(Thanks, C. :)
Reader Charles: "TRUMP, THE PLAN OR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE"
hobie -- Saturday, 12-Dec-2020 19:51:33
Reader Charles Miller writes:
Please Publish the Attached below duly served to the White House, President Trump continuation of Advisory fro Beneficiaries.
Sent 5:40 pm, pacific, 1213/2020
Declaratory Judgements coming next.
- - -
TRUMP, THE PLAN OR CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE, PART 2
Dear President Trump, our President,
The Plan or Criminal Negligence, Part 2.
1 of 7
Beneficiaries, Miller and Provost Jr, in accord with our promise yesterday, present the basics of a Civil Action Complaint for our President, executing full Presidential powers and authorities to the Judicial branch calling Constitutional duties due and owed by the Supreme Court to account.
PLEASE UNDERSTAND MR. PRESIDENT, THAT WHEN YOU ACT, EXECUTE YOUR DUTY TO ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION, PROPERLY, IN A CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT UNDER RULE 17, EVERY STATE HOLDS THE RIGHT TO ACCESS CIVIL RULE 19 JOINDER OF NECESSARY PARTY, EXECUTING THEIR OWN CONTRACT RIGHTS, OR RULE 24 INTERVENTION.
This Sir, is true leadership of a Statesman!
Mr. President, responses or reactions are always different when the approach is from the position of asking or from demand that the law be executed as written. The roles reverse when the law speaks. One position requires contracted performance. The other invites discretion. No public servant is granted discretion when it comes to the law being enforced as written.
Mr. President, a Civil Action Complaint structured as below, will open the door to clarifying many legal relationships between the People and our governments, our public servants, the President and government entities, particularly the States and the Judicial branch.
The law is specific not general. The more specific We are leaves much less room for constructions influenced by political, commercial or social leanings. Assumptions are valuable only when the proof of fact and law are not present.
Hiding behind procedure always fails when the proper procedure is applied with the rules, law and the facts incorporated properly. Then the procedure traps those hiding in their own world.
The People as the Sovereigns elected Donald John Trump as our spokesman, President, to the other two branches of the federal government and the States. The Supreme Court defined these legal relationships. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886). “ When we consider the nature and the theory of our institutions of government, the principles upon which they are supposed to rest, and review the history of their development, we are constrained to conclude that they do not mean to leave room for the play and action of purely personal and arbitrary power. Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts. And the law is the definition and limitation of power. It is, indeed, quite true that there must always be lodged somewhere, and in some person or body, the authority of final decision; and in many cases of mere administration, the responsibility is purely political, no appeal lying except to the ultimate tribunal of the public judgment, exercised either in the pressure of opinion, or by means of the suffrage. But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, so that, in the famous language of the Massachusetts bill of rights, the government of the commonwealth 'may be a government of laws and not of men.' For the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, or any material right essential to the enjoyment of life, at the mere will of another, seems to be intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself.”
Right to life and material right essential to the enjoyment of life is expressed by the People’s most sacred property, the Vote.
President Trump holds the Sovereignty of the People who elected him, the vote, in 2016. This Trust represents the political body of the People when it comes to enforcing the People’s law of our Constitution and its controlling Bill of Rights. In current confused circumstances, the Equal Protection mandate of the Fourteenth Amendment, bringing the Fourth, Fifth, particularly the Ninth Amendment to bare, is the hammer of the People upon DIVIDED LOYALTY public servants attempting to steal our country through election fraud.
There are no word counts or other limiting rules or bars concerning a Civil Action Complaint that could limit telling the whole story.
No. ________________ Original Jurisdiction.
In the Supreme Court of the United States
Complaint for Breach of Contract, Civil Rights Violations; Rule 17 Original Jurisdiction.
The People of the United States of America; ex rel, Donald John Trump in official capacity of the President of the United States of America, and Chief Law Enforcement Officer for the United States Government.
The State of _________
Attorney General name,
Secretary of State name;
in official capacity.
( name of each individual ) are sued in their personal, individual capacities.
( list states of Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Virginia …… )
This Civil Action contract is with this court, for, Complaint by the People of the States United, presented by the President of the United States executing high duties to enforce the People’s Constitution, arises under the Constitution as Amended; Article VI, Article II, Article I; Amendments XIV, IX, V, IV; federal Statues found by reference to United States Code, Title 42, § 1986, § 1985, § 1983 procedure; as more fully appears hereinafter;
Right to Jury Trial Reserved, Amendment VII, Article III.
Venue is the Seat of Government, Washington City, District of Columbia.
The People of the States United in perpetual Union as creators of the States, by Constitution and by Preamble creators of the Constitution for the United States of America, in fact and law the creators are holders and holders in due course, owners, of obligations of defendants, Article VI sections 2 and 3.
The People as plaintiffs individually own their vote as private property, the expression of political will, transferring Consent to be governed to defendants.
The vote property expressed in official ballot, is in the care and custody of defendants which are required to be held secure. Executed ballots are private property of the voter, plaintiffs herein.
The People assigned the duty to the Office of President to act as representative for the People, plaintiffs herein and herewith, holding full powers to execute the People’s Constitution and proper statutes pursuant to election in 2016.
Donald John Trump, is the President of the United States of America, Chief Law Enforcement Officer of the United States Government.
The first law to be enforced is the United States Constitution.
The President is bound by law of the Constitution, Article II, to represent the source and authority for all government, the People’s, right to elections free from fraud or the appearance of fraud.
The Office of President of the States United on behalf of the People, the source and authority for all government, invokes the original judicial power of one supreme Court identified by Constitution, before this Court, and now calls due the obligations of this Court, to provide relief and remedy for Breach of Contract, Civil Rights Violations, by defendant States, affecting every Citizen voter country wide in every State.
The State of ( list ever sate individually ) ; are creations of the People, plaintiffs herein, via constitutions, constructing governments serving the exclusive Beneficiaries of all government operations, the People in the States, by providing honest government services, particularly elections and honest ballot counts.
Defendant Governors, Attorney Generals, and Secretary of State, offices, are properties of the State, with known and well defined duties identified by Constitution and proper exercise of Legislative authorities controlling all State government operations.
Defendant States and their offices are immune from suit or prosecution because as repositories for the Peoples Sovereignty, the sovereign can not sue its self or its own property.
Defendant States are party to the United States Constitution, Article VII, thus subject to and beneficiaries to the Original Jurisdiction Civil Action Complaint, identified at Article II.
Defendant are sued in order to invoke the contract terms requiring Original Jurisdiction applying the judicial powers granted to the United States by the People.
Individual defendants are sued in their personal capacities.
All individually named defendants are public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing all Citizens, particularly plaintiffs herein and herewith are Beneficiaries, Grantors to and of the source and authority, to and for all governmental powers and operations.
All individually named defendant a public servants of higher knowledge and duties, professionals, knowing that breach of public trust is a crime requiring resignation, impeachment, when shown on public records.
Each individually named defendant claims to be an honest public servant holding various positions in the defendant State government structure, serving defendant State.
Each individually identified defendant, accepted the position of public servant, accepted consideration for services, assumed public office knowing all duties required by law.
End Part 1. Part 1A sent soon.