Politicians/legislators should be held accountable for the consequences of the laws they create and/or allow to continue.

They should be held accountable for the frivilous lawsuits they provoke.

They should be held accountable for their campaign promises. Failure to follow through should have severe consequences.

They should be held accountable for all manner of abuse of power. All rackets, extortion, constructive fraud, lies, perceptual manipulations, market manipulations, kickbacks, bribes, blackmail, etc..

Since politicians/legislators have an amplifying affect, in regards to the destruction they cause, the penalties should be severe. I'm suggesting a penalty like execution.

Mistakes by government employees should be more severe than the penalties applied to the private sector. It is common for government personel to get a slap on the wrist, while the private sector gets severe punishments. This must be reversed.

Those penalties should be handed out and executed by the members of the population.

The population should not be so tolerant of politician/legislator behavior. Any politician/legislator making statements that indicate a failure to grasp the principles for the founding of the government, and its basic intent, should be removed and suffer punishment for any damages set in motion from their behavior thus far. All politicians/legislators in office at the time of the failure of one politician/legislator should be removed, and suffer the same punishment. This should promote coherence of purpose. They will police themselves.

Legislation set in motion, especially that designed with the color-of-law, crafted to confuse the less adept at legalese, and therefore mislead the population and law enforcement into compliance, especially by threat of fine, force, incarceration, or death, should be honored with a broadly publicized execution. And there should be a clear long drawn out explanation of exactly what has led up to the motivation for the execution. It is an opportunity to educate would-be politicians/legislators, and should be taken advantage of to the fullest extent. Judges are known for making an example of private sector violators of laws, and the opposite should likewise take form in a more extravagant manner.

The corporate charters for the mainstream press should be removed when they fail to call out politicians/legislators who spew unconstitutional shit, when government statements are found to be lies, when the press colludes with government directly or indirectly, when the press participates in social engineering, perceptual manipulations, or fails to speak the truth due to fear of financial losses related to an advertiser. They should also be required during elections to have in depth educational coverage on the basic principles that government is founded on.

Executions for those that have failed during their political/legislative career, should be held during the breaks of election debates, instead of commercials.

~~~

Sanders: Gun manufacturers should be held responsible when criminals use guns they made

https://www.thedailysheeple.com/sanders-gun-manufacturers-should-be-held-responsible-when-criminals-use-guns-they-made/

By

greg | Law Enforcement Today
Published on March 1, 2020

Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders supports the idea that gun manufacturers should be held liable for suit in the event there’s a crime committed with one of their firearms lawfully sold.

He did so by withdrawing his support of the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, commonly abbreviated as PLCAA.

After Sanders delivered a monologue on how he’d approach gun reform, citing things like assault weapons bans and universal background checks, Chris Cuomo asked him about his previous support for the PLCAA.

Sanders responded during the town hall the following:

“In terms of the manufacturer’s liability, I am now on the bill that takes away that exemption.”

However, the PLCAA is one of the most common-sense forms of liability protection to come around when it pertains to licensed dealers and gun manufacturers.

It’s not some protection that prevents a manufacturer or dealer from being sued if they sold a defective product that caused harm through the defect.

It’s instead a protection from when people do stupid or unlawful things with properly sold and manufactured guns.

Prior to former-President Bush signing the legislation in October of 2005, gun manufacturers were constantly having to fight lawsuits for people committing felonies with their guns.

After enough of the lawsuits and court battles had been tolerated by the industry, steps were taken to get a protection on the books.

Victims of gun violence holding gun manufacturers and dealers liable makes no sense, unless there was some kind of illegal action taken by either or entity (such as, perhaps a licensed dealer selling weapons to someone with known mental-health issues).

If the PLCAA gets abolished, then by that logic people could sue Cuisinart if they get stabbed by one of their manufactured kitchen knives?

Better yet, why not sue Home Depot if they sell a hammer to someone who then attacks someone with it? Or sue the maker of the hammer?

No person or entity should bear responsibility for the unforeseeable actions of others who use their products, no matter what those products are. The idea cheapens the objective fact of personal accountability, and treats culpability like a game of hot-potato. It’s a dangerous idea to consider.

And Sanders isn’t the only one making that push this week. So did Joe Biden.

In a speech on Monday, Biden threatened gun manufacturers, saying:

“I’m coming for you, and I’m taking you down.”

When crazy Joe is cast as a “moderate,” it must mean the rest of the Democratic field is way left…which is true. Still, Biden had tried to paint himself as something of a moderate on the issue of gun control.

His campaign’s gun control plan, which was released in October, proposed reinstating the so-called “assault-weapons ban” and universal background checks.

The campaign drew the line at forcing current owners of semi-automatic rifles to turn their guns over to the government, as some of the more loony left candidates have proposed.

Biden has tried to avoid being aggressive in his gun control rhetoric, however has repeatedly called for gun manufacturers to maintain liability when the weapons they produce is used in the commission of a crime. You know, like car manufacturers are liable when their products are used by drunk drivers—oh, never mind.

“A guy has 12 assault weapons with bump stocks, which means you can fire it faster. You can pull the trigger faster,” Biden said last week during a CNN town hall, in reference to the Las Vegas terrorist shooting.

“Why in God’s name should anyone, anyone, anyone, anyone (that’s Biden, not the writer) be able to own that? It’s just wrong, and we’ve got to—and I promise you as president, I am going to get these guys.”

Biden has ramped up the criticism of Bernie Sanders as he has somehow risen in the polls, in particular Crazy Bernie’s early career record on gun control.

Biden pointed out that Sanders was endorsed by the NRA in his 1990 congressional race, and he voted against gun control legislation a number of times when he was a young House member.

“It’s just flat out immoral, it’s just flat out immoral,” Biden said at a meeting last week with the Bloomberg-funded anti-gun group Moms Demand Action.

“You know, committed Republicans—and some Democrats—like Bernie Sanders—voted five times, five times against background checks and waiting periods; notwithstanding the fact that millions of people were denied having access to weapons of destruction because they didn’t qualify.”

Twice, once in 1991 and again in 1993, Sanders voted against a version of the Brady Bill that would have enacted mandatory waiting period for background checks.

He also voted for a bill in 2003 and 2005 that protects gun companies from lawsuits if their weapons are used in the commission of a crime.

However, since 2016, Sanders has expressed a need to expand background checks and ban assault weapons.

Biden continued his tirade against gun manufacturers:

“You know, any one of you and the people behind me should be able to walk into a court of law and demand that gun manufacturers with their enormous profits be held accountable for the carnage that they’re responsible for inflicting on our society.”

Biden’s campaign also released a web video of Sanders telling a radio caller after the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting that allowing people to sue gun manufacturers would do no good.

“Imagine if I stood up here and said…I’m going to vote to give immunity to tobacco companies, to drug manufacturers who poured nine billion opioids on the market,” Biden continued.

Biden also reiterated his record of opposing the National Rifle Association.

“I want to let them know. I promise you. I’m the only guy that has beaten the gun manufacturers—I’m the only guy that has beaten the NRA nationally, and I did it twice, nationally. And gun manufacturers, I’m coming for you. Period.”

Biden also took to social media to attack Sanders’ record on guns, suggesting that Crazy Bernie is partially responsible for the power gun manufacturers currently have.

Biden also noted that if elected (chances slim and none), on his first day in office he would send a bill to Congress repealing the liability protection for gun manufacturers, closing background check loopholes and enacting a waiting period.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple