Source:
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index3431.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

December 25, 2020

Supreme Court Appears Ready To Deal Shocking Death Blow To Biden

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

A gobsmacking new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today discussing events relating to Day 52 of the election war currently raging in America, says first to notice was leftist cable news outlet CNN celebrating the 80^th birthday of Dr. Anthony Fauci on Christmas Eve—a celebration that saw CNN newsman Austen Bundy proclaiming: “Today we celebrate the birth of our 2020 Lord and Savior”, and when noticing yesterday, saw Security Council Members likening this demonic worship to the Russian communists replacement of Christianity with “Heroes of the Soviet Union”—communist state heroes Dr. Fauci is a carbon copy of, as while being worshipped like a “god” by his socialist-leftist followers, he then admitted that he has been deliberately lying about the coronavirus because the American people “were not ready to hear the truth”—and was a deliberate lie from this “state hero” CNN didn’t bother to even report on, as they then spent their time urging for a constitutional amendment to prevent President Donald Trump or anyone like him from having power again.

Though most critical to notice, was all of this leftist insanity occurring in the shadows of the United States Supreme Court appearing to be readying itself to launch an all-out attack on the Constitution of the United States of America in order to deal a death blow to Communist Chinese puppet socialist Democrat Party leader Joe Biden and keep President Trump in power—the evidence of which began to emerge on 23 December, which was when the White House staff was ordered to stop packing to leave and told: “Updated information will be shared in the coming days”—an order that countermanded the previous one given on 22 December telling them to begin packing, thus causing Security Council Members to question what had happened during this 24-hour period to cause this sudden change—the answer to which came into focus when noticing that during the late evening of 22 December, the Supreme Court released its previous day’s order in the case Donald J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.—a case against this corrupted and fraudulent election the Supreme Court is expected to join with similar lawsuits against other States—and most important to notice about this order was the Supreme Court telling Pennsylvania to give their answer by 22 January—a seemingly perplexing order as 20 January is the date of the swearing in of the next president—but becomes more clear when noticing that following this order it saw President Trump posting video messages to the American people and directly stating: “The President and all of America know that Joe Biden manufactured at least 20 million votes to steal this year’s election…He did so with the help of China”.

Mysterious events strongly suggesting that President Trump and the Supreme Court are operating on a level far beyond superficial leftist media analysis—and one would expect when noticing that Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett are all members of the powerful legal organization known as the Federalist Society—which is an organization of conservatives and libertarians that advocates for a textualist and originalist interpretation of the United States Constitution.

Not known to the masses of the American people, though most certainly known to all Federalist Society members, is that the Constitution of the United States of America was entirely constructed from its founding documents known as the Federalist Papers—and based on Federalist No. 2 Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence—Federalist No. 3 The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence—Federalist No. 4 The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence—and—Federalist No. 5 The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence, the greatest fear of the American Founding Fathers was their nation being corrupted by either foreign force or influence—a fear that extended to foreign powers being able to influence the election of a president, and in Federalist No. 68 The Mode of Electing the President saw Founding Father Alexander Hamilton issuing the questioning statement: “Nothing was more to be desired than that every practicable obstacle should be opposed to cabal, intrigue, and corruption…These most deadly adversaries of republican government might naturally have been expected to make their approaches from more than one quarter, but chiefly from the desire in foreign powers to gain an improper ascendant in our councils…How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?”.

What the American Founding Fathers most feared became a reality when President Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected in 1932—an election during the Great Depression that saw American globalist elites siding with the ascendant National Socialist German Workers' Party (aka Nazi Party), as they feared Roosevelt would enact policies favorable to the citizens of America that would cut into their profits—that caused these American globalist elites and Nazis to plot to steal the election from Roosevelt, and is why history now records that “during the tense months between Franklin Roosevelt’s election in November and his inauguration in March 1933, democracy hung in the balance”.

And exactly why democracy “hung in the balance” was because these Deep State operatives forced through the US Congress what history now records as the “Lame Duck Amendment”, that was passed by the US Congress on 2 March 1932, and ratified on 3 January 1933—is otherwise known as the 20^th Amendment—and cut the time between when a president was elected to when they were sworn in to barely two months—a strategic move intended to not allow President Roosevelt enough time to go through the courts to contest a stolen election—but to fight back against saw Roosevelt garnering enough support to make him exempt from this amendment, and on 4 March 1933, saw him being sworn in as president—that was followed by a coup being launched against him.

Of the many American legal scholars who’ve known for decades that the true purpose of the 20^th Amendment was designed to prevent a president from having enough time to contest an election influenced by foreign powers, one of the most noteworthy is Professor R. George Wright at the law department at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis—a prodigious legal scholar whose writing, such as this year’s “The Projected Light Message Cases: A Study In The General Erosion Of Free Speech Theory”, have for decades been citied in some of the most important rulings handed down by the Supreme Court—is further notable because of his being an Indianapolis neighbor and mentor to Justice Amy Coney Barrett—though most critical to know about is his being the author of the legal scholar article “Could A Constitutional Amendment Be Unconstitutional?”, wherein he argues: “If a constitutional amendment leaves a constitution in such a state that it is a “smoldering, meaningless wreckage” and extremely internally inconsistent and incoherent, then such an amendment should indeed be declared unconstitutional”.

An argument that more than applies to the “smoldering, meaningless wreckage” of this Communist Chinese influenced American election whose “extremely internally inconsistent and incoherent” constraints placed on President Trump by the 20^th Amendment so he can’t contest it through the courts are as absurd as they are dangerous—a reality seemingly noticed by the Supreme Court, and explains their 22 January order for two days after the inauguration—a 20 January inauguration date able to be challenged by President Trump, and if filed and granted by the Supreme Court to be heard would make this date meaningless, and restore it to its original date of 4 March. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]

United States Supreme Court starts issuing orders (above) on election cases during week of Christmas.

December 25, 2020 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~