By Anna Von Reitz
don't have to go over all this again and again and again?
actual law pertaining to Americans --- as opposed to the Municipal Code which
some people are mistaking for our Public Law --- which does describe "firearms",
and the Territorial Federal Code, which also describes "firearms" in a slightly
keep and bear arms. Our law doesn't say anything about "firearms" at all.
unabridged right to have, keep, bear, and use any kind of armament at all.
Rifles, Howitzers, Sling slots, tanks, airplanes, rockets, knives, nail guns,
self-propelled grenades, bombs, Molotov cocktails, drones, bb guns, machine
guns, throwing axes, whatever. Period.
law with respect to Americans, defines "firearms". The Territorial Federal Code,
which is foreign law with respect to Americans, also defines "firearms".
and red-herring that has its roots in the post-Civil War Era when the Capitol
City was afraid that US Army Units would use "artillery and small firearms" to
stage a take-over. This was later amended in 1933 --- after the glory days of Al
Capone --- to "firearms" in the vein of rifles and tommy guns and sawed-off
shotguns used by gangsters, and none of it pertains to us at all.
purely "Federal" law that pertains solely to the administration of the
Municipality of Washington, DC. Last time I looked, it is about 2800 pages long
including definitions and addendums, and costs about $1800 per copy, with the
result that most Americans have never even seen a copy of the Municipal Code.
was originally intended to prevent artillery and cannons from being brought into
Washington, DC, and didn't impact our right to keep and bear "arms" outside the
city limits--- a separate topic --- at all. That is why the Municipal Code was
allowed to stand, and the reason it still stands.
their own citizenry and to control their own premises, but they can in no way
pass legislation affecting our rights on our turf.
him it was a mistake, to try to go into their set-apart little enclave and claim
his "guarantees" as an American--- doing that makes as much sense as going to
Ireland, violating Irish law, and then claiming it doesn't apply to you because
you are an American.
your law applies. If you are an American in Ireland, their law applies. Rod
Class was an American in the Municipality of Washington, DC, which is an
independent international city-state. Their law applied and their law defines
being confused about the nature of their Federal Subcontractors and also being
confused about where and when their constitutional guarantees apply.
anywhere on Earth, I trust that you know that you can't swagger in with a
weapon? And if you do, you may be mistaken for an enemy combatant? That's an
example of Territorial Codes applying within the perimeter of arsenals and is
also a foreign law, simply a better-known foreign law generally called "Federal
grown to more than fifty separate sections called "Titles" covering different
topics and it does discuss "firearms" particularly in Title 27 which covers the
BATF and the nuts and bolts administration of the regulatory power that the
Federal Subcontractors were granted by The Constitution of the United States of
America to "regulate" the "interstate" sale, transport, and manufacture of
tobacco, alcohol, and firearms--- as a source of revenue to support the Federal
with firing pans, what we would call "black powder" guns. The Federal Government
was supposed to eke its earnings out of whatever it could raise as revenue from
the interstate manufacture, sale, or transport (across state lines) of such
firearms. They have more or less sensibly extrapolated that right to regulate
"firearms" to include modern small arms and profited themselves from licensing
them-- not their owners.
that never finds reference to Americans standing on their own turf. The
definition of "firearms" only appears -- in either Municipal or Territorial
terms -- in foreign law and with respect to foreign jurisdictions.
a foreign, independent, international city state operating in the global
jurisdiction of the Air. The Territorial Government is a separate, foreign,
British Commonwealth entity operating in the international jurisdiction of the
foreign law. And neither one can dictate jack diddly squat to an American
standing on the land and soil of his own State of the Union, or exercising any
"reserved right" not explicitly addressed by their respective Constitutions----
so long as he is "standing in his own right" and operating on his own turf.
as I have pointed out with monotonous regularity, is a separate international
city-state, completely independent of the rest of this country, ruled over by
the members of "the" United States (Municipal) Congress, acting as a plenary
oligarchy, and it is set apart and allowed to function in this manner by Article
1, Section 8, Clause 17.
us, Americans---and it never has. It was set up this way on purpose, both to
invite foreign investment to bear the cost of building it, and to provide a
meeting place where members of all fifty States could gather on neutral ground.
applies to all corporations formed in Washington, DC, which is the only reason
that this topic bears much discussion at all, with respect to "firearms" or
bringing "firearms" -- according to their Municipal Code definition -- into
their foreign enclave, and thinking that their law didn't apply on their turf.
He apparently thought that his Constitutional Guarantees were owed to him
everywhere on Earth, but a little thought will prove that this is not true, nor
is it reasonable to assume.
and bear arms on the Island of Bali? Don't you grant that the Balinese would
have something to say about that? And if they didn't want you to have a .357
tucked under your arm during your vacation stay, for fear you might use it
against their people, wouldn't they as a foreign government have a right to
impound your weapon?
border guards and customs agents in spite of their efforts to clearly post and
give notice of their restrictions, wouldn't they have a right to charge you with
such crimes as willful criminal mischief, even if you left your gun locked up in
a gun case the whole time?
same with Washington, DC.
book at Rod Class and they had every right to. I warned him before he did it and
told him why, but he was a bonehead and he went shashaying into Washington, DC,
with a couple deer rifles and God-knows-what in his truck.
though I love him dearly, he's still a bonehead and hasn't learned any of the
lessons I have tried to teach him -- complete with evidentiary proof. How hard
is it, after all, to read Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 when someone points it
out to you, and take in the meaning of "plenary oligarchy"?
learn to drive on their own side of the road, a lot of good men are going to be
needlessly hurt and a great deal of brain power and effort is going to be
needs to know, for certain, that the "Federal Government" is being run by
foreign Subcontractors and when I say "foreign" I mean foreign in the same sense
that Spain is foreign to Denmark.
called "Codes and Statutes and Regulations" and they operate in foreign
international and global jurisdictions that most Americans have no reason to
visit, except perhaps as tourists.
to regulate and profit from the interstate manufacture, sale or transport of
"firearms" and so, they will, within reason, update the meaning of "firearms"
into the modern world, and they will regulate away with gusto every time there
is manufacture, sale, or transport of small arms across state borders.
regulated goods, and they can also license their own citizenry with or without
that specific regulatory authority, but it is severely doubtful that their
regulatory authority extends to licensing Americans when those Americans are
standing on their own soil.
Federal regulatory authority to license Americans to do anything at all, and I
do mean anything, on their own turf ---has never been breached in the Supreme
Court of the United States---- but it certainly should be, because the Federales
of both stripes have been trespassing against us and usurping against our people
by registering and licensing activities of common right without authority to do
Washington, DC, to ban firearms within their own city boundaries, is not a
worthy topic to even debate. The right of the Territorial Government to regulate
"interstate" manufacture, sale, and transport of alcohol, tobacco, and
"firearms" is another don't-bother-me-with-it topic. Read your Constitutions and
you can see for yourselves exactly what they are allowed and not allowed.
are clearly allowed to do, and stomp on them if they cross the line and
trespass. It really is as simple and as difficult as that.
with a plenary oligarchy on our Eastern Seaboard, and until we get angry enough
with their shenanigans to boot them into the sea and reclaim the ground under
the city --- which still belongs to Maryland and Virginia, by the way --- that's
regulate and profit from the interstate sale, manufacture or transport of
exactly three commodities. If they try to extend their paws to include other
commodities or include activities taking place in "non-interstate" environments,
like your backyard, tell them where to get off and do it in no uncertain terms.
that you are an American, and not any species of Municipal or Territorial
"person" at all.