If all a president had to do was hand over control of our country to some slimeball organization, like the WHO, don't you think that would have been accomplished a long time ago? Our Founding Fathers were not stupid. They knew there would come a time when nefarious actors would try to invalidate our Constitution. That is why passing laws and changing amendments is so difficult.

No matter how hard the Libtards try to install the New World Order, it would still have to pass through the halls of Congress, both Houses with a very high percentage of support, before it would happen. And, even if the conservative Republican Senators could be swayed to side with the lunatics on the left, it has already been decreed that:

"T%he U.S. Constitution is the law of the land and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement with the Constitution. It is impossible for a law which violates the Constitution to be valid." This is succinctly stated as follows:

"All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Crunch) 137,174, 176, (1803)

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."
Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

Politicians and bureaucrats would have you believe that too much freedom will result in chaos. Therefore, we should gladly give up some of our rights for the good of the community. This is the BS story the Globalists have been trying and will continue to try to cram down our throats. It is socialist/Marxist thinking.

Of course, it doesn't include those in power as we witnessed during the COVID madness over the last two years. Lockdowns and social distancing didn't apply to them as anyone watching Deborah Birx, Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates observed.

This is also behind the attempt to write a treaty with the UN or the WHO, handing over the control of determining what is a pandemic, a real danger to the world, so the WHO can use their power to lockdown a country, mandate vaccines for everyone forever, decide when the danger has passed.

People acting in the name of government, say we need more laws to enforce already established laws, even if we have to give up some rights in the process. They believe the more laws that hamstring us, the more control, thus a better society. This theory may sound good on paper, and apparently many of our leaders think this way. But, no matter how cleverly this Marxist argument is made, the truth is that whenever you give up a right, you lose a free choice; a freedom.

More laws do not make less criminals, as anyone living in a blue city could tell you. Putting the WHO in charge of global health would have the same effect. That is way too much power in one person's hands. And don't for one nano-second believe that Tedros will be pulling the strings. He is a mindless robot, answering to those in the WEF.

I would say, pay attention to the way your Representatives and Senators vote on this issue. If they vote in favor of turning over control of our nation's health and subsequent freedoms, do not vote for them again. campaign against them. They are traitors to their country and the oaths they took. And, remember:

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human liberty; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt