been slated for death -- 288 bullets were fired at his boat, but he survived. He has been on Death Row, for 11 years and is under SAMs -- special administrative orders -- can only phone his parents.

4. The media went to some trouble to tell us that each man was nuts, or was on a mission. The alleged motive for Bryant to kill 30 people was that he... um... I don't know. But there was a hint that he had murdered his Dad who had died 3 years earlier by drowning in a dam on their property. Lanza, too, had killed his mother, in her bed, just before going off to do the school shooting. Monis had walked the streets preaching Islam. Tamerlan was on either a mission to get Chechnya's independence from Russia, or to radicalize his fellow man. "As everyone knows, Muslims are jihadists with a grudge." Jahar was merely under the spell of his older brother.

5. Newspapers displayed photo-shopped pictures of Bryant and Lanza. With their "doctored" eyeballs, they did indeed look like mentally deranged.

6. Identification of the perpetrator at the crime scene was not sought by the usual means of fingerprints or DNA. The public was asked to assume that we all knew who did it. Who could doubt it? It was all over the papers, wasn't it? If you suggest that it may have been someone else, you are labeled paranoid.

7. The three dead baddies did not get a trial. Also, Bryant did not need one because he "confessed." Jahar had an elaborate trial at which his Public Defender confessed on his behalf, against his wishes. She did not seriously cross-examine any of the Prosecution's witnesses.

8. Each event has its memorial services on important anniversaries, with a dignitary, such as the governor (or in Sandy Hook's case, President Obama) reading a solemn message. Boston took care of the need for a memorial by creating lamppost-style sculptures on Boylston St. At Port Arthur, Queen Mary of Denmark is a patron of a project that memorializes the only two children who were killed that day.

9. Starting the day after each event, various websites solicit donations for the bereaved families, and in the Boston case, the amputees were paid a million dollars from a private fund.

10. Writers and movies makers have elaborated all four events over the years. Given that the two baddies who are in prison are not able to talk, they have not been able to contribute information to these artistic efforts and "investigative" books. Alas.

Discussion

In each of my books, except the Sydney case, I argued for the complete innocence of the "gunman." When you finally read the details, you can only be embarrassed (and, I hope, ashamed) of our gullibility, and angry toward prosecutors and judges who flout the law like it was going out of style. In two cases, Bryant and Jahar, I later put on a moot court for the accused and it was effortless to prove (yes, prove) their innocence.

The fact that judges deviate so far from court protocol tells me that they must know they are "required" by "somebody" to play along with a false game. So who is it that is "requiring" this of them. To whom do they answer? And why aren't academics screaming bloody murder? And why do legislators feel pressed to come up with the predictable new statutes that go against civil rights?

One possible answer is that all of those persons belong to some bad organization that we don't know about. I think that is a bit far-fetched, but it's worth considering. Note, for example that in each case many lives were lost. The three Muslim baddies (Monis and two Tsarnaevs) did not just kill someone (allegedly) during the event, they "caused" policy makers to increase our wars in the Middle East. Isn't it evil to do that?

And never mind, for now, that what the judges and lawyers do is itself evil -- they destroy the law, making it unavailable for our protection.

The other possibility, to explain all this garbage of scripted events, is that the persons whom I fault for not complaining about it (academics, lawyers, etc.) are truly brainwashed. They don't know they are doing wrong. To put it in simple terms, they are under hypnosis. In fact, they think they are doing good!

The other day I dredged up an old essay by a high-level CIA man, Gunther Russbacher. He gave us (before his 2005 death) some very detailed descriptions of how one's personality can get "written over" by a new personality with a completely different set of values! I mean Gunther was a superb whistleblower. (Thank you, Gunther.) He was the co-founder of RumorMillNews.com.

The article I wrote is linked below. It was meant to shed light on the claim that someone re-wrote the personality of the late John F Kennedy, Jr. After it was published, on July 10, 2024, we had the Trump event on July 13. So please note that I did not write it for the purpose of analyzing the assassination attempt (if that is what it was). But you can use my list of ten items above to see if anything rings a bell.

UPDATE: An hour ago, NBC News announced that Iran is planning to assassinate former US President Donald Trump.

Note: The books authored by me are: Port Arthur: Enough Is Enough (co-authored by Dee McLachlan); Inquest: Siege in Sydney; Boston's Marathon Bombing: What Can Law Do?; and The Human Mind and Sandy Hook's Unreality. (All currently available as free pdfs, and in paperback.)

The article on CIA mind control, mainly by Gunther Russbacher, is here: https://gumshoenews.com/mind-control-and-the-replacement-of-john-f-kennedy-jr/

-- Mary Maxwell can be reached at her website, www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com