Judicial Watch: Trial on Constitutionality of California’s Gender Quotas for Corporate Boards Scheduled for December 1 (just received)

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced a California Superior Court trial for December 1 in a taxpayer lawsuit challenging constitutionality of California’s gender quotas for corporate boards of directors (Robin Crest et al. v. Alex Padilla (No.19STCV27561)). The trial is expected to last three weeks and will take place in a Los Angeles courtroom

Judicial Watch filed the lawsuit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in 2019, on behalf of California taxpayers, Robin Crest, Earl De Vries and Judy De Vries. The lawsuit challenges a 2018 law, known as Senate Bill 826, which requires every publicly held corporation headquartered in California to have at least one director “who self-identifies her gender as a woman” on its board of directors by December 31, 2019. The law also requires corporations to have up to three such persons on their boards by December 31, 2021, depending on the size of the board.

More at the link below:
https://www.judicialwatch.org/ca-gender-trial-dec1/?
-------------------------------------
Dear RM Agents and Readers,

It shouldn't matter if you are white, black, asian, American India, etc, Unless in the previous you are a communist (that matters!) Race, gender to choose from these for a board is ridiculous, it is better to choose the right person with the best knowledge for the board. Then you must have to have a person who can work with others and is not a psychopath or sociopath.

Good people works for me. Of course if it is a board discussing tampons that should be taken into account as would a board discussing the making of a jock strap! Common Sense people that is what we need brought back to this world, common sense, being reasonable and being kind and knowing when to stand your ground!!!

Many Blessings,

CrystalRiver