We're suing Springer Nature for $250M in punitive damages for the unethical retraction of our COVID harms paper

Someone has to hold the journals accountable for unethical retractions of valid scientific papers. Otherwise, they will not change their behavior.

STEVE KIRSCH

Executive summary
The scientific journals have been getting away with unethical retractions for decades.

They unethically retracted our paper, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.”

Here are the bogus reasons the journal gave for retraction and Peter McCullough’s EXCELLENT article regarding the impact of the paper and our response to their reasons

It’s time for this unethical practice to stop.

I hired a private investigator and was able to get the goods on the editors of Cureus so I know for a fact the paper was unethically retracted.

It’s time for the journals to be held accountable.

I’ll be filing suit next week against Springer Nature and Cureus seeking $250M in punitive damages so that the journals think twice the next time they get a paper they don’t like.

Here’s the full story…

Email from their legal department
Dear Mr. Kirsch,

We acknowledge receipt of your recent correspondence to Springer Nature’s Research Integrity Group regarding the retraction of your publication, “COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines: Lessons Learned from the Registrational Trials and Global Vaccination Campaign.”

To proceed effectively in a review of your legal concerns regarding the retraction, kindly outline your specific legal objections, including any relevant facts or documents.

Our legal department assesses all suggestions of legal action seriously and carefully. We look forward to your prompt and detailed response.

Sincerely,

General Counsel’s Office
Springer Nature Group

Much More at The Link:

MAR 6, https://kirschsubstack.com/p/were-suing-springer-nature-for-250m?
--------------------------------
Dear RM Agents and Readers,

Go Steve Kirsh and God Bless Him!

Many Blessings,
CrystalRiver