by John O'Sullivan - June 12, 2021

As COVID19 is shown not to be an infectious and deadly viral pathogen, key flaws in the pandemic’s accepted scientific narrative are being addressed. If a virus cannot be proven to cause disease then does it exist?

According to a seemingly non-controversial statement in Wikipedia a virus is:

“… a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. Viruses infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.”

There is wide scientific consensus that a virus is neither living or dead, but is an agent that requires a living cell to replicate, and it will cause infection and disease. Indeed, the peer-reviewed medical literature affirms that a virus is often referred to as a “parasite.” [1]

But during this insane pandemic dissenting researchers have come to the fore to argue that in empirical science no such ‘deadly virus’ has been reproduced in a laboratory. Freedom of Information (FOIA) requests to governments further show that none will claim they can demonstrate in the lab that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent of infection.

For example, ‘UK’s Govt Office For Science Admits No Proof Of Isolated ‘COVID-19 Virus’’, ‘The Non-Existent Virus; And The Implications’‘Even CDC Now Admits No ‘Gold Standard’ Of COVID19 Virus Isolate’,

Last year Principia Scientific International was the world’s first independent science association to declare there was no LAB proof of COVID19. Our expert in this field, Dr Saeed Qureshi, was at the forefront of calling out the fraud.

So, is virology in a mess over this? We share with readers some of our concerns on the key issues.

Crucially, as a science association strongly supportive of empiricism and the traditional scientific method (as extolled by Karl Popper) we question why modern medicine seems to have abandoned the standard measure of proving the existence of a disease – Koch’s postulates.

To our way of thinking Koch’s postulates appears to have been abandoned during the current pandemic. Not lost on us is the worrisome lack of post mortems being performed on so called victims of COVID19.

Even at the height of the Spanish Flu epidemic of 1918 evidence gathering via pathology was key. But now pathology is being bypassed in what seems a rush to accept an unproven panacea – mass vaccination with experimental gene therapy (mRNA).

When post mortems are carried out on supposed ‘COVID19 victims’ the results prove no such cause of death, as we showed in ‘ Top Pathologist: ‘NO ONE Has Died From The Coronavirus!’

The A high-profile European pathologist, Dr. Stoian Alexov called the World Health Organization (WHO) a “criminal medical organization” for creating worldwide fear and chaos without providing objectively verifiable proof of a pandemic.

Dr. Alexov, Bulgarian Pathology Association (BPA) president added that with no hard evidence to prove the existence of any deadly virus it is “impossible” to create a vaccine against it.

Meanwhile, in the UK speaking to the Daily Record Scotland’s most eminent pathologist, Tony Busuttil, emeritus professor of forensic medicine at Edinburgh University, said . . .

[SNIP]