What if Mayorkas Had Actually Fired the Shot Himself?
By Mary W Maxwell, PhD, LLB
Many people are feeling desperate about the shots fired at an ex-president in Bethel PA on July 13, 2024. This opens new thoughts about what to do if government personnel and rivals get physical, with an eye to putting one or the other out of business. In this article we can discuss "what to do" by employing a fictitious tale from far-off lands. Let's pretend that there were attempted take-overs of government in Swedland, Denland, and Norland.
"The Scandinavian Situation"
1. Swedland, in 1954, was a monarchy. The people approved of the monarchical form of government -- you knew where you stood, and also the king shared his wealth with the poor. No strangers were allowed into Swed territory, and the locals were not allowed to learn foreign languages. But during World War II, communication with the Continent became inevitable. Soldiers brought home some odd tales of Swedland.
It seems the outside world was perfectly aware that the current monarch, Queen Angela, had attained the throne by deception. The previous monarch, King Nog, and his wife, were killed in an avalanche while skiing in 1940. They had one child, a daughter named Angela, then age 24, who took over immediately -- or so it was said. What really happened was that an ambitious family killed Princess Angela and inserted their daughter Marbie, changing her name, of course, to Angela As she wore a fancy robe and crown, nobody noticed the swap.
Now, in 1954, the population learned that there was never an avalanche! King Nog had been stabbed to death, and this this little faker-- Marbie -- had fooled the people, whilst internationally foreigners enjoyed the joke, calling Swedders stupid.
At the time, there were 160 taverns in Swedland. People customarily drank there on Friday nights. It took only a few "rounds" for them to decide to decapitate "Queen" Angela. I mean, how could you not? Swedders drew lots to determine who, being male and over age 50, would be the new king. "Gorf" won. A platoon of tavern-goers approached Queen Angela, did the needful, and crowned Gorf. Everyone lived happily ever after.
2. In Denland, in 1990, there was a government-by-parliament. It seems that many Denners, who had studied abroad, had become enchanted (literally enchanted) with communism. Upon return, they ran for office as parliamentarians, employing a generalized campaign promise about a salmon in every pot, and social equality for women. Once in office, they began to use openly Marxist lingo, shouting that the dictatorship of the proletariat was at hand and that the state of Denland "as we knew it" would wither away.
Indeed it did wither away the minute these local politicians revealed a contract they had signed with the Supreme Soviet Union. The 'state' was replaced by an open-air prison. New laws criminalized every activity except breathing and working. Everyone suffered and soon they had to speak the language of the Supremers instead of Dennish. it was all so overwhelming that they could not even mount a resistance. Men were ashamed about not protecting their womenfolk and elderly and children. To compensate, they pretended that they liked Denland's incorporation into the Supreme Soviets.
3. Norland had traditionally been a sophisticated nation. In 2001 it was ruled by a Council consisting of 12 highly principled men and women, acting as volunteers for a term of 10 years. These Councilors kept in close touch with the people whose traditional ideology invoked themes of freedom and personal dignity. Laws were well developed to keep rights protected. People were proud and happy.
As the European continent underwent technological advances, business in Norland became intense especially as they had the leading car makers and medical geniuses. During the Spring of 2015, a crisis broke out when it was found that much corruption had entered The Council. A global banking system had imposed itself and apparently caused the majority of Councilors to make secret legislation that gave untold power to the banks. Citizens were reduced to code-number and no longer had "standing" as plaintiffs in court!
At the same time, someone had surreptitiously bought out much of the farm acreage and deliberately poisoned the soil so that crops could not grow. Six retired Councilors, now in their 70s and 80s, saw the imminent disaster of food shortage. They went to the head of the Defense Team, but were chagrined to hear from her that troops were falling ill, and many had suicided.
Further, the Councilors learned that nation's gold treasury had been gutted by thieves.
Meeting at the home of a not-retired Councilor, they drew up a plan for the non-corrupted Councilors (5 out of 12) to "enact," even without a majority vote, a new law aimed at prosecuting the bad 7. By the following day, 3 of those 5 good Councilors were found dead on the street. The two surviving good ones, plus the six elderly retirees, saw that they could not win by using the law. A band of traitors, the seven bad Councilors, had sold out the nation.
Dredging up the maxim "Necessitas non habet legem " (Necessity has no law), they walked into the Council chamber and shot dead the seven treacherous Councilors.
"What if Mayorkas Had Actually Fired the Shot Himself?"
Although this article has a title about Mayorkas, it is not particularly about Alejandro Mayorkas (US Secretary of Homeland Security). Nor do I, personally, think there was any murder plan that day in Pennsylvania. It strikes me as more likely a hoax, a psy-op, meant to traumatize people. Still, I did see several articles on the Internet today (July 24, 2024) that expressed a suspicion that Democrats, dreading a second Trump presidency, chose to rub him off the rollcall.
Yet I did not see any real planning to "get" So-and-So if there really was an attempt on Trump's life. (I did see that the head of Secret Service was to be called in for questioning by Congress, but that was for incompetence not malice, not murder.)
In my little Scandinavian fairy tales above, the wrongdoing was recognized in both Swedland and Norland, and dealt with tit for tat. The miscreants, Queen Angela, and the seven traitors, met their end. In Denland, which fell to communism, the wrongdoing was noticed but, thanks to the odds against the people, they had to choose denial over anger. Note: when African slaves were brought to the US, anger and resistance was suppressed "in advance" by very cruel means.
When a government has been overthrown internally, you would expect -- certainly in America -- that people could clearly spot the criminality and think along the standard lines of punishing criminals. But in America today we definitely do not do that. Isn't that amazing? This fact itself needs to be aired out, bigtime. The following five explanations come to mind:
Blocked Thought
1. Americas has had almost 250 years of patting itself on the back for having a good government. The ideology of rights is thick in the air. I guess there is a subconscious expectation that since our system is good, nothing outrageous can happen. Thus, even if a big booboo shows up, it is assumed that someone is on duty to deal with it.
2. Human beings do not punish members of the social class above them. I have studied this for a long time, and I think it is a biological trait that reigns supreme. Kowtowing to one's superiors is instinctive, presumably because it helps the society get things accomplished. So how did the Swedders kill Queen Angela without remorse? They agreed that she was NOT a queen. She was an imposter. "Throw her to the dogs." How dare she replace our queen, our mother!
3. Another instinct that is hurting us in America today is the tendency to put off till tomorrow anything that does not seem to require immediate action. Plus, we can downplay even an obvious clue as being "not a worry." We saw the 5G towers go up over every square mile of the nation, but heck, it could be for a very benign reason, couldn't it? To give us faster callup on our cell phones perhaps?
4. One essential aspect of the current takeover of America is that there is no longer a life of the mind. Questioners are called nutjobs, where they used to be called scholars. And the majority of people have willingly absorbed the trick of the media/propagandists by which persons who recognize actual conspiracy within government are mocked, or are even ostracized. It gets surprisingly emotional. Families break up over it. (Ask why.)
5. Schools no longer teach children how to make an argument. Sudents, even in high school, are told that consensus is a virtue and taking an argumentative pose hurts the feelings of others! Similarly, the young are not shown how to dig into a report to see if it has valid sources and good logic. "Just smile and accept."
Yes, But What If a Government Person Really Did Arrange Trump's Death?
Don't let my five explanations take away from the main issue here, which is "what to do." Recall "Norland's" predicament. Their nation had law, but it wasn't being followed. The bad Councilors had already made sure that 3 of the 5 patriots were slain on the street, implying that no revolt by good Councilors would be tolerated. It was all going downhill fast. Extra-legal action had to be taken.
Hmm. Let's point again to numbers 2 and 3 on the above list of explanations, but combine them into one: We almost totally avoid punishing a person of higher rank than ourselves, and we can stare at a problem thinking it will go away by itself. Oh wait, we'd better include number 1 on the list, too: As Americans we think everything is copacetic.
The JFK assassination is now 60 years in the past. It is beyond doubt that the killers of Kennedy (the arrangers, not the shooters) included high-ranking members of government. At a minimum, Vice President Johnson, CIA Director Allen Dulles, and FBI Director J Edgar Hoover.
You may ask why I did not name mafia people, who clearly participated. The answer is that I said I would list "high-ranking members of government." You could, I suppose, say that the mafia has infiltrated our government. A new book entitled Stolen Identity, by J Kennedy, may make you deeply aware of the big role that the mafia plays in the undoing of what used to be a transparent and accountable government.
Othe Assassinations
In any case, all we get with assassinations (including that of Robert F Kennedy in 1968, so wrongly chalked up to 'Sirhan Sirhan"), is a bunch of distractions and meaningless "official inquiries." We have been accepting the notion that zooming in on the guilty party is NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
Note in the case of MLK's death in 1968, his widow Coretta Scott King ultimately sued in court when she found out that James Earl Ray was not the shooter. (He was the standard patsy and yet suffered 30 years of wrongful imprisonment.) The jury decided that getting rid of MLK was a conspiracy involving government. How did the media manage to keep this from us? Why, simple -- they did not send any reporters to watch the court case.
AND EVEN IF IT HAD COME OUT, nothing would have been done. We Americans were good at shooting our overlords in 1775 (I mean the redcoats whom the king sent), but we don't shoot overlords today. Instead, we -- quite properly -- expect the justice system to do that. But oh-oh, the Justice system WILL NOT do it.
THIMK
Finally, back to the question "What If Mayorkas had actually fired the shot himself?" I mean what if he had personally organized the action (involving Crooks or some other shooter), and the bullet did go through Trump's brain? Picture the Republican presidential candidate lying dead on the stage.
Is it murder? Is there any reason not to book a Cabinet member, Mayorkas, for that (hypothetical) crime? If Attorney General Merrick Garland, and the Pennsylvania state AG won't proceed with the booking, what should be done? Moreover, if it is determined that "Mayorkas" planned to kill Trump, but the turning of the head thwarted that, is it not still the crime of murder?
Come on, it's a serious question. If you are over 18 you should try to answer it.
-- Mary Maxwell lives in New Hampshire. Her website is www.ConstitutionAndTruth.com