Is the Illusion Deeper than We Think?
by "Amino" (henrymakow.com)
Aug 16, 2019

I agree that the Epstein saga is about undermining the public's trust in government/authority and cognitive dissonance is the natural reaction most people will experience from this specific case. It, therefore, implies intention and design by those who work in the shadows. Busily concocting new psyop abstractions to seed tomorrow's news is their M.O. and the likes of Tavistock et al have become so adept at it that even those who have spent years sleuthing for truth are now left with multiple and equally plausible explanations for these 'events'.

9/11 is a great example of numerous theories but no defined consensus. With no concrete lead or solid direction of inquiry, the average researcher is left with the cerebral version of the shell game. People can only endure so much of this mental fatigue before frustration and impatience start to cloud objective thought.

With this said, I think the 'Illusionists' have taken these 'stories' even further than most have considered. Let's not forget that the 'Fake News' trope was deployed just after Trump was elected. In fact, I think his inauguration marked a new chapter in the development of information warfare and psyops.

Now if we consider the myriad false-flag terror attacks that have occurred since 9/11, we can infer that some of them, perhaps even most of them have been hoaxes whereby no one has actually died. Those that come to mind are Sandyhook, Boston, Orlando, Las Vegas, Parkland, Westminster Bridge, New Zealand, etc but there are many more.

All of these had an element of the absurd about them, poor evidence suggesting actual fatalities, numerous inconsistencies, crisis actor behavior and ALL reinforcing various agendas. Is it feasible that these false flags can be conducted without the necessity for real casualties (and messy aftermath - both literally and legally)? If they are rigorously planned, choreographed and staffed by military professionals/Sayanim/hardline communist types who sign NDA's?

Are they scheduled in consultation with the authorities and the establishment media networks who bring the 'breaking news' - could this be enough to sell the illusion of authenticity? Without a platform to compete with the mainstream media, how can any shrewd analyst propagate truth to the billions of obsequious normies who only believe what the news tells them?

KABBALAH

Saying is believing' is the way of Kabbalah.

Now I'm aware that this could be interpreted as paranoid but is Epstein (the personality we're presented with by the MSM) even real? Of course, he is an actual person and he clearly rubbed/rubs shoulders with the Cabalists but how can we be sure that what we're told about his (and for that matter, all the other suspects) insidious behavior and past to be true?

Are these stories based on real events, places and victims or is it carefully constructed narrative to deploy a form of mass trauma-based mind control that leaves the recipient in an increasing state of desensitization and apathy? If it is the former, then the number of moving parts is far greater and the logistics of maintaining control more complex.

In my mind at least, it makes more sense that these stories are almost entirely fabricated, the individual persons involved are actors and a system of compartmentalization is established to preserve the illusion of authenticity and maintain control.

If the Establishment owns the banks, the media, the courts, the police, the army, etc. why would they permit these stories to germinate and flourish in the first place? They have been 'getting away with it' for centuries and can silence anyone and bury any form of information if they choose, especially so in today's digital age. This is why I have a hard time reconciling the perceived truth with the plausible truth, insomuch as, we're lied to about nearly everything that takes place on 'the world's stage' so how can we trust ANY of this Epstein business?!