My Wrap-Up of Two Years of Covid and Its Future Portent

by Mary W Maxwell,PhD, LLB

We aren't far off from the second anniversary of a global event intruding into our daily lives: the Covid pandemic, so-called. Covid-19 made its medical debut in China in December 2019 (hence the "19" in its label). Then, in March 2020, it was declared an "international health emergency" by the WHO. And now, in late January 2022, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has announced that his government will lift all the restrictions related to Covid.

So, what happened during those two years? Who were the players? What is the current understanding of the pandemic? What does it portend for the future?

I have entitled this article "My" Wrap-Up to emphasize its personal quality. It is naturally limited by the limitations of my knowledge (I can't tell an antibody from a bar of soap, for example). It's also limited by my prejudices. That word comes from pre-judice, to make a judgement before hearing the whole case. I brought several prejudices to my analysis, especially from my 2013 book, Consider the Lilies, on the suppression of cures for cancer.

All of the following subjects, and more, appear in the analysis of Covid. They hadn't been present in our life until recently:

The New Normal: mask wearing, the lockdowns, quarantine, hand sanitizers, curbside delivery, social distancing, vax passports, food shortages, closeouts of small businesses, state border closures, families divided, Tabletop exercise, anal swabs, full-on propaganda, landlords prevented from evicting tenants, bailouts of industries.

Civil Rights Issues: no-jab-no-fly, disinformation by MSM, vaccine hesitancy, censorship of social media, soldiers giving vaccinations, religious exemptions from vaccination being withheld, protestors pepper-sprayed, internment camps, chipping, digitalization, surveillance, trace-and-track.

Medical Questions: new variants, unlimited boosters, natural immunity, 5g involvement, "emergency use," myocarditis, gene therapy, symptomless cases, athlete deaths, withholding of ivermectin and HCQ, bioweapons, genocide, mass formation psychosis, magnetism of skin, gain-of-function.

Organizations in the news: Gates Foundation, the WEF (World Economic Forum), Rockefeller Foundation, Big Pharma, the WHO, GAVI, Johns Hopkins University, the CDC, Fauci's NIH, State Health Ministries, the FDA and TGA (Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration).

My Brief Wrap-up of the Protest: the Dramatis Personae

Doctors and scientists speaking out: Rashid Buttar, Vernon Coleman, Dolores Cahill, Simone Gold, Judy Mikovits, Kary Mullis (from the grave), Bhakdi Sucharit, Erik Enby, Peter McCullough, Pierre Kory, Wolfgang Wodarg, Lorraine Day, Len Horowitz.

Lawyers speaking out: Robert F Kennedy, Jr, David E Martin, Rocco Gilati, Reiner Feullmich, Francis Boyle, Kent Heckenlively. (Cough, cough, where are the other nine thousand?)

Activists speaking out: Claire Edwards, Pamela Popper, Peggy Hall, Qantas pilot Captain Hood, two New South Wales police officers (a male and a female, both brilliant), portfolio advisor Catherine Austin Fitts, Kathy Dopp.

Academics speaking out: um... er...um ... Mark Crispin Miller

Litigants filing complaints: Mary Maxwell for example, sued the Secretary of Defense and appealed her dismissal-for-lack-of-standing. I received the First Circuit Court's "affirmation" of the District Court's dismissal yesterday (Australia Day), January 26, 2022. (See the text of my appeal, linked below)

Journalists speaking out: Dee McLachlan, Jonathon Rappoport, Paul Craig Roberts, Jim Corbett, James Perloff, Stew Peters, Spiro Skouras, Josh Rogan, Jane Ruby.

Politicians and officials speaking out:, Governor of North Dakota Kristi Noem, Oregon's A-G Ellen Rosenblum, US Sen Rand Paul, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, US Sen Ron Johnson, Aus Sen Pauline Hanson, Aus Party leader Ricardo Bosi, Aus Rep Greg Kelley. Let us not forget Tanzania president John Magufuli, R.I.P.

Military people speaking out:
Oops, I just went to MilitaryTimes.com to snatch a few names but I got this instead:

“We’re going to make sure that every individual who has reservations about taking the vaccine, for whatever reason, is properly counseled about the safety and the efficacy of the vaccines, and the health risks for not taking it,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters in August. “As well as counseling the readiness impact of not taking it ― the impact that an individual would be having on his or her teammates.”

Clergy speaking out: Bishop Carlo Vigano.

The above lists are really much longer, I have only spouted the more famous names.

Analysis of the Real Purpose of the Pandemic

Surely the Covid event was all a big, well-planned game. Surely it was not the natural emergence of a new virus or the species-jumping of a bat virus. We know from a booklet published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2014 that all the details of this pandemic were accounted for, before it began. (See my book "Keep the Republic, Kill the Takeover.")

Is it provable that there was malfeasance involved? Yes. There is incontrovertible circumstantial evidence that governments were told to put a lock on ivermectin and some other good medications. Ivermectin had been in use for decades with good results on patient's respiratory system, and no bad results.

There is also the fact of President Trump's ordering Operation Warp Speed to give the big vaccine manufacturers a chance to come up with a vaccine, which they then produced in an impossible time frame (less than a year).

There was also the tossing out of normal protocols in clinical trials of a new drug. The short time frame would make some symptoms invisible as they would not occur in less than a year.

There is also the fact that children were not at risk yet there was a move, with undue haste, to get 12-year-olds vaccinated. In some places this was allowed without parent's approval.

There is the boastful book, Covid-19: The Great Reset, by Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret, that gladly shows how the pandemic and its lockdowns will result in a new, centrally-run economy. It will (rejoice! rejoice!) put paid to Mom and Pop businesses.

There is the almost complete abandonment, in the US, of the traditional argument for privacy of one's body. We did not see anyone in Congress throwing down the gauntlet over this essential factor.

There has been little legal attention to the pandemic's assault on free speech. Entire websites get taken down by various owners of the airwaves as though we are to accept their right to judge medical matters and "public safety" without question.

There was an amazing lack of chitchat regarding the judicial aspects of the pandemic. Eventually two cases came limping in to the US Supreme Court, the one opposing President Biden's vax mandate for healthcare workers paid by Medicare and Medicaid, and the one opposing his bizarre order for companies with more than 100 employees to mandate the vax. None of the nine justices referred to the Constitution's Fourth Amendment.

Is it genocide? I believe the purpose of the pandemic was threefold: to kill off or disable a large percent of the population, to reduce everyone to subservience to a harsh central government (what a jerky idea), and to make life nice for the elite.

The Sudden Eagerness of the Public To Be Obedient

We oldies were taken aback by the willingness of people to submit to the pandemic's rules. Granted, many individuals and families showed their objection by coming out to rallies on the streets of big cities, but many did not.

It is a worry that of the group who "believe in" the pandemic, there is an unwillingness to listen to reason. For example, you should be able to talk to them calmly like this: "Hello neighbor, are you aware that during a clinical trial of a new drug, if many patients die, the trial gets called off and the drug fails to get the stamp of approval. But here the FDA and CDC said 'Fine! We like it!' This worries me. Does it worry you?"

Or you could say: "Hey, remember when our countrymen died willingly to secure our rights to petition the government? Recently Attorney General Merrick Garland recommended that we deem as a 'domestic extremist' any parent who disrupts a school board meeting to query the vax policy. Isn't that phantasmagorical? Did you ever think you would live to hear of such a thing?"

I know of several neighborhoods where you not only can't have such a conversation, you are considered unAmerican if you try it. Indeed there are plenty of families that now shun a member for being vaccine hesitant. (Or genocide hesitant as the case may be.)

We were brought up to understand that Eastern Europe, aka the Soviet Union, brutally caused people to have to bend to the government's wishes (down to the finickiest detail). We also learned that in Communist China, especially during Mao's Cultural Revolution (circa 1966), people were dragged off to a Re-education camp for committing Thought Crime. But now it's a thought crime to say "I don't think Covid is really all that dangerous."

Some analysts are saying that the people are suffering from a mass psychosis. I have heard the hypothesis that we were first "softened up" for the Covid restrictions by forces that helped to make people feel insignificant. That makes sense! How significant do you feel?

And the family structure has undergone a weakening. And so has patriotism. The cartoons of Biden today are unbelievably demeaning. I guess it would have been easy for Tavistock to measure our vulnerability to having a nice Big Daddy (the CDC) come along and "protect" us. Still, I find it staggering.

Amazon sells dolls of Tony Fauci -- and they're not cheap either. So there must be a market for them.

What Does All This Portend for Our Future?

How can anyone know what is going to happen? I think it is logical to say "If somebody up there is so callous as to give people a disease, or death, via a vaccination (perhaps delaying the reaction to disguise it), we should realize they have no limits on their ambitions." It is reasonable for us to assume the worst.

I suppose we won't get anywhere with the Believers, and should not even try. They are too scared as it is, without imagining anything worse. (Deep down they probably do realize what's going on, though.)

I personally do not have a strategy. I keep thinking I've got the secret formula in my pocket, that being the rollback of the protection of powerful from criminal prosecution. Even a few medium-fry would be portentous for the rest. It has been a surprise to see Prince Andrew getting closer to a day in court -- though that could all be a trick.

Beats me why Reiner Feullmich has directed his prosecutorial activity toward the ICC. The fact-checkers at Reuters offer this small criticism, dated March 2021:

"Social media users sharing posts that say the International Criminal Court (ICC) has 'accepted' a complaint that claims Israel’s COVID-19 vaccination programme violates the Nuremberg Code are missing vital context. Anyone can submit information about alleged crimes to the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) – and the OTP has cautioned that acknowledgment of receipt is not the same as a decision on the merits of the information."

But that's not my objection. It's the use of the category "crimes against humanity." Sure, it sounds nice, but that is not a crime anywhere but at the ICC (as far as I know). Why not just go for GBH? Those who are ill from the vax have received Grievous Bodily Harm, and those who are dead have received either homicide or manslaughter.

Not to mention the massive financial fraud that has gone on.

That said, the amount of hustle and bustle is very encouraging. Recall my December 31, 2021 GumshoeNews.com article on quorum sensing -- as in other species, humans can sense when there enough members ready to take action and risk death.

Bulletin! Is This Stuff Related to the "Ukrainian Crisis"?

It has been suggested that the vaxxers are now in deep doo-doo and that a war is being started to distract from their guilt. If that is so, it needs to be aired urgently! What an old trick, starting a war to take our minds off something else afoot...

The link below is my Fourth Amendment argument against the 1905 Jacobson precedent in matters vax. Yay!