Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist
http://82.221.129.208/.wn3.html

Do not believe the lies about Notre Dame. NOTHING got wrecked. NOTHING AT ALL. No stained glass windows in the main portion of the cathedral were lost. No artifacts lost. The pipe organ did not get touched by anything, no smoke damage, no water damage, NOTHING. The cathedral survived so well it is as if the protection of God caused it, but going over what happened, supreme architecture and planning for such an event with the way it was built also obviously played a role in how well it made it.

They are claiming that it had to be stabilized after the fire to prevent it's collapse. THAT IS PURE BULLSHIT, the only thing I can say about that is at least they are saying it is now stabilized so they did not 911 it with a little C4 after the "plane impact". Pope Francis is probably PISSED, Michelle Obama is definitely pissed, and Macron is probably a flailing lunatic, trying to pump up public support for making it a mosque because "the damage was so bad the whole thing needs a rebuild" but it is such an obvious patent lie he probably won't get away with what was obviously his primary objective for burning it in the first place. GUESS WHAT: The computers in the fire control system were hacked to give false readings, JUST LIKE STUXNET. Gee, I wonder how that happened and who would have done that.??!!??

NOTRE DAME OBVIOUSLY GOT DAMAGED, BUT IT WAS SUCH SMALL DAMAGE CONSIDERING THE OBJECTIVE THAT IT AMOUNTED TO A WARNING SHOT. I AM OBVIOUSLY NOT HAPPY THE HISTORIC WOODEN ROOF IS GONE, HOWEVER THE BURNING OF NOTRE DAME WAS A FLATULENT SATANIC FAILURE THAT REALLY LOOKS LIKE GOD WAS MORE POWERFUL THAN THE SATANIC FORCES TAKING OVER WESTERN CIVILIZATION. IT REALLY LOOKS LIKE GOD SAID "HELL NO."

On that note, HAPPY EASTER!

CONFIRMED: Notre Dame was virtually unhurt by the fire, and any claims that it has to be "rebuilt" are hoaxes with a motive

The hoax of Notre Dame:

This hoax involved burning a wooden facade "roof" that probably kept water off a secondary roof and prevented freezing problems with the second roof, and NOTHING MORE. Unlike what you have been told by the scamming MSM, the cathedral would never have collapsed because the actual support for the cathedral was provided by the side arches, and the arches of an interior brick and concrete roof three feet thick. This secondary interior roof prevented damage to the inside of the cathedral, except where the spire (questionably, it likely had help) "fell through" it.

The hoax about the cathedral being "destroyed" is now confirmed. Let's get this party started.

Here is how the wooden roof was attached. You can clearly see the concrete dome roof under it was supporting it, and now has less weight to hold with it gone and it would actually be less likely to collapse now provided the heat of the fire did not significantly damage it:

Here is a picture of that burned wooden roof laying on top of the concrete and brick roof under it. Notre Dame was built a LOT better than anything the Romans ever did. With the Roman stuff, once the wooden roof was gone, all that remained was pillars. Clearly here, the real roof consisted of a series of concrete and brick domes.

Here's why the cathedral was, except for where the spire fell through, unscathed:

When you consider the scale of the above picture, the concrete and brick were at least three feet thick on the interior roof There's no way this cathedral got significantly hurt, to the tune of a billion dollars.

Let's take a look at the inside after the fire

Clearly, from the aftermath photo of the interior, they could turn the lights back on if they wanted to. The concrete roof held up so well for so long that there's not even significant smoke damage.

Conclusion: The cathedral is not destroyed, and any stories about how it got devastated are only cover for bilking cash for pork barrel projects and excuses to delay, delay, AND DELAY re-opening it. The cash is there to fix this PRONTO. If the desire is there to fix it (by the people in control), it ought to be open before the end of August with money obviously being no object.

There's no excuse to delay re-opening this cathedral. It was clearly designed to get through a worst case scenario, for the purpose of protecting the priceless antiquities it contained, and the plan worked. Not a single antiquity was lost. None of the candles in the cathedral melted. It got through this that well. If this cathedral does not open STAT, it is because someone (who is importing hordes of Muslims to overtake and destroy Europe) does not want it to open.