(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles Miller writes:
The Reason we keep sending Trump these Monographs is very simple.
No where to we see in any discussions in any media the POSITIONS OF THE PEOPLE PRESENTED FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE. We read the contracts and identified the parties, positions, obligations.
What we do see is the so called qualified experts pontificating from a position of franchised, licensed, regulated, subjects blathering about the Peopleís law and how terrible it is to suffer under the confused state at the present.
In our well informed and founded understanding, subjects or servants, voluntary or involuntary, are not Masters.
The People are the Masters in our country. Thatís what the documents creating our country Declare.
So, we decided to act from the Masters position.
The metaphor for the Masters position is perfectly defined in the following picture. Our government structure is like a pyramid. The pyramid is built on the sand. The sand is the people the foundation of all Government. The pinnacle of the pyramid is the office of the president and the governors of the states. The people are like the eagle flying over the pinnacle of the pyramid making a large deposit on the pinnacle. We all know what rolls downhill. When the deposit reaches the bottom the sand begins to shift. No one wants to be covered by government bullshit!
We also figured out if we donít do this no one else will then the real principal facts and law founding have no place in any of the public forums.
Please remember all of those people that are franchised, licensed, regulated, identified by taxpayer ID, in order to carry on their business, are taking a privilege from Government which means they are subjects.
We added at the bottom of this Monograph a Supreme Court case that defines our positions perfectly. All the readers please enjoy it.
TRUMP, CIVIL RIGHTS CORRECTIONS
Dear President Trump, our President,
Civil Action Correcting Civil Rights for All Americans.
We are late in sending due to the continuing stream of critical information providing more complete understandings of contexts in flow, dividing confusions from clarity and precision, according to the Rule of Law. First law of course being that from Creation.
Part 1 is clarified as to fundamentals for the exercise of the Peopleís powers in conjunction with our Office of President below.
Tools provided by Beneficiaries are presented from the position of the People, in full capacity and standing of OWNERS of the governments We the People created, beginning day one, 4 July 1776. The Public Trusts created by the People are perpetuities. The principles, facts, law and procedures forming the contracts between the People styled as Constitutions have not changed since day one. Nor, has the Peopleís law ruling over the governments We created changed since day one.
What this means in real simple terms is that public servants, from top to bottom, are just that servants to the People. This fact has not changed since day one.
What has changed is the perception that servants control and regulate the Master, the People. This proposition is supported by a small minority of the People. The small minority organized them selves into an attacking force, operating secretly to subvert the principles, facts and law that created their servants and franchised legal personalties ability to operate. Thus, the current confusions destroying both the Masters and servants positions continue to grow.
The growth of these confusions based on one single root issue. The Law of the Peopleís Constitutions is not recognized, is not in public dialogues. Thus the fundamental principles, facts, laws and procedures creating the light of Liberty, the Right to Choose, are clouded over by lack of understanding of then gifts of the Founders.
Simple fact is that all of the discussions revolving around the Constitution and its construction is carried out by servants or servant franchised positions, Thus, there is no place recognize for the people as the Masters to apply their law as written. Arguments between servants never serve the Master. When the Master engages in arguments with the servants the Master abandons the position and joins the servant and their confusion regarding their service obligations.
You, Mr. Trump are being provided with the understanding of one of the hidden gifts from the Founders. Reading the Contract from the position of the Founders exposes the gift that invites every American alive at the moment to express their personal private property, Political Will, in the same manner as the Founders. Accessing and applying this gift would be equal to explosion of consciousness connected to Creation represented in the Declaration of Independence.
In the context of current events the division between confusions and clarity is the Law, its principles, exercised as the fundamental control over our American adventure in Individual Liberty through the Rule of Law.
There are a few examples that expose this fundamental. A few counties required all of their citizens to be fully armed and trained in the use of Second Amendment tools. Those counties experienced no crime. The single cause for this is that every criminal that would trespass into those jurisdictions knew they would be held immediately accountable by the citizens. The fundamental principle of our whole American dream from day one in action is the example. Responsible citizens controlling our own destiny through our supervision of honest agents. When this mechanism is executed the crooks get out of Dodge.
Mr. President, the gift contained in the Constitution is the recognition in writing is that the People created one supreme Court. What this means in very simple terms is that the Peopleís court holds exclusive jurisdiction over any controversy that involves a state. The reason for this mechanism is the Founders knew the People needed the place to hold their creations, the States governments, to account out side influence from any other government operation.
What this means in very simple terms is Congress nor the Executive holds any power over or authority to alter or subvert or control that original jurisdiction. The inferior tribunals powers held by Congress cannot touch the Peopleís one supreme Court!
Article III does not identify the mechanism for appointing judges to the Peopleís one supreme Court. The Presidents duty to appoint all officers is the control factor over the Peopleís court. The provisions for Congress to create inferior tribunals bars completely the Legislative branch from having any affect whatsoever on the Peopleís court. Inferior means just that, no power to affect the Peopleís court. What this means in direct contract and procedure is that when the Office of the Forty Fifth President as a plaintiff, Rule 22 Application to Individual Justice is effectively the Presidential Appointment. The Original Jurisdiction Rule 17 requires a single judge to preside over a civil action, operated under the Civil Rules of Procedure.
There is no justice appointed to the Peopleís one supreme Court. If there were one justice appointed there would be a public record identifying the Peopleís court in the appointment and Senate confirmation records.
This point is extremely relevant in the context of the FRAUD of the 2020 election being the gravaman of the civil action contract. No transfer of Presidential powers could ever take place on acts or omissions exposing FRAUD. More to the point Donald Trump can not be released from duties of the President, because there is no constitutional mechanism to transfer or terminate the Oath pledged to serve the Office until a properly elected individual is properly sworn in.
There is no circumstance that could allow or validate denying a plaintiff, Donald Trump the man from seeking redress, remedy and relief for theft of the public office through FRAUD.
There is no constitutional, legal or political mechanism that could deny the Office of the Forty Fifth President from protecting the Peopleís Office from theft, trespass, usurpation.
Being that Donald Trump is the only duly elected President the absolute duty of both the man and Office to move as PLAINTIFFS is self evident.
Being that the limits are carried with each and every of its acts, those recognized as subjects to Congressional control through licensing, franchise, regulation, public servant position or any derivative thereto, are barred from accessing the Peopleís original jurisdiction court. Servants are never equal to the Master and are barred from exercising the Masters positions.
The fundamental legal fact to understand is there are two original jurisdictions built into our country. First is the Peopleís jurisdiction from which all authority and power of governments flows via contracts, Constitutions, between the People creating governments. Second is the well defined and specifically identified in writings the limited powers of governments. The core issue is the recognition of the superior jurisdiction. Master and servant law is well defined and time honored in every society and culture from the beginning of man kinds recorded history.
The People are the Masters.
Public servants, or franchised, licensed, regulated associations, legal person entities failing or intentionally denying the People our Right to access our law, particularly our exclusive jurisdiction over our one supreme Court, commit intentional Constitutional TORTS. The result of Constitutional TORTS are always felonies, high crimes, subject to criminal and civil statutes punishing treason, sedition, rebellion, conspiracy, obstruction of government process, theft of government money by failing to perform, and more, much more.
There is no excuse whatsoever for servants to be ignorant of their obligations when the service position is accepted by the Peopleís public servants. This is particularly true when the service obligations are given voluntarily under known terms and conditions defined by the Peopleís jurisdictions known as Constitutions. Thus, any and every public servant must choose loyalty or disloyalty to the Constitutions that We the People created birthing governments they serve. This choice is akin to the concept of Consent of the Governed.
The simple way to look at this is the People created the House known as our Republic. All public servants and franchised regulated entities are tenants in our house. The landlord, the People, always has the right to evict tenants for nonpayment which equates to lack of proper performance under the terms of service.
The CIVIL ACTION CONTRACT is simply and directly the access point for all government services. The governments created by the people are first and foremost providers of services to the People creating governments. The highest service provided is the application of LEGALIZED FORCE of the law to protect the People in our lives, properties, rights Liberties resulting in happiness. Legalized Force covers all issues concerning domestic and foreign relationships of every type or kind.
The scam sold by the legal profession, particularly the pinnacle of the trade, judges, confusing the whole of the People, is exposed by simple understanding of contract and what it takes to form a binding obligation. No brainer time is exposed by simple direct review of the facts of public record concerning purchase contract for application of legalized force, an exclusive property right of government guaranteed by Consent of the Governed. Honest elections perhaps?
The currently operating federal courts, particularly the Supreme Court created by Congress, offer mandatory services by invitation to the courts.
The invitation is the Rules of Court. These rules offer a service. The service is qualified by the rules.
The Citizen accepts the invitation. The Citizen prepares the necessary paperwork to meet the rules qualifications.
The Citizen files the required documents with the court clerk. The clerks office validates the documents as qualifying the purchase of services.
The filing fee is paid. Summons are issued under court seal. An case number identifier is assigned. This is an official government record. This record identifies a Plaintiff or Plaintiffs, Defendant or Defendants, a cause or causes of action.
Plaintiff or Plaintiffs serve the Summons. Return the sealed Summons executed as proof of service to the clerk. Defendant or Defendants are attached by the law and now subject to legalized force.
Offer, acceptance, consideration, terms of contract now perfected.
The Contract is perfected. Personal obligations are owed by the court officers and employees. These obligations are fiduciary in nature because every court officer, employee, are public servants, as are court franchised attorneys through the court UNION, the BAR members authorized for a fee to do business with the court. Citizens or Plaintiffs as injured parties are the obligees in the fiduciary relationships.
The Appointment of Fiduciary form sent prior is the personal attachment to each and every of the court operators.
The key element in the transaction purchase contract is the recognition that no public servant nor public franchised activity agent, is granted discretion when in comes to service to and application of the law of the People, nor the Rules of Court, nor the performance standards required under the purchase contract. Breach of contract by any one of these service providers then becomes a Constitutional TORT. There are no assignments in any statute recognizing discretion when it comes to application of the law, the contracts with government operations or acceptance of licensed franchised doing of business with the People.
When Mike Lindell and others are Plaintiffs and they present facts certified from public record proving election FRAUD, there is no escape from the consequences of application of the law and Rules of Court. This point is conclusive under the Full Faith and Credit clause of the Constitution.
Another no brainer moment is exposed by one simple statement. No government actor or government franchised operation can ever argue with official public records created by governments, because they would be attacking the government agency that created the records in the first place. Attacking oneís employer or another employed agent is never a valued position. In order to impeach the credibility of official public record the attacker would be required to show conclusively the public records are fatally defective in some manner. Invitation to the Socialist Democrats and their masters perhaps?
Mr. President, the People, your Beneficiaries, WISH, our President recognize the obvious duty to open the one supreme Court so that every American may express directly into the public servants world our demands for honest elections, honest public service from our well paid public servants.
The Federal Civil Rule of Procedure in a civil action contract invites every American to become a Plaintiff under Rule 19.
What happens when Trumps Army of over one hundred million people receive the invitation request from the Commander in Chief?
Please let the characters trashing our country try to fight the People in a single point focused action demanding honorable service!
When the American People are the primary Plaintiffs and the injured party Donald John Trump speaks for the people, then the Office of the 45th president moves the action into the peoples one supreme Court, all the elements of the principles founding our country are motion in every public forum world wide.
The beginning of resolution to many confusions facing the People and our country are waiting to be implemented!
Mr. President, itís the name of anything identified and defining itís authority to exist in the context of all government actions. The current Supreme Court is identified by the legislature. The one supreme Court is a separate and different entity by name alone identified in the Constitution. Different entities mean different jurisdiction. Itís that simple.
By the way Mr. President, can you or any of your advisers identify the portion of the federal Constitution or any state constitution that authorizes any government created by the people to allow contractors or corporations of any nature to rule over and regulate the people in any manner whatsoever?
Part 3 will identify the critical element of defining the capacities of the parties.
YICK WO v HOPKINS. 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are sup- [118 U.S. 356, 370] posed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration, the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion, or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the government of the commonwealth 'may be a government of laws and not of men.' For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.