Regarding copyright, see Legal Notice on the linked page:

http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/03/international-public-notice-extra.html

=====

Thursday, March 21, 2024

International Public Notice: Extra-Territorial Mischief

By Anna Von Reitz

Long ago in the very early 1900's, a series of Supreme Court cases known collectively as the Insular Tariff Cases cleared the way for what dissenting Justice Harlan prophetically called, "mischief".

The Insular Tariff cases allowed the USA, Inc., to collect taxes owed in the Territories and Possessions of the United States in the States themselves, and vice versa, so long as the entities that were being collected upon were Territorial Corporations or franchises thereof.

This goes back to the English Scheme of "enfranchising" the working class people and using this device to impersonate them as mere franchise corporations and thereby subject them to Maritime Law.

The British Territorial USA, Inc., wanted to create the same system in the Territories and Possessions and apply it to their employees and corporations organized in the Territories and Possessions. This would also allow them to collect "income taxes" and other "gift and estate taxes" from their own employees and from corporations registered under their auspices.

In the Insular Tariff Cases they were allowed to expand their activities and collect against Territorial Persons and Corporations residing in The United States.

However trivial this might at first appear and however justified (of course, they can "tax" their own employees for the privilege of enfranchisement, and they can tax corporations registered in Puerto Rico or Guam) it was an occasion for far greater and extra-territorial mischief than anyone but Justice Harlan could foresee.

Because they had already substituted their British Territorial State-of-State organizations for our American State-of-State organizations in the confusion after the Civil War, they already had the means to register large numbers of Territorial Corporations in The United States proper.

All they had to do was keep their mouths shut, and when people came through the door seeking to set up a business corporation --- not tell them that they had the option to organize under the State Trust or the British Territorial State-of-State --- and assume that the victim wanted to set up a State-of-State (Territorial) Corporation instead of a State Corporation.

In effect, all they had to do was hand the victims the wrong set of paperwork, and not disclose the existence of the better choice --- which they did.

State Corporations don't have the regulatory and taxation burdens of State-of-State Corporations, so it's unlikely that people given full disclosure would ever choose to incorporate their business under a State-of-State Corporation, but acting in ignorance, they did.

And their lawyers let them, because their lawyers were largely British-affiliated Bar Attorneys, Esquires loyal to the King, and the King gained a lot of control over and money from owning these Territorial State-of-State business corporations.

The Esquires also omitted telling their clients that when they "registered" their corporations with the State-of-State organization, that State-of-State and its parent Corporation and the British King all gained the ownership interest in the new enterprise.

Needless to say, all the British Territorial bureaucrats operating in this country were highly motivated to register as many of our Corporations as they possibly could, so that all these businesses organized by Americans would become subject to British Crown regulations and would be owned and taxed by their King.

Their mammoth failure to disclose both the choice to organize under the State Trust or the State-of-State and the effects of registration of a corporation with the State-of-State organization versus a State Corporation, amounts to self-interested fraud by omission and deceit.

Americans were never told that the State-of-State organizations after the Civil War were franchises of a foreign, for-profit corporation in the business of providing governmental services. They firmly believed and assumed that these organizations were the same before and after the war, and that they were dealing with their own State-sponsored State-of-State organization, not a British cuckoo bird.

The British Territorial Usurpers have operated under color of law, and in extremely bad faith, in competition against their Employers, while pretending to act as the custodians and trustees of our, their Employer's, property interests.

This particular bit of "mischief" resulted in the creation of thousands of registered Territorial "State of State" Corporations operating in The United States proper -- all of which the British King owned secret title to, all of which became subject to British Territorial law, and British Territorial taxes.

This gave rise to the infamous "Federal Income Tax" which is not Federal per se, but is a Territorial tax levied on corporations organized under and registered by State-of-State corporations which are franchises of one of our Federal Subcontractors, the United States of America, Incorporated.

As a private matter, the United States of America, Incorporated, could require an employee payroll kickback "tax" as a condition of employment from the employees of their franchise corporations registered by their State-of-State organizations.

It wasn't long before the Municipal Corporation operating as the United States, Incorporated, got on board with the same gravy train, with the result that we soon saw a "Sixteenth Amendment" that was never ratified by our States being randomly enforced against our people, and two new Federal Agencies called the Internal Revenue Service and IRS, respectively, harassing everyone to pay this new "Federal" (Territorial and/or Municipal) Income Tax.

Shortly thereafter, the Brits operating in Bad Faith and Breach of Trust, hit upon the idea of "enfranchising" American babies, by registering them as U.S. Citizens. And then the United States, Inc. hit upon the idea of registering the Estates of these "lost at sea British Merchant Mariners" as Cestui Que Vie Trusts. All very creative. All very criminal.

When called to account for these activities, the criminals claimed that they were acting as Public Usufructs when they created all these unauthorized franchises to benefit their corporations, but then, they mysteriously failed their Usufructuary Duty to protect the American victims of all this fraud and didn't hold them harmless from the effects of creating these foreign Things named after them; most especially, the American victims were not protected from the bills and taxes owed by all these foreign Persons and PERSONS, so gratuitously registered and named after them without their knowledge or consent.

We would say that all this goes a long, long way beyond "mischief" and long ago entered the realm of capital crimes of unlawful conversion, inland piracy, breach of trust, conspiracy against the Constitutions, kidnapping, impersonation, barratry, and more.

Based on the non-disclosures and omissions cited above, we claim all State-of-State and STATE-OF-STATE or STATE registered corporations that exist on our land and soil as the fruits of Breach of Trust and Bad Faith and filthy paws in commerce; we also claim that unless someone says that they knowingly want to be treated as a British Territorial Indentured Servant or as a Municipal Slave, all the American-sourced corporations and the employees of all these misbegotten British Territorial and Municipal Corporations must be set free of any presumption of being U.S. Citizens, citizens of the United States, or US CITIZENS in receipt of Federally-connected income.

These are issues to be known to the International Community at Large and specifically made plain for the Esquires and attorneys and Hired Jurists among us. Our purported Trustees and Custodians have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and have been about as Dishonorable as it is possible to be, whereupon we are making it crystal clear to them and to the International Community that they do not represent us or have permission to do anything to or for us, beyond the strictly construed services we contracted to receive, and as defined when the contracts were signed.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

March 21st 2024

----------------------------

See this article and over 4700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

*************************************************************