The January 6th Invasion Was a Psy-op. The Hearings Are Part 2 of That Psy-op

by Mary Maxwell, PhD, LLB

As we can see from the 1992 book "Votescam," by Jim and Ken Collier, electronic cheating on election results has been happening since at least the 1980s. The two culprits in the Colliers' book are The League of Women Voters (!) and the News Election News Service.

The latter was a private group of the three TV networks plus Associated Press. (CNN did not yet then exist). The NES is the entity that announced the vote count after each election, usually right after the polls closed. They were in a position to make up the figures, and they did.

Jim Collier passed his findings to Robert Mueller, the then assistant US Attorney General. (Note: Mueller came on duty as head of the FBI a few weeks before 9-11 and left shortly after the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing. He is in need of indictment over both those events.)

Mueller did not answer Collier. But his pet, Keeney, answered, with the usual slogan "Our findings do not show criminality." I shall call that "the Keeney slogan," as it is used a lot and needs a handle. Its content is meaningless. To say "We found no evidence of foul play" does not mean the matter was investigated properly.

Unfortunately, in the mind of the public, the Keeney slogan suffices as a formal declaration that So-and-So has been actually cleared of guilt. Can you imagine! What a trick.

Now to the 2020 election. I myself was a presidential candidate in the Republican presidential primary in New Hampshire on that nice cold day in February. I got 929 votes, compared to Trump who got 129,734. New Hampshire does not fool around, so I think those figures are accurate -- Donald was a popular incumbent president and Mary was a well-meaning housewife (or something).

Still, an expert could probably hack some votes without the election officials being aware of it. Maybe someone "softwared" me into those 929 votes -- maybe I received only 50 votes. I know I got at least one, since I voted for myself. Had they announced that Mary Maxwell got no votes, I would have demanded a recount..

When Is a Psy-op Not a Psy-op?

A psy-op is a psychological operation -- an unreal story promulgated to influence the nation's feelings. In the United States there have been many psy-ops, not least 9-11.

Two psy-ops that I have looked into are the 2012 massacre of children at Sandy Hook school (it did not happen) and the death of Tamerlan Tsarnaev on April 19, 2013, reportedly by his brother having driven over him with a carjacked SUV (it did not happen). I have written at book-length about those two cases, mainly by examining legal documents.

(The books are: "Unreality: Sandy Hook Messes Minds" and "Boston's Marathon Bombing: What Can Law Do." Both are free downloads at my website ConstitutionAndTruth.com, and so is my 2011 book "Prosecution for Treason: Epidemics, Weather War, Mind Control and the Surrender of Sovereignty." Whistleblowers risk death, but I can't seem to stay my hand from playing with these things. So I die, I die -- big dingo. It's better than going along with the lying.)

A psy-op would be so easy to carry out in regard to the election of Joe Biden. The basics would consist of having the media, in the lead-up to the November 3, 2021 election, purvey the idea that Trump was losing. Then when he "lost" it wouldn't raise eyebrows. If the man himself started to fuss, this would be attributed to his ego problem -- you know, Trump lives in a fantasy and just can't accept the bad news that he lost. Silly old coot.

Still, there is YouTube, and before you know it, disgruntled citizens were reporting the blockage they had experienced at the polls on November 3rd. I recall at least two unassailable presentations about the cheating. One was by a Mrs Grubbs in Georgia who said a shredding company came to take away the ballots kept at an unauthorized location -- she filmed it. (To the credit of Georgia's legislators, it was they who gave Mrs Grubbs some airtime.)

The other complainer was an Indian lady in Michigan who had worked as a volunteer at the vote-count. I don't recall exactly what she said but it had to do with ballots showing up from "nowhere."

The disgruntlement put a spanner in the works of the psy-op. Before long, Mike Lindell, of pillow fame, turned the information into a 2-hour documentary about vote-stealing. (There is also the decisive movie "2000 Mules" made by Dinesh D'Souza from the work of a Texas group "TrueTheVote," but this did not get seen by the public till May 2, 2022.)

Thus, thanks to citizen arousal, more would have to be done to "validate" the Biden inauguration.

I Propose That the January 6th Invasion Was a Psy-op

So far in this article I have spoken from fact, but please note that I am now switching into speculation mode. I wish to offer, for anyone's consideration, that the January 6 invasion was planned as a psy-op, the purpose being to deflect attention from the stolen election.

(Personally, I assume George Floyd's death in May 2020 was planned as a psy-op. That means someone arranged for him to be killed, for the purpose of starting the Black Lives Matter riots of 2020. In other words, I work backwards -- from the fallout, to the original event. This is a "cui bono" type approach. Ask who gained, in the long run.)

The idea of January 6 as a psy-op, a psychological operation on the American people, came to me last week while watching media reports of the January 6th hearings. That is, the hearings being held by a Select Committee of the US House of Representatives.

Let me step back a moment to express my disgust with Congress for playing Party games -- on both sides of the aisle -- in regard to the two impeachments of Trump. The first, in 2020, had to do with his "Russian collusion" (remember that?). The second occurred in 2021, two weeks before he left office. On strictly Party lines, the House Dems impeached Trump and on strictly Party lines the Senate Repubs refused to convict.

In fact, the Republican senators voted to not listen to evidence! Sorry, not good enough. I myself am not pro-Trump, but impeachment is a serious constitutional power of Congress and should be carried out responsibly.

So, you can imagine that I condemn the Jan 6 hearings. The Speaker of the House has selected a committee that has seven Democrat members and two Republicans, both of whom are virulently anti-Trump. Also, the House is inviting selected witnesses. Why don't they just call Dinesh D'Souza or Mike Lindell or Sidney Powell, who at least have information to give. (Powell has a 267-page collection of the goods on the 2020 election.)

They are laying it on so thick, to blame then-president Trump for causing the Invasion, that it began to look (to me) like they "needed" the Invasion. Hence my speculation: Certain people, who stole the election for Biden, and made the Invasion happen, are worried about getting caught and so have to turn up the heat on Trump.

The hearings are saying that the Invasion occurred BECAUSE Trump ordered his followers to invade. Clearly he did not order anyone to invade but you could be forgiven for thinking he did if all you watch is mainstream TV.

Now ask: If Trump -- or "Trump supporters" -- did not cause the invasion, who did? This is not being looked at, at all, by the Select Committee.

Adam Schiff Doth Protest Too Much

On June 25, 2022, I wrote an article at GumshoeNews.com, speculating that Rep Adam Schiff is a player in the planning of the invasion. I called him, at least potentially, an insurrectionist. I said:

"For [there to be] a show trial, there would need to have been an Invasion of the Capitol, to make it work. If this show trial ends up discouraging Americans from thinking that they have a government worth saving, that could amount to an insurrection, I claim. I think somebody may be wanting to take away the government, the Constitution, the whole shebang."

I then quoted from Schiff's June 25, 2022 Facebook page. It discusses the Fourth Hearing, with testimony by Rusty Bowers, Arizona's Speaker of the House, who said he was asked to overturn the 2020 election results of his state. On prompting from Schiff, Bowers read from his [alleged] journal of December 2020:

“I do not want to be a winner by cheating. I will not play with laws I swore allegiance to with any contrived desire towards deflection of my deep foundational desire to follow God’s will, as I believe he led my conscience to embrace. How else will I ever approach Him in the wilderness of life, knowing that I ask this guidance only to show myself a coward in defending the course he led me to take.”

I asked: "What politician writes like that in his journal?"

(Actually, Jahar Tsarnaev wrote like that in his wholly scripted boat confession, using a pencil on fiber glass, remember? It was Allah this and Allah that, though no friend of Jahar had ever found him to be religios.)

The Murder of Mike Pence on January 6?

The hearings have also turned to the allegation that Trump wanted his vice president to help Trump's cause by rejecting some of the Electoral votes, which he, Pence, would ceremoniously receive on January 6 from the states' electoral colleges.

As far as I know, Trump would only have requested that Pence oversee (in Pence's proper constitutional role as president of the Senate) the objections to the electoral vote count, that any member of Congress may wish to make. The independent media had noted, on January 5th, that 139 Reps intended to make such challenges. Nothing amiss there (see 3 USC 15). But the hearings are making it sound as though Pence was ordered to change the vote count himself by rejecting some state's electoral ballots outright.

Even more inventively, the hearings are trying to make it look as though Trump incited the murder of Pence. Wait a minute! You can't have it both ways. You can't accuse Trump of urging his VP to be on duty for him in the Halls of Congress, and at the same time say Trump was plotting that the rioters go at Pence with bayonets or whatever.

I give credit to the script writers for trying this trick, and again I forgive members of the TV audience who now think Trump is a murderer, but this tangential issue has no merit, no logic.

Gotta Love that Raffensperger Phone Call

I don't want to put any more of my waning days into discussing January 6, as we need to get on with the real emergencies out there. But in hopes of finishing this thing off, I point to the House hearings as being dead dishonest when it comes to the way they portray the "phone call to Georgia."

I mistakenly thought -- from media coverage -- that Trump's call to a Georgia official (Brad Rappensperger, Secretary of State) had been eavesdropped. But no, it was recorded by the White House and full transcript make available to the Washington Post. It fully exonerates Trump (and the Mrs Grubbs's of this world). I will quote just one paragraph:

"President Trump: We’re going to have an accurate number over the next two days with certified accountants. But an accurate number will be given, but it’s in the 50s of thousands — and that’s people that went to vote and they were told they can’t vote because they’ve already been voted for. And it’s a very sad thing. They walked out complaining. But the number’s large. We’ll have it for you. But it’s much more than the number of 11,779 that’s — the current margin is only 11,779. Brad, I think you agree with that, right? That’s something I think everyone — at least that’s a number that everyone agrees on."

In sum, Folks, what we're looking at was not a Mafia-like shakedown of the Georgia official. As in "Hand over the 11,00 votes that I need and nobody gets hurt, OK?"

A Word about Watergate

Some have praised the Jan 6 hearings for their importance "like the Watergate hearings." But wait -- the Watergate hearings were a psy-op, too. We all got suckered. The mocking of Tricky Dick that was well carried by the press should have been a clue. (I mean the fact that the press was anti-Nixon should have alerted us, as it does today, to the fact that the Powers That be wanted to grab the White House.)

Nixon's forced resignation in 1974 was conveniently preceded by Spiro Agnew's forced resignation which put Gerald Ford into the "heartbeat" seat. The point of this was to get Ford into the White House where he could appoint Nelson Rockefeller as VP. It worked; so Watergate was successful!

Had Nelson Rockefeller not "died in the saddle," he would have worked himself up to president via the 25th amendment. He had been a voice in the drafting of that amendment which was ratified in 1967.

As we can now see, the Watergate break-in was itself a psy-op, like the January 6 invasion. Just watch the first minute and a half of the Watergate hearings to get the flavor. Senator Sam Erwin must have been part of the game:

Isn't it nice, today, that we have grown up, so we don't have to put up with that kind of "sincere" tomfoolery anymore? Let's have a celebration of America's reaching its maturity!

-- Mary Maxwell is currently a Republican candidate for US House of Reps from New Hampshire's first district. She looks forward to hearing from the fighting Irish, so to speak, at MaxwellMaryLLB@gmail.com.