[With all the lawyers out there you'd think that someone would have challenged this issue in a court by now, especially when it comes to the mandates - that are only "legal" with a fully approved vaccine. Maybe that's the case and the media is doing a really good job of hiding that information. Regardless, my guess is we'll be seeing more on this issue in the coming weeks . . . SC]

By John O'Sullivan - September 28, 2021

It seems so many people still remain fooled by the media’s depiction of the FDA announcement of the ‘approval’ of the first COVID19 vaccine. For the avoidance of any doubt, NO such authorisation has yet been issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

On August 23, 2021, the FDA appeared to have announced it had approved the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, to be marketed as Comirnaty. The announcement appeared extensively in the media and on the FDA website.

However, the announcement is misleading, probably deliberately so, and as such actionable in a court of law.

The reality is far removed from the fiction depicted in the media, known for being the spin doctors for Big Pharma’s snake oil. Despite what CNN, ABC the BBC or any other of the Rothschild-controlled organs tell you, BioNTech Comirnaty has NOT been granted FDA full approval.

Comirnaty was ONLY approved under the generic express approval rules for bio identical drugs and subject to all restrictions of the original Bio Identical “Emergency Use Authorization” (EUA) approved Vaccine it was copied from.

The ‘vaccine’ (in quote marks because this potion fails the legal definition) has not passed any approved testing protocol for safety, as is the case for all the other experimental treatments rushed out in the wake of the Sars-CoV-2 pandemic.

Readers should note the data submitted in this ‘approval process’ was the same data that Pfizer-BioNTech submitted. Nothing new, nothing changed. So why re-examine the same data?

A simple rubber-stamping procedure for fellow crony capitalists? This explains why the FDA did not examine any of the data submitted.

How Do We Know This May be Malpractice and Probably Unlawful?

The FDA may have intentionally violated their express approval rules by granting approval of BioNTech’s COMIRNATY as they were required to have packaging and labeling approved at the same time. The key is in the label to have all information of the copied drug – vaccine except what needs to be changed such as manufacturer and location of manufacture.

The legal codes for references: . . .

[SNIP]