This article is: SATIRE... But Timely.... Zuck has met His Boss... cuz the USA will NEVER be Communist...

The site, www.IMAO.us/index has plenty more such articles...

MENLO PARK (AP) – A Facebook ban: it can cost you readers, revenue, reputation, and sometimes even your employment. But Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has butted up against the limits of his power, in the form of a controversial federal law that allows those who have violated Facebook’s Terms of Service Agreement to purchase, possess, and use whatever firearms they want for whatever reason they want.

During a recent interview on MSNBC, Zuckerberg staunchly opposed the “irresponsible” legislation that “puts guns in the hands of America’s most offensive offenders.”

“Facebook is all about human decency and human communication,” said Zuckerberg. “What can you communicate with a gun? Nothing. Which is the only thing people should be allowed to say after they’ve proved they’re not good enough to have a civil discussion on Facebook. So a Facebook ban is like giving them a gun. But a gun of peace, that can’t hurt anyone. Which is entirely different than the guns of hate that this hateful law allows them to have. Which is why this law should be banned, like hate speech from Facebook.”

Facebook spokesman Joseph Isuzu later clarified Zuckerberg’s remarks.

“I think what Mark was trying to say is that the people who end up getting banned from Facebook aren’t normal, everyday, average people,” Isuzu said. “They’re the crude, dangerous, unsavory element you’d expect to see wearing a gauntlet and snapping their fingers. You certainly wouldn’t want them having weapons. Or being able to talk about weapons. Or about laws that allow them to have weapons without the permission of the people who banned them from Facebook for saying those things.”

“Anyway, it’s complicated. Bottom line is that people who can’t be trusted with a safe, squishy, non-threatening thing like Facebook certainly shouldn’t be trusted with guns, and that law that says they can own them should be banned like a gun enthusiast who offended a monolithic powerhouse social media corporation.”

David Scott, a gun enthusiast who offended a monolithic powerhouse social media corporation and was banned for it, said that Facebook was free to talk all they wanted under their First Amendment protections.

“But rest assured,” said Scott, “we’ll continue to exercise our freedoms under the guarantees of the Second Amendment, enshrined as it is in the highest law of this land.”

https://www.imao.us/index.php/2019/06/controversial-law-permits-gun-ownership-by-people-banned-by-facebook/