Well,I just scanned the headlines in the forum,I see s*#t for brains bombed Syria...not good for us, not to mention the Syrians.I really am starting to wonder just how many are awake, and those who are merely woke. The actions I am seeing on the Internet are showing me, that there are not as many awake as I thought. The United States IS NOT a member of the United Nations,not today, not yesterday or tomorrow.It would behoove the people of the states that make up this union, to read and reread if you have to, to understand the second chapter on free trade in this post.
Come 2022, you already know what needs to be done, EVERY SINGLE SEAT needs to be changed and occupied by a person who knows who gave him the job. If I was a governor of a state right now, I would print that states 'money', give it to the people, and tell the federal reserve to f*#k off and die. I would then make it a law calling said 'money' legal tender in said state. I would also kick every federal employee out of my state and tell them we no longer need 'their kind' of services...just some random snips from this chapter on free trade...The chapter on religion was there, so I did not skip it,I commented within where I felt moved. Your thing with the Creator is your thing, I do not and will not infringe upon anyones free will. Hopefully each uses that for their own good.....and help kill this free trade lie and stop calling that scum on that pos island our allies!
....Globalism played no part in making America great. Globalism is a catchword of the Madison Avenue media brainwashers to disguise the fact that the so-called global economy touted by Wilson, Roosevelt, Bush and Clinton will eventually reduce America's living standards to that of Third World countries. Here we have a classic case where through Socialism, Americans are fighting again the American Revolution of 1776 to set the nation free of the toils of the fraud that is called NAFTA, with an even bigger fraud called GATT waiting to march onto the battlefield.
In 1992, Bush eagerly picked up the NAFTA ball and began to run with it. Canada was used as a measuring stick to see how well NAFTA would sit with the Canadian people. In this Bush was ably assisted by former prime minister Brian Mulroney. The purpose of NAFTA is to destroy the industrial and agricultural bases of both countries and thereby bring down the middle class. The Post Industrial plans of the Committee of 300 have not progressed fast enough. The situation is rather akin to that which Bertrand Russell described in his desire to kill off millions of "useless eaters." Russell's plan called for a return of the black plague to rid the world of what he called, "excess population." ....
....GATT was put together at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, held in Cuba, on March 24, 1948. The conference delegates advanced the cause of Adam Smith's "free trade" which they said, would make the world a better place for the ordinary people. While the title, GATT was to come later, the groundwork for this Socialist fraud was laid in Cuba in 1948.
When the agreement reached in Cuba was presented to the House and Senate, it was passed, for the simple reason that it was not understood. Generally, when the House and Senate do not understand a measure before them, the measure gets passed as quickly as possible. This is what happened in the case of the Federal Reserve Act, the United Nations Treaty, the Panama Canal Treaty and NAFTA.
By voting in favor of the NAFTA, the House transferred United States sovereignty to the One World Government in Geneva, Switzerland. This seditious act had a precedent. In 1948, a Republican-dominated House and Senate passed the Trade Agreement Act which arose from the United Nations meeting in Cuba. Hitherto, the Republican Party had held itself out to be the protector of American industry and American jobs, but it turned out to be as false as the Democrat position, and in favor of Adam Smith's Socialist "free trade." A great blow was struck against American industry and trade by the Fabian Socialists in Britain and their American cousins in the United States. The fact that the Trade Agreement Act was 100 percent unconstitutional, and yet it passed, was a cause of sweet satisfaction for the Fabian Society.
By 1962, President John F. Kennedy was calling the sell-out of the American people, "a wholly new approach, a bold new instrument of American trade policy." In his fatally-flawed assessment of where the Fabian Socialists were taking the American people, Kennedy had been fully supported by labor leader George Meaney at the AFL — CIO convention in Florida earlier that year. Congress dutifully passed the legislation, seemingly oblivious of its unconstitutionality.....
....Let us then examine the Constitution and see what it has to say on this vital issue: Article VI, Section 2 "...This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or shall be made, under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land..." The words, "This Constitution and the laws of the United States", says that a treaty is only a law. Law of the Land" relates to the Magna Carta, "and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or the laws of any State to the contrary no withstanding."
The word "supreme" in part 2 is NOT "supreme" but ordinary law. To grasp this fully, one has to know the United States Constitution and the historical background that goes with it, which can be found only in the Annals of Congress, the Congressional Globes and the Congressional Records. A full and proper studies of these documents is a prerequisite for understanding what a treaty is. Unfortunately, our legislators never bother to educate themselves through a study of these marvelous journals. Law professors know still less about these mines of information, and therefore, frequently teach constitutional law that is very wide of the mark. It is a case of the blind leading the blind.
"Supreme" was inserted to ensure that French, British and Spanish governments could not backtrack on agreements made over territories ceded to the United States. It was a sufficient way to prevent future governments of these countries on reneging on agreements, but, unfortunately, also caused many Americans to understand that a treaty is "supreme" law. It is impossible for a treaty to be "supreme" when it is only in pursuance thereof. "Can the offspring be greater than the parent? The United States Constitution is always SUPREME at all times and in all circumstances. Laws can never be "supreme" as they are alterable and may have been wrongly passed. The child cannot be greater than the parent.
In spite of what Justice Ruth Ginsberg said about the constitution being flexible, the United States Constitution is not flexible, it is IMMUTABLE. We know that the First rule of any treaty is self preservation. We also know now, that in the United States ALL TREATIES WITHOUT EXCEPTION ARE ORDINARY LAWS AND CAN BE REPEALED AT ANYTIME. A treaty, any treaty, that seriously harms the United States violates the rule of self preservation and can be revoked, even if only by cutting off money to fund it. That is why treaties like the U.N., NAFTA, GATT, ABM, Panama Canal Treaty, are NULL AND VOID, and ought to be revoked by Congress; indeed, would be revoked, if Congress was not dominated by Socialists.
more ugliness here