How To Really Help Your Vaccine Un-hesitant Friends
by Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
We all know that there is a brick wall, created by mainstream media, that separates citizens from the truth about the harmful side effects of the Covid vax. We also know that folks are so scared that their normal curiosity is turned off. Members of your family may act hostile if you bring up the "conspiracy theory."
Happily, someone at Truth.info.docs has made a 30-minute video (from 6 short clips) to explain how Pfizer knew of harms but kept it secret. This video can easily be sent, by you, to your local cable or public TV stations.
It is part of FCC's job to ensure that the airwaves are open to local content. Most stations play submitted programs once or twice a week for 4 weeks. So, if people miss one broadcast, they have several other opportunities to view it.
The speakers on this careful video don't mention woo-woo stuff like graphene or transhumanism, much less discuss the theory that there is no virus, much less utter the word that rhymes with tenocide.
Local cable access stations are paid for by resident tax dollars and are there for us to use. Please go to the trouble of sending the link. There's no point in us preaching only to the choir -- the choir is already unlikely to be killed by a vax.
Dear Citizens, I offer you my wording to save you some time. Edit it to your heart's content:
To: [Your local station]
From [Your real name and address]
Greetings!
I hereby submit a 30-minute video on an important public health and safety issue for you to broadcast. It is found here:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jm4tFKaV8Ri7/
Don't worry, it's not misinformation or offensive but instead is evidence-based. It discusses Informed Consent in regard to vaccinations.
It was compiled by Truth.info.docs from the following six clips:
-- Attorney Thomas Renz regarding prior knowledge of injury risk, lack of disclosure and informed consent.
-- An excerpt from Dr. Therese Long's testimony regarding being retaliated against after expressing concerns over vaccine-injured pilots.
-- Dr. Robert Malone's interview with Candace Owens discussing DOD whistleblowers and DOD health database evidence of large increase in several health conditions in 2021 (248% to 1,000%).
-- a 16-minute animated CHD video regarding lack of full safety testing, list of injuries caused, vax manufacturers exempt from liability, no proof that the jabs prevent transmission.
-- a short RFK video of Robert f Kennedy, Jr, questioning the causes of soaring number of childhood illnesses and disability and the big business interests he's up against.
-- a short video showing Pfizer's extensive list of criminal convictions.
Important Question: Is this video a censorable "anti-vax" piece? Nope. It doesn't make any statements that are "anti-vax". Instead, it's pro-truth, pro-evidence, pro-safety, and pro-Hippocratic oath.
It's against the lack of full safety-testing and discusses the millions of injuries and deaths caused to people worldwide.
Note: The makers of the combined video have encouraged everyone to spread it as far and wide as possible. As for the intellectual property of the speakers, this material, when used for education, is Fair Use under Copyright law.
[ End of proposed letter ]
To get the word out even further, I suggest that you write a letter to local community newspapers, letting people know about the broadcast. Perhaps do so towards the end of the third week of airing just in case it results in the program being pulled. At least that way it will have been broadcast a few times ....
How to know who your local broadcaster is? I got mine by googling "public broadcaster, Concord NH." It worked. My friend got hers by entering "Local cable access, Sacramento."
Update on Court Precedents on Mandatory Vax
You may recall that there was, or seemed to be, a US Supreme Court decision revoking Biden's demand for federal employees to get jabbed. Well, not exactly. SCOTUS sent the matter back to the lower courts and now it appears that the honeymoon is over. The jab requirement may be back on.
I am here to say that SCOTUS has never yet ruled on the unconstitutionality -- per the Fourth Amendment -- of any vaccination mandate. This is a gaping hole in jurisprudence.
My appeal on that topic was dismissed at the First Circuit (Maxwell v Secretary of Defense). I will re-post my brief below. It's shocking that there has not been any ruling on mandatory jab as being repugnant to this basic right:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….”
(I say, have you been feeling secure in your person lately?)
Scholars who have not done their homework allude to the 1905 case of Jacobson v Massachusetts as representing the okay-ness of mandatory jab. Forget it! The SCOTUS ruling of that time held that a state had a right to fine the citizen who refused a smallpox vax, but it expressly left open the possibility of a different ruling if things got oppressive.
I quote:
“Before closing this opinion we deem it appropriate, in order to prevent misapprehension as to our views, to observe ... that the police power of a state ... may be exerted in such circumstances, or by regulations so arbitrary and oppressive in particular cases, as to justify the interference of the courts to prevent wrong and oppression….”
Thank you, O Judges of a hundred and seventeen years ago. And would the current Nine please sign in?
O Citizens of today, the judges may later be blamed for 2022's deaths. But you can avoid being blamed by writing to your Public Broadcasting office, as described above.
Go on, do it before dinner. This is desperate stuff.
