All part of the script, my friends, all part of the lefty script.

Lynda

**************************

BY

Our Spirit - AIM

Apr 24

Meet John Barker, Esq., the British Crown spy banker who handled Alexander Hamilton and whose banking progeny are ripping America apart today

Hamilton betrayed America to British banks during the Revolution just like the communist left is doing today.

Queen Hillary Clinton is effusive in her praise of the Hamilton musical. So much praise, in fact, that Shakespeare might be tempted to re-write Queen Gertrude’s observation in Hamlet: ‘The lady doth praise too much, methinks.’ She said in her last campaign that “we may not live to see the glory” as the song from the musical Hamilton goes, “let us gladly join the fight.” Let our legacy be about “planting seeds in a garden you never get to see.”

What kind of Hamilton-seeds are Hillary and her ilk planting?

Turns out, before the Rothschilds and Barings was John Barker, Governor of the Crown-chartered monopoly London Assurance Company, secretly bankrolled America’s first banks championed by his Crown Agent, Alexander Hamilton. (The Warburgs predate them all).

Apr. 21, 2022—Our investigations into Alexander Hamilton reveal that his seeds were sedition on behalf of the British Crown.

Hamilton secretly sold out America to British banks during the Revolution—while he was a staffer for General George Washington.

Remarkably, historians whitewash these facts and excuse his traitorous actions in the fog of war and social upheaval. Both are true, but Hamilton’s secret pre-Rothschild banking agenda with Britain profoundly betrayed our nascent country. Its effects plague us today.

Even historian Ron Chernow, whose history of Alexander Hamilton was used as the basis for the musical, equivocates on the historical accuracy of the Hamilton script.

Curiously, the musical opens with a conflated relationship among Alexander Hamilton, Marques de Lafayette and Henry Laurens that was inaccurate as chronology, but likely accurate as a gay-lover triad. Homoerotic indulgences were and still are a seminal hidden agenda among self-anointed British and American elitists.

How many gay guys conspiring does it take to cripple an emerging republic? Answer: Three.

Alexander Hamilton, Marquis de Lafayette and Henry Laurens enjoyed each other’s company deeply as described in numerous intimate letters that historians describe as evidently “homoerotic.”

Fresh research is revealing Hamilton’s demon seeds—hidden by a flurry of British Crown historians who downplay or ignore the treachery-elephant in the room: Alexander Hamilton pressed bank fraud for Great Britain led by the demons Mammon (love of money) and Moloch (slavery, child sacrifice).

Even historian Ron Chernow, whose history of Alexander Hamilton was used as the basis for the musical, equivocates sheepishly on the historical accuracy of the Hamilton script, deferring to poetic license as justification for seminal inaccuracies, knowing full well that most of the audience will rely on it as truth history for their opinions of Hamilton the man.

Totally missing from the musical historicity is the fact that Hamilton injected himself, as an evident Crown Agent, into the formation and policy of America’s first banks, fiat currency, usury and debt slavery:

Bank of North America (1781)

Bank of New York (1784)

First Bank of the United States (1791)

The Manhattan Company (1799)

Spy Alexander Hamilton orchestrated British control of American banking from the inception of the Republic

Hamilton’s work to dominate the formation of banks in the new American Republic was unmatched.
Hamiltonopolis

Hamilton advocated unrelentingly for the capital to be in New York. Chernow writes, “It was becoming so associated with Hamilton that his enemies branded it ‘Hamiltonopolis.’ For many southerners, Jefferson in particular, New York City was an Anglophile bastion dominated by bankers and merchants who would contaminate the republican experiment. These critics equated New York with the evils of London.” (Chernow, p. 325).

More than a few historians have questioned Hamilton’s motives and impartiality. As Hamilton’s four banks progressed, the complaints in New York circulated that “it became at length impossible for men engaged in trade to advocate republican sentiments without sustaining material injury . . . As the rage and violence of party increased, [bank] directors became more rigorous in enforcing their system of exclusion.”

“No type of corporation was more suspect than a bank . . . It was Republican dogma to be wary of an increase in business corporations which symbolized, as they had for a long time in England, monopoly power, speculative profit seeking, and moneyed influence.” Ruebens, p. 580)

So, much more on link with research links included.