Thanks to reader Beli for the article!!
The 328-page draft of the new rule is proposed to amend existing DHS regulations “concerning the use and collection of biometrics in the enforcement and administration of immigration laws by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).”
Here are a few highlights from the National Law Review regarding the forthcoming rule:
Unless waived by DHS, any applicant, petitioner, sponsor, beneficiary, or individual filing or associated with an immigration benefit or request, including U.S. citizens, must appear for biometrics collection – regardless of age.
There will be new biometrics modalities, including iris scans, palm prints, and voiceprints.
DHS may require DNA results to prove the existence of a claimed genetic relationship.
Foreign nationals who are granted immigration benefits will be subject to continued and subsequent vetting and biometric evaluation until granted U.S. citizenship.
New forms will be produced, including the new biometrics requirements.
The US Constitution – Amendment 5 provides: “nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”
Who owns your face? Your Eyes? Your Hands? Your vocal Cords? Your DNA? Your Body? Do you own yourself? Or does the government own your physical human body as chattel? Did your parent(s) unknowingly surrender you to the government, as a baby, with the application for birth certificate title? (yes….)
According to this proposed rule change, The Department of Homeland Security owns your face, eyes, hands, vocal cords, DNA, and your body. Clearly, If your body was your private property, then the proposed rule change by DHS is unconstitutional as the DHS does not provide just compensation for public use of our private property body.
So the only way that DHS can propose a rule like this is if they DON’T need to pay us just compensation for public use of our private property body. Thus, It is implicit in the DHS proposed rule change that government owns your face, eyes, hands, vocal cords, DNA, and body if they publicly use it without just compensation.
It is already known that the LEGAL PRESENCE is an ARTIFICIAL PERSON that represents us, like in a monopoly game of government with the legal presence being your game piece. Without a legal presence, you aren’t legally/fictionally “contained”/”located” within the legal fiction/game called “government”. It is this legal presence, created by a Birth Certificate, that gives the UN and global governments authority to use our body as surety for their legal presence/artificial person. As such, Through the legal presence, statutes are imposed… but the legal presence/statutory person does not have a face, hands, eyes, vocal cords, DNA, or a body. The human being is MADE the manifestation OF the legal presence despite the legal presence being a separate legal entity from the human being. Attorneys are literally paid to unlawfully conflate the state owned and operated legal presence artificial person as if it was the human being. In our ignorance of this, we allow the state to “own” our own human body by “complying” with the enslavement. We allow their “power over others/power over us” by capitulating to it. (One solution is “power within.” Realizing ourselves as our own creation and not a creation of government).
Through the legal presence, the government unlawfully and -through illegitimate illegal adhesion contracts- claim our face, eyes, hands, vocal cords, DNA, and body since birth.
The Government, by their system, does not need to abide by the US Constitution to provide just compensation for the public use of our private property face, eyes, hands, vocal cords, DNA, and body, especially if they already own our physical human body through conveyance of the legal presence “vessel” birth certificate.
Mandatory Vaccines are also directly related to this issue. If the government owns our physical human body through a birth certificate, they CAN mandate mandatory vaccines. However, if we own ourselves, then the government CANNOT mandate vaccines. Besides, Roe vs. Wade has something to say about bodily rights/property. Roe vs. Wade is legal precedence that people make their own decisions about our own body. According to Roe Vs. Wade, Vaccines cannot be made mandatory. Neither can state imposed psychiatry and psychiatric drugs be enforced.. yet they do that too. That we even let the US Supreme Court “decide” for us rights over our own body is an abomination of the sovereign beings we are. Such decisions are evidence that the governments think they have the authority to dictate such things, and thus that they ultimately “do control/own” us.
(Even when all domestic legal presences are relinquished, the state still acts unlawfully to continue imposing a relinquished domestic legal presence. The expatriation/relinquishment is final by their own legal precedence, meaning expatriation/relinquishment cannot be reversed by a judge. By my personal experience, a Michigan judge -in my instance- has attempted to reverse the expatriation that was final and acts on the reversal as if the relinquishment never happened. The US and State Court systems really are that corrupt. Judges appear to do ANYTHING and EVERYTHING to -partially- impose a legal presence no matter what, even AFFIDAVITS documenting lack of legal presence are ignored.)
The point of this article is to document that we need to: first know that we own ourselves as private property foreign to the governments, second that government is making a claim to own our private property human body, and third that we cannot let the government continue making such unlawful claims of slavery.
We MUST make a stand against this criminal and corrupt United States/United Nations government raping humanity of our rights through States of Emergency/WAR States/unconstitutional “powers.” We MUST make a stand that we own ourselves and have not posted our human body as surety for state “things”/legal presences. We have NOT volunteered ourselves to be state controlled farm chattel. We have NOT been informed of this control slavery system of government and now that we are informed, we revoke the United States (and 50 States) authority to operate as a human slavery system, effective immediately.
This author contacted the General Counsel for the Department of Homeland Security to ask about the Constitutionality of the proposed biometric rule change, but got no response -as yet-. I recommend that if you take your private property rights over your body seriously, that you call out the DHS for their abridgment of just compensation of the public use of our private natural property body/DNA/face/etc.
These DHS legal criminals (for their constitutional crimes and crimes against humanity) must be called out. Please spread this article as far and wide as possible. OUR Right to OUR own bodies is literally at stake here.
You can contact the Office of General Counsel of DHS yourself through email at firstname.lastname@example.org or by phone at 202-282-9822